A Superação de Lacunas de Atuação das Organizações Públicas em Sistemas de Inovação / Overcoming Gaps in the Performance of Public Organizations Within Innovation Systems
Resumo
O presente estudo buscou identificar configurações organizacionais públicas que permitam uma atuação mais efetiva do Estado junto aos sistemas de inovação à luz da teoria das capacidades dinâmicas. Para isso, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de literatura junto a periódicos de Administração e Economia especializados em inovação, de modo a mapear lacunas na atuação de organizações públicas. A partir desses estudos inventariados, as lacunas de atuação foram analisadas à luz da teoria das capacidades dinâmicas. Por fim, a análise levou à proposição de uma abordagem de inovação colaborativa capaz de integrar efetivamente as organizações públicas aos sistemas de inovação. Essa abordagem se mostra situada com o grande paradigma de administração pública conhecido como Nova Governança Pública (NGP).
Palavras-chave: Capacidades Dinâmicas. Inovação Colaborativa.Sistemas de Inovação.
ABSTRACT
The present study sought to identify public organizational configurations that allow a more effective performance of the State in the innovation systems in the light of the theory of dynamic capabilities. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out with Administration and Economics journals specialized in innovation in order to map gaps in the performance of public organizations. From these inventoried studies, the performance gaps were analyzed in the light of the theory of dynamic capabilities. Finally, the analysis led to the proposition of a collaborative innovation approach capable of effectively integrating public organizations into innovation systems. This approach is situated within the great paradigm of public administration known as New Public Governance (NGP).
Keywords: Dynamic Capabilities. Collaborative Innovation. Innovation Systems.
Referências
BOMMERT, B. Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International public management review, v. 11, n. 1, p. 15-33, 2010.
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. Plano Diretor da Reforma do Estado. Ministério da Administração Federal e Reforma do Estado, 1995.
BREZNITZ, Dan. Collaborative Public Space in a National innovation System: A Case Study of the Irsaelli Military’s Impact on the Software Industry. Industry and Innovation. Volume 12. Issue 1. 2005.
BROWN, Ross. Mission Impossible? Entrepreneurial Universities and peripheral regional innoovation systems. Industry and Innovation. Volume 23. Issue 2. 2016.
CASSIOLATO, José Eduardo. LASTRES, Maria Martins. Local Systems of Innovation in Mercosur Countries. Industry and Innovation. Volume 7. Issue 1. 2000.
CRESWELL, J.W. Revisão de literatura. In: ______. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007, p. 43-63.
COOKE, P. (2001). New Economy Innovation Systems: Biotechnology In Europe And The USA. Industry and Innovation, 8(3), 267–289.doi:10.1080/13662710120104583
ETZKOWITZ, Henry. The Triple Helix of University - Industry – Government Implications for Policy and Evaluation. Science Policy Institute. p. 1-18. 2002.
FREEMAN, C. The National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Journal of Economics, 1995, Vol.19, pp.5-24.
FREEMAN, C.; SOETE, L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter, Terceira Edição, 1997.
FRITSCH, Micheal. SCHWIRTEN, Christian. Enterprise-University Co-operation and the role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems. Industry and Innovation. Volume 6. Issue 1. 1999.
FUKUGAWA, Nobuya. Knowledge spillover from university research before the national system reform in Japan: localization, mechanisms e intermediaries. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. Volume 24. Issue 1. 2016.
GEE, S., & MCMEEKIN, A. (2011). Eco-Innovation Systems and Problem Sequences: The Contrasting Cases of US and Brazilian Biofuels. Industry & Innovation, 18(3), 301–315.doi:10.1080/13662716.2011.561029
GOYER, M. (2001). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN FRANCE 1985-2000. Industry and Innovation, 8(2), 135–158.doi:10.1080/713670272
HELFAT, C. E; MARTIN, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review andassessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management,41(5), 1281–1312.
