<document>
<page>
<par>
<line>
www4.fsane*.com.br/revista
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Teresin*, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, *. 96-115, set./out. 2016
</line>
<line>
ISS* I*p**sso: 1806-6356 ISSN *l*tr*nico: 2317-2983
</line>
<line>
h*tp://dx.doi.o*g/10.12*19/2016.13.5.6
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Icts Optimization and Inform*tional *low Increasing: Impacts on High S*h*ol Daily L*fe
</line>
<line>
*timiz**ão das Tecnolo**as da Inform*ção e Comuni*ação * A*mento do F*uxo Informac**nal:
</line>
<line>
I*pactos no *oti*iano E*c*lar do E*sino Médio
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Horácio d*s S*ntos Ribeiro Pi***
</line>
<line>
Mestre em *ognição e Lingu*gem pela U*iversidade *stadual do Norte *lu*inense Darcy Ri*eiro
</line>
<line>
Prof*ss*r do Inst**uto Fed*ra* Fluminense
</line>
<line>
*-m**l: hpires@*ff.edu.br
</line>
<line>
Eliana C*i*pim Franç* Luquetti
</line>
<line>
Do*tora em Linguísti*a pe*a Universida*e Fe*er*l do R*o de Janei*o
</line>
<line>
P*o*essora da *niv*rsidade Estad*al do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ri*eiro
</line>
<line>
E-mail: elin*f*f@*m*il.*om
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
</par>
<par>
</par>
</page><page>
<par>
<line>
I*ts *pt*mization and Informational *low In*rea*ing: Impacts on High School *aily Life
</line>
<line>
9*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ABS*RACT
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
This *tudy aims to evaluate how the a*vancemen* *nd empowerment of textual/hyp*r**xt*al
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
insta**e an* re*d**g media ha*e chan*ed reade* and authors*i* profil*s
</line>
<line>
and what the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
implicatio*s *n *chool life, s*ecifically in h*g* *c*o**. The advent of
</line>
<line>
*yberspace and the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ig*tal w*rld brin*s
</line>
<line>
paradig* shifts, *specially when it comes to reading
</line>
<line>
and **thorship,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
requi*ing collaborative reade*s *nd autho*s-readers *o*l*wing the dynamism, fluidity, sp*ed
</line>
<line>
and li*u*dity of the current e*a. There*o*e, the school context of In*tit*to Federal *lu*inense
</line>
<line>
Cam*us Bom Jesu*/RJ was o*s*rv**, com*r*s**g teach*rs a*d **ude*ts o* h*gh sc*ool. S*, it
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
was poss*b** to
</line>
<line>
eval*ate th* teachi**-l*arning pro*ess of that
</line>
<line>
Institute: stu*ents (digital
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
natives) would be rece*ving appropriate care in th* Institute? Have the teachers been *raini*g
</line>
<line>
in their proper appa*atus to de*l wi*h thes* g*ys? Ha* the school fulfilled i** soc*al role as
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
c*tizens train*ng?
</line>
<line>
The study was guided in the light of t**oretical
</line>
<line>
contrib*tions of scholars
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
su*h as Pi*rre Lévy, Roger Cha*tier, Marcuschi, Santaella, Gil*es Dele*ze a*d Félix Guattari,
</line>
<line>
among *thers a*out readin* paths, hype*text*alit*, clash *f generations (digital *atives vs.
</line>
<line>
digital i*mi*rants) and rea*ing media. The result* show that th* teachers did n*t receive (and
</line>
<line>
s*ill do not) in their a**demic educat*on, teaching m*thods and strategies *u*ded by *h* use of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ICTs, meeting un*repared
</line>
<line>
t*
</line>
<line>
deal with the
</line>
<line>
ne w
</line>
<line>
d*man*s
</line>
<line>
** the educationa* routi*e
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ther*fore no* meeting the students o*es.
</line>
<line>
*e*-wor*s: Cybersp*ce. Hypertextual*ty. *eadi*g Media.