INTARAKUMNERD, P. CHAOROENPORN P. (2013) The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation system in developing countries: public organizations versus private organizations. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. Volume 21. Issue 1. 2013.
INTARAKUMNERD, P., CHAIRATANA, P., & KAMONDETDACHA, R. (2015). Innovation system of the seafood industry in Thailand. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 271–287.doi:10.1080/19761597.2015.1078925
KARO, E.; KATTEL, R. Innovation bureaucracy: does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation? Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy, Lund University, 2015. (Working Paper, n. 38).
KATTEL, R. CEPILOVS, Alexander. DRECHSLER, Wolfgang. KELVET, Tarmo. LEMBER, Veiko. TONURIST, Piret. Can we measure public sector innovation? A literature review. Roterdã: Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2014. (Lipse Working Papers, n. 2).
LUNDVALL, Bengt-Ake. National Innovation Systems – Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation. Volume 14. Issue 1. 2007.
MAZZUCATO, M. The Entrepreneurial State. London:Demos, 2011. Disponível em http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Entrepreneurial_State_- _web.pdf
NELSON, R. R. WINTER, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
MYTELKA, L. K. (2000). LOCAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD ECONOMY. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 15–32.doi:10.1080/713670244
MOTOHASHI, K. (2006). China’s national innovation system reform and growing science industry linkage. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 14(2), 49–65.doi:10.1080/19761597.2006.9668618
MALERBA, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31.
NAMBISAN, S. Transforming Government Through Collaborative Innovation. IBM Center for the Business of Government, 2008.
OSBORNE, S. P.; STROKOSCH, K..It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management, v. 24, n. 1, p. 31– 47, 2013.
OSBORNE, S. P. A services-influenced approach to public service innovation? In: OSBORNE, S.; BROWN, L. (org) Handbook of innovation in public services. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.
OSBORNE, S. P.; RADNOR, Z.; NASI, G. A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration, v. 43, n. 2, p.135– 158, 2013.
POLLIT, C.; BOUCKAERT, G. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance and Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
POTTS, J. The innovation deficit in public services: The curious problem of too much efficiency and not enough waste and failure. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, v. 11, n. 1, p. 34-43, 2009.
SAARI, E.; LEHTONEN, M.; TOIVONEN, M. Making bottom-up and top-down processes meet in public innovation. Services Industries Journal, v. 35, n.6, p. 325-344, 2015.
SCHILING, M. (2006) Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. Segunda Edição. New York: McGraw-Hill.
PARK, Yongtae. PARK, Gwangman. When Does a National Innovation System Start to Exhibit Systemic Behavior? Industry and Innovation. Volume 10. Issue 4. 2011.
PIENING, E. P. (2013) Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations, Public Management Review, 15:2, 209-245, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.708358
POLANYI, M. A Dimensão Tácita. Lisboa:Inovatec, 2010. Cap.1
STEEN, Marianne Van Der. ENDERS, Jurgen. Universities in Evolutionary Systems of Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management. Volume 17. Issue 4. 2008.
TEECE, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoun-dations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,28(13), 1319–1350.
THIRUCHELVAM, K. Towards a dynamic national system of innovation in Malaysia: Enhancing the management of R&D in public research institutions and universities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. Volume 12. Issue 2. 2011.
XI, Liang, LEI, Lin & GUISHENG, wu (2009) Evolution of the Chinese Automobile Industry from a Sectoral System of Innovation Perspective, Industry and Innovation, 16:4-5, 463-478, DOI: 10.1080/13662710903053755
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12819/2023.20.9.6
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Atribuição (BY): Os licenciados têm o direito de copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, conquanto que deem créditos devidos ao autor ou licenciador, na maneira especificada por estes.
Não Comercial (NC): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, desde que sejam para fins não-comerciais
Sem Derivações (ND): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar apenas cópias exatas da obra, não podendo criar derivações da mesma.
ISSN 1806-6356 (Impresso) e 2317-2983 (Eletrônico)