</line>
<line>
RESU*O
</line>
<line>
E*te es*udo tem c*mo *bjetivo avalia* * forma co** o avanço e a pot*n*ialização *a in*tâ**ia
</line>
<line>
textual/hiper*e*tual e dos suportes de lei*ura têm muda*o os perfis de *eitor e a*toria e qua*s
</line>
<line>
a* imp*icaçõ*s na vida esco*ar, esp*cificamente no Ens*no Mé*io. * adv*nto do ciber*spaço e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*o mun*o *igital traz *u*an*a* de
</line>
<line>
pa*adigma, es*ecialmen*e quand* se trata d*
</line>
<line>
leitura
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
autoria, exig*ndo
</line>
<line>
leitor*s colabo*ativos e autores-leito**s que acompa*hem o din*mismo,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
fluidez,
</line>
<line>
velocidade e liquide* da era atua*. Para t**, ob*ervou-se o cont*xto esc***r
</line>
<line>
do
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
In*tituto F*deral Fluminense *ampu* B*m Jesus/*J, *om*ree*dend* p*ofessores e alunos do
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ensino Méd*o. Assim, foi pos**vel avaliar o pro*esso
</line>
<line>
de ensi*o-ap*endiz**e* daquela
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
in*tituição: *s estudantes (na*iv*s digitais)
</line>
<line>
estariam receb*ndo *s cuida*os adequado*
</line>
<line>
na
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Institu**ão? Os
</line>
<line>
pr*fessore*
</line>
<line>
têm em *ua formação o aparato adequado
</line>
<line>
*ara li**r com esses
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
s*jeito*? S*** q*e * esco*a *em cum*rido o seu pa*el s*ci** como forma*ora de cidadãos? O
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
estudo foi nor*ea*o l*z das contribuições teórica* de estudios*s como Pierre Lévy, Rog*r *
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ch*rti*r, Marcusch*, Sa*tae*l*, *eleuze e Guatt*r*,
</line>
<line>
entre outros, a respe*to dos trajetos de
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
le*tu*a,
</line>
<line>
*iperte*tua*idade, con**it* d*
</line>
<line>
gerações (n*t*vos digitais cont*a im*****tes dig*tais)
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
suportes
</line>
<line>
de leit*ra. Os resultados mostram que os profes**res não rec**e*am (e con*inuam
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
se* re*ebe*)
</line>
<line>
e* *ua for*a*ão acad**ica, método* de ensino e estratégi*s de utiliz**ão *a*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
TIC*, encontrando-se de*preparad*s par*
</line>
<line>
lidar com as
</line>
<line>
**vas demanda*
</line>
<line>
do cotidian*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
educacion*l e, p*rt*n*o, d*s alunos.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Palavr**-c*ave: Ciberespa*o. **pertex*uali*ade. *uporte *e Lei**r*.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Ter**ina PI, *. *3, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-115, set/o*t. 2016
</line>
<line>
w*w4.*sanet.com.*r/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. Pi*es, E. C. F. Luqu*tti
</line>
<line>
98
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1 INTR*D*CT*ON
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*is study *ims t* assess how th* *d**ncemen* and empowerment o* textu*l/hy*ertext
</line>
<line>
ins*ance a*d *ea**ng su*ports have been chang*ng r*ader and autho*s*ip p*ofil** as well as t*
</line>
<line>
figur* *he im**ication* i* sc*o*l life, specifically *n High School. It i* *n*wn th*t t*e ad*en*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
of cyberspa*e a*d t*e digi*al w***d brings *ith
</line>
<line>
paradi*m sh*fts, especially in regard to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
reading and author*hip r*quiring collaborative
</line>
<line>
auth*r-readers and readers *ho follow the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dynamic*, fluidit*, speed
</line>
<line>
and liquidi*y o* *he curr*n* era. Fo* this en*, the scho*l
</line>
<line>
c*n*e*t
</line>
<line>
is
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
o*served, i*clu*i*g tea*hers and student* of High School *f the **stit**o *ede**l Flumi*e*se
</line>
<line>
Camp*s Bom Jesus/RJ in o*de* to e*al*ate t*e t*aching/learning moment: whether *tud**t*
</line>
<line>
(digital native*) h*ve been re**iving appropria*e care in the *nstitute, and if **achers *av* g*t
</line>
<line>
alo*g their *ra*n*ng suit*ble mechanisms fo* dealin* *ith the** issu*s, and the la*t *ut not th*
</line>
<line>
least, if th* school ha* fu*filled it* social r*le of *r*i*ing citi*ens.
</line>
<line>
The pre*ent e*ude will be guided by the light *f the theore*ic*l co*tri*ution of
</line>
<line>
i*telec*uals *uch as Pierre Lévy, Roger Chartier, M*r*uschi, Santae*la, Deleuze and Gu*ttari,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
**ong
</line>
<line>
o*hers about read*ng p*ths, hy**rtextuality, the c*ash
</line>
<line>
*f gener**ions (native* versus
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dig*tal immigrant*) a*d reading su*por*s.
</line>
<line>
** is unden*able the technolo*ical advan*emen* in *hic* humanity has *een **ssi*g
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
over along the *ime, mai*ly in *ecent
</line>
<line>
*e**des. Increasingly, techniques have
</line>
<line>
been imp*oved
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
and e*hanced m*king *he societ* t*nds *o adapt to *he cons*an* chan**s wh*ch
</line>
<line>
arise eve*y
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
mom*nt ** consi*e*able spee*. Th* new comes strong as a waterfall in
</line>
<line>
an avalanch* *f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*otential, *n* with*ut permission, will *e allocating *n our *i*st.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
C**m*nication and in**rm*tion beco**s *ui*k, *ast and f*uid. *h*t is *he er* of Just-
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*-time a*d requires each of us t* be as fast
</line>
<line>
as
</line>
<line>
th* time flo*s. This affect*
</line>
<line>
the socie*y at
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
who*e, parti**larly the Educa*ion. *ew reader a*d author profile* are necessa*y beca**e of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the dynamics of the moment which requires the total **sorp*ion *f in*ormation
</line>
<line>
as fast as
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
possible.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*he adv*nt of computers and the Internet whi*h ar* Cy*ers*ace *rivers v*hicles, has
</line>
<line>
been c**sing *** boom of *he current sc**er* for being po*entiating t*ols of informat*on and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
communic*tion, as wel* as se*ting new parad*gms
</line>
<line>
of wri*ing *nd reading: i*fographic*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hypertext and h*permedi*, a
</line>
<line>
po*ential breakthroug* that ca*se* *he *ame imp*ct *s the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Gutenbe*g pr*ss.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
For these reason*, *ducation starts bei*g r*thought. There is a need f*r retr*ining
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
te*ch*rs to meet the d*ma*ds of digital natives and these, o* their *urn, *u*t be o**ented
</line>
<line>
*o
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
*ev. *SA, Teresina, *. *3, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-115, set./ou*. 20*6 www4.fsanet.com.br/re*i*ta
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Icts Optimization **d *n*ormation** Flow I*creasing: Impa*ts *n High Sc*ool Daily L*fe
</line>
<line>
99
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*bsorb as much as you can turning these absorptions to kn*wl*dge a*d make *o*d use of i*.
</line>
<line>
Be*ides, it is also nee*ed the D**ital Literacy or *u*tilit*rcy which tra*scends the *rdina*y
</line>
<line>
rite of *iteracy, demandin* the *c*oo* consciousn*s* consist*ng with the lived real*ty, in order
</line>
<line>
to able to rec*iv* the *re*ent-day pub*ic who has *een b*rning inserted amid t*e ne*, the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
constant chang*s a*d above al*, to *nable them to act this muta*t and f*st atmosphere in in
</line>
<line>
constant becom*ng.
</line>
<line>
2 THEORETIC*L *RA*EWORK
</line>
<line>
2.1 (R)evolut*on *f writing: *ut*or and authors*ip in **c**
</line>
<line>
After the discovery of mova*le types, a styli*tic shock is introduced: manusc*ip*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
versus p*inted book, these being lightly u*deserv*d by *olders
</line>
<line>
*.*. the*e is resi*t*nce as
</line>
<line>
t *e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
a*cep*ance of the *ew (prin*e*) wh*ch r*presents the sam* impact figured *ut nowadays
</line>
<line>
between print *n* dig*tal. It i* pos*ible *o establ*sh a dial*g*e with Chartier (1998) about the
</line>
<line>
re*ol*t*on b*ought about by t*e advent of pr*nt*n* wh*ch c*use* * de*rease in p*odu*tion
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
costs. However, *o the researcher, this re**lution is *ot as absolute *eca*** both
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*an*script and the post-*utenbe*g book have *een *ase* on *he same *unda*ental
</line>
<line>
structures: *he Codex. Aspects suc* as pagi*g, abst*act, contents are from *andwritten phase
</line>
<line>
that is inh*rited by G*tenberg and later *y the modern b*ok (C*ART*ER, 1*98, pp.7-8).
</line>
<line>
The **dern reader is *o longer seen as a passiv* and inert s**jec* and the r*ading
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
proc*ss *tself h*s been
</line>
<line>
u*dergoing a
</line>
<line>
process o* streamlining. N*w read*r **d a*tho* can
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
d**logue more openl* and **nestly and that one, according to Lévy (*011), update the text(*)
</line>
<line>
at the time o* reading ie "*he reader's in*e*ligence r*ses o**r the e*p*y page* one mobile and
</line>
<line>
rugged la*d*c*** *eman*ics" (LÉVY, 2011, p.35) wh*ch mean* th*t the senses are not *iven
</line>
<line>
*n*tially, but when (re)read. An* he *ontinue*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Fi**t, th* text is pitted, scratche*,
</line>
<line>
dott*d *ith gaps. The words are *ember* of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ph*ases that we *o *ot **stra*t (th* perceptual but also intellectual sen*e). The*e
</line>
<line>
are the text *ragme*ts we do not und**st*nd, put togethe*, meet each other, *nd
</line>
<line>
even neglect. So that, para*oxic**ly, read, listen, is to begin to n*g*ect, *nread *r
</line>
<line>
turn the text off. At the *ame time w* tear it by reading a** listening, *e crumple
</line>
<line>
the text. We fold it on him. We m*tch the passages which cor*espond each other.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
We sew *he sparse, exposed and
</line>
<line>
d*spers*d members up o* t*e ***fac* of
</line>
<line>
t*e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
pages o* the linearity of the speech: reading a text is reun*te* textiles gestures tha*
</line>
<line>
ga*e it its name. (Ibid, pp.35-36, Tran**ated).
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Re*. ***, T*resin* P*, v. 13, *. 5, art. 6, p. 96-115, **t/out. 2016
</line>
<line>
*ww4.fsa*et.com.b*/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. Pires, *. C. F. Luquetti
</line>
<line>
100
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The stud*es of L*vy (*011) are directly *ssociat*d *ith th* Zilberman (2001) *houghts
</line>
<line>
which also allows us to infer *he pr*acti*ity co*ing *rom the curr*nt reade* as *ell as the self
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
inter*al stripping caused by di*log (**so proactiv*) bet*een r*ad*r *n* aut*o* and
</line>
<line>
t hi s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
perf*rms more asse**ively *hro**h the porosi*y of the pa*er or its hollow* and dep*essio*s. In
</line>
<line>
her own words,
</line>
<line>
The linear*t* *he words a*e pres*nted is m*slea*i*g just because among each oth*r
</line>
<line>
t***e are many gaps hidde* as if the voids could *o* be seen w*th the n*ked ey*.
</line>
<line>
T** li*erary ti*sue is a *hin and delic*te, no* **lid: it c*ntains too many hol*s
</line>
<line>
mimick*ng the constitu*ive pa*e* *orosity, and thro*ghout *h*s surface leani*g to
</line>
<line>
the *bsorptio* of the other penet*ates the reader. (Ibid, pp.118-1*9, Translated).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Whereas it is n*t hard or
</line>
<line>
plaste*ed, pape*
</line>
<line>
allows *ons*ant communica*ion a*o*g
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
discou*se entities, in other w*r*s reade*/writ*r a*d vice versa, so th*t both are mutually
</line>
<line>
*bsorb*d. The dig*ta* text is supported by th* screen w*ich c*n*ists in a* objec* not *irectly
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
handled by the *e*de*. The struc*ure, o*ganiz*tion and distribution of *hi* kind
</line>
<line>
of text
</line>
<line>
*n*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
imag*s as wel*, ar* not *he same as the
</line>
<line>
reade* of the ancient scr*lls was confro*ted to by
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
reading *orizontally a*d *inearly. The cur*ent reading *roc*ss is fluid, *alle**le and there is
</line>
<line>
no more com*itment to t*e disc**sive *inearity (CHAR*IER, 1998, p.12).
</line>
<line>
Th*s finding allows us to be restless *egarding the di*ital book revolution: whether this
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
is actuall* *he r**olution of revolution*. Wh** can b* seen is that every
</line>
<line>
discovery
</line>
<line>
brings
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
together optimizations
</line>
<line>
and imp*ov*m*nts *oncerning wha* h*ve been
</line>
<line>
di*cov*red, however
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
would it be
</line>
<line>
correct to *ay that the last
</line>
<line>
stage of perfe*tion i* t*e *reatest re*ol*tions and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
transfor*ations wher**y a parti*u*ar object o* scen**y has ever experienc*d?
</line>
<line>
*.2 New Reader and Authorsh*p Pr*files
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Writing has been not*bly i*provin* since i*s creation step by step
</line>
<line>
and generates
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
need to (re)adaptation which o*iginates new ways o* readin* an* new ki*d* *f r*ade*s as well.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Inside the ancient rolls, *deas *ere dispos*d li*ea*
</line>
<line>
a*d horizontally, making reade* to b*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
p*si*ione* *n t*e same way. Thi* pass**e behav*or is inh*ri*ed by m*nuscript and later by t*e
</line>
<line>
**inted book of Gut*nbe*g. In this ne* phase, reader and author f*rs*ke *aziness, stillness and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*orizonta*ity of the r*ading process and
</line>
<line>
dip in the noi*e and *angle *f in*ormation
</line>
<line>
whi**
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
intensi*y th*mselves by fol*owing the fluid*ty, speed and d*namics *f the mom**t causing *he
</line>
<line>
same as witnessed *hen t*e f*r*hcom*ng *f the press.
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, *eresin*, *. 13, n. 5, *rt. 6, p. 96-**5, set./out. 2016 ww*4.f*ane*.co*.br/re*ist*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Ict* Optimiza*ion *nd Informatio*al F*ow Increasing: *mp*cts on High Scho*l Daily Li*e
</line>
<line>
101
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Accordi*g *o Villaça (2002, *.17):
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The complexity m*teria*ized in mediati*ns is revisited at th* *ime of p*ess a**ent,
</line>
<line>
at the t*me of *cce*erati*n of the pro*ess *ith *he introduction of t*e *ota*y, an*
</line>
<line>
*oday, *he* the *laces of pr*duc*ion an* *eprod*ction suffe* new sh*ck.
</line>
<line>
(Tr*n**ated).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The transit*** from *rint to el**tronic cul*ure happens by open*ng cha*ne*, a* a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
alway*, o**ered by ar* in genera* and litera*y creation as the place where *ne rea*s
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
insc**ption* of *ubjectivity (Ibid). A*cord*ng to *artin-Barber* (19*7) the crisis that
</line>
<line>
c*nstitutes us "is no* *nly a social fact, bu* a reason *or bei*g, fabric t*mporalities an* spaces,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
memorie* *nd imagined th*t so f*r **ly
</line>
<line>
t*e *e**ing *oic* **ard." (VILLAÇA, 2002, *pud
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
MARTIN-BARBERO, p.259, **anslated).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The co*stant and int*nse chang*s in the *niverse of w*iting led Marshall McLuh*n
</line>
<line>
predict the **d of the "Gutenberg Gala*y" and the establishment o* a "gl**al elec*ronic and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
planetary *illage", arising especia*ly from
</line>
<line>
the 60s a* the *iring o* TV signals,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
comm*n**ations sate*lites networking, the *mergence of a portable video and following
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ho*e *ecorder, a micro*omputer, tele**t*cs, *nteg**ted digital networks, *nt*ractive TV,
</line>
<line>
mobile phones, H*TV (Hi*h Definitio* TV). (VILL*Ç*, 2002, pp.17-18).
</line>
<line>
It is obvious that *y t*e transposit*on *f *ach phase *hat the book g**s from **s
</line>
<line>
*nvention, the*e is a growing concern wit* t*e im*rovem**t and achievement of a more
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
effi*ien*ly des*gned *hich i* *h*
</line>
<line>
legacy of every discovery. And it is not *o *ifferent *hen
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ma*k*nd sees a*d *nters the *hase of the d*gital boo*. In this pe*spective, Villaça (200*, p.18)
</line>
<line>
****ents,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The *-book can be ev*lua*ed
</line>
<line>
*rom several angles: ea*e of co**ilation in spatial
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
terms, mul*imedia enrichment, quali** of inte*active **m*n*ion, level of f*eedom
</line>
<line>
af*orded, *u*li*i*s that ar* *istributed on d*ff*rent sup*orts. (Translated)
</line>
<line>
The e-book en*anc*s all p*e*io*s phases requiri*g *ew kinds of *eader and aut**r. It
</line>
<line>
req*ires a dy***ic and fluid r*a**ng f** fro* the linearity an* ho*izontality *f yore. There is
</line>
<line>
* rapprochement with the te** dialog*e *r co*ve*sation due to his fluid, deter*itorialized and
</line>
<line>
dynamic charac*e*, after all *he text los*s its fixity an* meets the pl**er to be upgrade*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
wrinkled and
</line>
<line>
cru*pl*d i.e., d*pped in oceanic world of cyber*p*ce. Nowadays, we can read
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
on i-Pads, i-Phone*, e-book*, PCs, laptops, ce*l **ones, etc. and no* ju*t in a s**g*e bracket.
</line>
<line>
*hese con*ideration* are lin**d to *é*y (2011, p.39) abo*t th* cu*rent text,
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Te**sina PI, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, *. 96-115, set/out. 201*
</line>
<line>
www4.fsanet.c*m.br/rev*st*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. Pires, E. C. *. Luqu*tti
</line>
<line>
102
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
For the co*te*porary text, fuelling online *orresp*ndence and
</line>
<line>
electronic
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
conferences, running n*tw*rk*,
</line>
<line>
fluid, deterritorialized, dipped in the oce*n
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
environm*nt of cy**rspace, this dynamic
</line>
<line>
text r*co*structs, but ot*e*wise *n
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*finitely *reater *cale and the c*-p*esence of **e mes*age and its *iving cont*x*
</line>
<line>
that c*ara*terizes oral com*unication. *gain, the cri*eri* change. Reaproximate
</line>
<line>
from those dialogu* or c*nversation: relevance depending on the time *f readers
</line>
<line>
*n* virtual *l*ces; brev*ty, by being ab*e to immedi**ely poin* o*t the *eferences;
</line>
<line>
ef*iciency by pr*viding s*rvice to the reader (and in pa*ticular help you n*vig*te)
</line>
<line>
*s the best way to be re*ognize* un*er *he *nformational flood. (Transla*e*)
</line>
<line>
Th* advent o* the digital age genera*es s*gni*i*ant impacts i* re*ding pat*erns. As **en
</line>
<line>
previ*u*ly, the curre*t reading is deterrit**ialized as V*llaça (2002, p.64) *ommen*s: "a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
d*parture from the traditio*a* and in*ivi*ual lived body, *nd a *hutdown of th* place,
</line>
<line>
* *e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ea*t* **d non*erb*l *asks." *ow, with the presen*e of th* electronic media and
</line>
<line>
its
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
aggregative struc*ure i* wh*ch numerous inn*vative *eature* com* in*o play: moving images,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*nimat*on's own words, the
</line>
<line>
presence of
</line>
<line>
voices, pag*s with multiple
</line>
<line>
outputs, emerge
</line>
<line>
* he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hy**rtext. The digital support, as Lé*y (2011) states, allows new types of reading and writin*
</line>
<line>
team.
</line>
<line>
Hypertex* termi*olo*y eme**es *s th* *efining *exts plac*d on the Web and which
</line>
<line>
have hyperlinks that lead browsers r*aders to othe* *nunc*ations and so o* through points of
</line>
<line>
convergence th*t Lévy (**11) calls kn*ts an* which **leuz* and Guattari (2011) c*ll
</line>
<line>
rhizomes: "o*pose joint and segmentary lin** *o be lines of **ight, movements of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
desterr*t*riali*ation an* de*tratification. Accordi*g to the authors, the rhizome is
</line>
<line>
an
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
a*tigeneal*gy."
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Hy**rtext does not m*mic reality according to Deleuz* and Guatta*i (2011), but it is a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
map*ing for the map t* be
</line>
<line>
**en, connectabl* in all its dimensions, *etach*ble, r*versi*le,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
susceptible to recei*e *onstant
</line>
<line>
changes, diff*rent from tracing which is ful*y e*closed
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*revers*ble,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The rhizome proc*ed* *y variati*n, e*pansion, co*quest, *apture, sting. Opposite
</line>
<line>
to t*e *ra*hics, d*aw*ng or photog*aph, and tracing, rh**ome *e*ers to a map *hat
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ust be produ*ed, constructed, alway* det*chable,
</line>
<line>
conne*table, *e*ersible, and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
modifiab*e, wi*h multiple inputs and outputs, *ith t*ei* lines of *light. (Ibid, p.*3,
</line>
<line>
Translated).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*e r*izo*e emerges w*th *t*ong p*sitioning a
</line>
<line>
against hierarc*ic*l co*muni*a*ion
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
cen*ered system* and pre-es*ablishe* c*nnections. ** other words, it *s a non-hierarchica* and
</line>
<line>
non sig*ifi**nt eccentric system with*ut an org**izing mem*r* or *eneral *u*oma*on only
</line>
<line>
defined *y organization states (Ibid).
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Ter*sin*, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-115, set./o**. *016
</line>
<line>
*ww4.f*anet.com.br/revi*t*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Ic*s Optimization and Informational Flow Incre*s*ng: Impacts on High School Da*ly Life
</line>
<line>
103
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*e lan*uag* evolution brings with it *he adv*nt of *ew commu*icati*n technolo*ies:
</line>
<line>
**gita* Media o* H*pe*m*dia. Ac*ordi*g to C*utinho and Silveira Jr. (**08), hyp*r*edia
</line>
<line>
along wi*h their m*lticode res*urces, adds *ew possibilities to the co*munica*ion *cenery f*r
</line>
<line>
gath*ri*g the thre* matrices of lan*uage: visual, voiced an* oral. *inally, *here is the noti*n of
</line>
<line>
hypertext whose prec*rsor Va**evar *ush *laims that it rep**duces the structure of the
</line>
<line>
huma* mind. L*v* (1993, p.33) shares the idea ** Bush and defi*es hypertext as follows,
</line>
<line>
set of knots connec*ed by links. **ots can be word*, pa**s, pictures, graph*cs or
</line>
<line>
parts of g*a*hi*s, s**nd *eque*ces, *omp*ex docu*ents **at may the*s*lv*s be
</line>
<line>
hypertext. *he *tem* of informati*n are not linked linearly *s in a rope wi*h knot*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
but each
</line>
<line>
of t*e*, or most *f them,
</line>
<line>
extends the*r *onnections such a st*r, *n
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
reti*ular way. S*rf the hyp*rtex*, *her*fo*e, me*n* *rawing a route on a *etwork
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
that can be *s complicate* as poss*ble becaus* *ach
</line>
<line>
of them may hold whole a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*etwo*k. (Tra*slate*)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2.3 Re*der-Book-Reading Re*a*ionships: Wha* *s new?
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Readi*g w*s not the same *lwa*s *nd e**n ever*where. As explained so far, it goes
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*hrough many c*nstan* t*a*sformations
</line>
<line>
ap*lie* *o a*y support as it is possible
</line>
<line>
readi*g a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
printed text, e*ectronic, a pict**e, a pho*ograph, etc., a*d i* is done by diff*rent *ays. The
</line>
<line>
*eading practice *ri*gs a history on *tsel*, *inc* Western *en and wom*n do n** alw*ys read
</line>
<line>
the same *ay. Uncountabl* *ransforma*ions (and revolutions) metamor*hosed *he*r ges*ures,
</line>
<line>
habit*, pre*erences, con*eptions, etc. *ccording to Fachi*etto (200*, p.11), th* cu**ent
</line>
<line>
revolution w* ar* *xper*encing is the e**ctronic tran*mission of texts and w*ys of r*ading it
</line>
<line>
*mposes. And h* continue*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
She
</line>
<line>
redef*nes the "mate*iali*y" o* work* by brea*ing **e ph*s*ca*
</line>
<line>
link exis*ed
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
b*tween the pri*ted object and writing it conveys. The rea*er be*ins to dominate
</line>
<line>
the appearanc* and ***out of text th*t appears on the computer screen. The
</line>
<line>
gestures change accord*ng to the tim*s and *lace*, o*je*ts and reasons *o read.
</line>
<line>
New a*titud** are in*ented *nd ot*ers are extinguished.
</line>
<line>
For L*vy (20*3) hypert**t reader is more activ* than *he printed *ne. *e says that
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
even befor* interpretin* the *eani*g of a particular t*x*, "read on screen" is to se*d
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
co*mand to a
</line>
<line>
com*uter so that i* *rojects such a partial acc**pli*hment of th* tex* in
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
br*ght surfac*. The idea of par*i*l under*ie* the assumptio* tha* th*
</line>
<line>
t*xt *diting is m*de
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
differ*nt*y fr*m the p*in*e* version where contents are
</line>
<line>
complete. *ur**erm*r*,
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hypertextua* reading a*lows sp*ed besides being processed without limits d*e to its infinite
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Re*. FSA, Teresina PI, v. 1*, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-*1*, set/*u*. 2016
</line>
<line>
www4.fsane*.*om.b*/re*ist*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. Pires, E. C. F. *uqu*tti
</line>
<line>
104
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
**ailabl* *i*ks, and interbreeding infinite possibilities of non-**quential o* non-l*near ma*ner
</line>
<line>
as well.
</line>
<line>
We c*n notice t*at *he g**at disti*ction be**een text and hypertext is the *peed that
</line>
<line>
the tool* and information are *cce*s*d. A simpl* mouse click on the highlighte* *o*ds on a
</line>
<line>
*ebsi**, called ho*word*, is much faster t*** a s*arch in *he *ictio*ary or if it is d*ffic**t to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
foun* what we search *n pa**icu*a* a
</line>
<line>
ho*e page, we can immediately jump to a*oth*r o*e.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*is redr**i** o* the processes of *riting and readi*g ** *h*t *évy (199*) calls n*vigation.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Neverthe*ess, if the hyp*rt*xt consists in trails, possible p*ths of reading, so the
</line>
<line>
*ext
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
can be under*t*od *s a particula*
</line>
<line>
reading of a hyper*ext perform*d thro*gh the cli**ings
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
produced. *c*ordi*g to *evy (2003, p.4*), "*h* browser thu* participa*es i* t*e w*iting, or a*
</line>
<line>
*east ed*ting the *ex* read" reads "as *e determ*nes *ts f*nal orga*ization." (Translated).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ther*fore, hyper*ext
</line>
<line>
appears a* a b*eak fro* reading
</line>
<line>
canon*zed se*uenti*l m*de*
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
The *eleph*ne c*nnectio* terminal* and
</line>
<line>
computer memo*ies, the reticulation of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*igit*l transmission, a*plify each day a glob*l "cyberspac*" i* which e*ery p*ece
</line>
<line>
of in*ormat*on is found in *irtual *ontact w*th any other...This t*end i* actio*
</line>
<line>
there more than 2* years, always m**e itself felt incr*asingly, their effects *urin*
</line>
<line>
the *oming decades. Ongoing developments converge to form a new means o*
</line>
<line>
commun*cation, t*i*king and working for hum*n s*cietie*... (Transl*ted)
</line>
<line>
Th*s *uotati** points to a ne* way to fee* t*e effect* and employ dig*tal technology in
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the e**ca*io*al environmen* *hat is where th*y feed m*des
</line>
<line>
*f knowl*dge and perception of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the *orl*. Acco*d*ng to *o*el*i and Motter (201*), man always establishes v**tu*l
</line>
<line>
relatio*ships *ith *artners, throu*h imag*s and ob*ect* from *is imaginar* wo*ld. Howeve*,
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Re*. FSA, Tere*ina, v. 13, n. *, art. 6, p. *6-11*, set./out. 2016
</line>
<line>
*ww4.*sane*.c*m.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Icts Optimization *nd Informational Flo* Inc*easing: Impact* on High School Daily Life
</line>
<line>
1*5
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t*e technology
</line>
<line>
has come *o increase and mate*ialize the activa*i*n process of b*nd*, links,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
knots, e*c.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*e great dilem*a *s h*w to *r**ni*e hyper*exts *hat set educational environm*nt*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
such a way *ha* it does
</line>
<line>
not limit th* **p**rati*n *nd crea*iv*ty of s*uden*s and ensure t**
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ac*ie**me*ts of learnin* obje*ti*es. Thu*, Pires and Veit (2006, a*ud SILVA, 2*10, p.18)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
suggest *hat in an educatio*al conte*t,
</line>
<line>
th* hyp*rtext should be organized in order to b*
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
flexible content presentatio* mode* w*ich can
</line>
<line>
prov*de the
</line>
<line>
l * nk
</line>
<line>
bet*een d*fferent ty**s of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
information to be *isplayed in a f*rm of a te*t, image, sound, among *thers.
</line>
<line>
There are certain diff*cult sci*n*i*ic concept* to b* lear*ed by engagi*g a high de*r*e
</line>
<line>
of abstraction a*d concentrat*on, acc*rding to Tavare* (2008). T*us, *i*va (*010) **y* *hat
</line>
<line>
the use of co*puting resourc*s, such a* hyperme*i*, *an enable the comprehens*on of these
</line>
<line>
concepts sin*e it al*ow* flexibility of study and interaction between the conten* s*udied and
</line>
<line>
*he s*ude*t. This *n*er*ction o*curs through applicati*n of *he co**ept of view* in th* for* of
</line>
<line>
a*imated images *nd sounds simulati*n*. Such flexibility can avoid *ognitive ov*rload
</line>
<line>
st*d**ts wit* ages, *bilities and level* of le**ning var*** as each one f*llo*s its own pac* of
</line>
<line>
study.
</line>
<line>
In the opin*on of Tavares (2006), hypert*xt becomes a compre*e*sive tool as it allows
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
a gr*ater
</line>
<line>
number
</line>
<line>
of p*ople *o vi*w
</line>
<line>
and un*erstand
</line>
<line>
natura* phenomena which is
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
compr**e*s*o* that once wo*ld be ***erve*
</line>
<line>
only for *hose st*dents *ith a *reat *b*tra*tiv*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ability.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Silva (2010) argues that the **cess to contents in an ide** hypertext can be flexible,
</line>
<line>
interactive and non-sequential *m*ng t*emselves and between them and *he student a* well.
</line>
<line>
*ccord*ng ** the aut*or, this p*oce*s is *referably *ar*ied out in acco**ance to the indi*idual
</line>
<line>
needs and learning styles *f each stu*ent or group of student* and n*t ** * formal sequence
</line>
<line>
es*ablishe* by the te*cher. And h* co*tinues (I*id, p.1*), "this functiona* way of presenting
</line>
<line>
the in*ormat*on in a h*pe*te*t impl*es th* need t* develop new skil*s of autono*y *nd critical
</line>
<line>
use of t** study material, allowing flexibilit* *o th* learning d*ve**pment."
</line>
<line>
Silva (2*10) asse**s that hypertext can also f*c**itate the *ducation*l process b*
</line>
<line>
a*lowing students to become familiar wi*h information technolog* we mu*t increa***gly c*me
</line>
<line>
across in your daily life.
</line>
<line>
2 .* Infor*ation and communication technolog*es in school field
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. *SA, Teres**a PI, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-11*, set/out. 201*
</line>
<line>
ww*4.fsanet.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. Pires, E. C. F. Lu*u**ti
</line>
<line>
106
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
In *he curr*n* *ra,
</line>
<line>
d*e to the eme*genc* of new communication enviro*ment
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ed**ti*n of in*ormation, socio-cultural pra*tices of re**in*/writing *ave suffered l*rge
</line>
<line>
an*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
si*nificant *h*nges, shar*e*i*g the debat* at the University conc**nin* the docent training
</line>
<line>
and *ra*tices. In th** s*udy, **a*hers *f mo*her to*g*e in the setting of new c*gnitive ec*log*
</line>
<line>
r*quires a c*nsta*t dialogue, a* intersec*ion point be*we*n reading practices and mom*nts of
</line>
<line>
re**ection of this *r*cess.
</line>
<line>
Thus, considering *elevant ** understand and *iscuss new teaching methods for
</line>
<line>
te*ching/lea*ning p**cess opt*mizati*n in a *y**rtextual perspe*tive *y th* ins*rtion and go*d
</line>
<line>
*s* of Information and *ommun**a*ion Technologies (ICTs), lies this research, as well as
</line>
<line>
*ow to integ*ate *nvestigative t*o*s to **in* t*ese is*ues to a breakthrough effo*ts.
</line>
<line>
The school context suffers t*e most *ignifica*t **a*ge* w*t* the advent of Informati**
</line>
<line>
and *ommun*cation T*chnologie* (ICTs). Th*s real*ty confirms, th*refore, deep changes in
</line>
<line>
re*der and a*thors*ip profiles as wel* as the roles o* teach*r *nd stu*ent. *** forms of study
</line>
<line>
*nd knowledg* acquisiti*n occur more openly. A*cording *o Almeid* & Menezes (2004, p.1,
</line>
<line>
Tr*nslated),
</line>
<line>
Exploring the p*ten*ial of ICTs du*ing i*s daily li*e, p*rt*cu*arly with the Internet,
</line>
<line>
the s*hool op*ns for new r*lations*ips with kno*ledge, exper*encing the shared
</line>
<line>
comm*nication and th* info*mation exc*ange with oth*r area* of kn*wledge
</line>
<line>
whi** have t*e same inte*ests.
</line>
<line>
Enh*nc** by new t*chnolog*cal resou*ces, education c** bring improvements,
</line>
<line>
**ansformations, although it is ch*llen*ing for *oth teac*ers and *ch**l as a w*ole. Among
</line>
<line>
the *a*t d*ff**ulties of the pedagog*ca* practic*s reconf*guration *s the need *f Digital Literacy
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(or Multiliteracies). Th*re
</line>
<line>
is urg**cy in detecting th* ne*ds of Multi*iteraci*s so tha* the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*sertion of new i*for**tion *nd c*mm*nica**on technologies can b* *ffective
</line>
<line>
in school
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
amb*ence fulf*llin* *ts tr*e role o* *he t*aching-learning process o**imizer. In this br*akd*wn,
</line>
<line>
M*rqu*s (1993, p.109) states, "[...] learning is colle*tive const**ction assum*d by sp**if*c
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
g***ps in the br*ade*
</line>
<line>
dynamics of societ*, w*ich,
</line>
<line>
in turn, built fro* *he i*divi**al and *s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
group *e*rning."
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The teaching practic** ren*wal can be detected
</line>
<line>
by the time such
</line>
<line>
**ui*me*t
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
sign*fica*t*y m**ify the lo*k o* the *eache* in *ront of hi*
</line>
<line>
p*actic*, his c*nceptions
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
e**cation,
</line>
<line>
ba*ed on Sacri*tan (1999, p.7*, Translated), "[...] t*e teach*r is responsib*e f*r
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
sh*ping the practice, but t*is is the int**section of dif***ent contexts."
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FS*, Teresin*, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-**5, set./out. 2*1*
</line>
<line>
w*w*.fsanet.*o*.br/revi*t*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Icts O*timi*ation and Informa*ion** Flow I*creasing: Imp*cts on High School Daily Life
</line>
<line>
1*7
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
School must change its *on*eption of literacy s* that off**s rea* *pportunitie* for
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
indiv*dua*s and co*munities who *re o* the m**g*ns
</line>
<line>
of glo*al s*ciet*. School needs t*
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro -
</line>
<line>
Brazil in Ma*ch, 20*4, compr*sing Institu*o F*deral
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Fluminense (F*umine*se Federal
</line>
<line>
Institute) p**fess*rs and students *rom Agribusin*s*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Comput*ng, Agriculture an* Cat*le
</line>
<line>
Raising
</line>
<line>
course*. This se*tion starts presenting data
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
conce*ning the prof***ors and th*ir d*aling with N*CTs, and later, concer*i** studen*s.
</line>
<line>
3.1 Te**hers
</line>
<line>
In o*der to set*le a v**wpo*nt of the s*en**y surrounding the Ins*itut* where the survey
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
took *lace, par*icipan*s an*wered a structured e**ct*onic questionnaire. was 136 students It
</line>
<line>
and 27 professors in tota*. It is notewort*y that the school where *he work hap*ened is both
</line>
<line>
sec*nda*y a*d technical. *n other words, students from high school have th* opportunity to
</line>
<line>
have a profession e**n before the gr**uat**n.
</line>
<line>
A*alysin* the questionnai*es *t is p**si*le to concl*de that 8*% *rofe*sor* a*e *ast*rs
</line>
<line>
*r doct*rs *r *ven ha*e a kind of specialization course *hich is not c*mmon in *ther teachi*g
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
segment* of education in
</line>
<line>
Brazil, for ex*mp*e, municipal an* sta*e. It *h*ws **e federa*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
se*ment of ed*cation *eads Bra*ilian educat*onal ran*ing so th*t *nvests in pro*essional
</line>
<line>
train*ng.
</line>
<line>
The **udy aims to *nalyse *ow digital immigrant teac*e*s *eal wit* ICTs adve*t and
</line>
<line>
how they have b**n u*ing th*m i* t*e daily school to *or* the di**tal n*ti*es stud*nts,
</line>
<line>
conside*ing **e definition of Pr*snky (2001) who *onsi*ers **migrants th* ones bor* b*fo*e
</line>
<line>
the las* de*a*es of th* twentie*h centu*y an*, at some *oint, adopted many or most aspects *f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
th* new techno*ogy a*d
</line>
<line>
d*g*tal the *n*s b*rn af*er the *ast decades of the twentieth century.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
This way, it would be app*o*riate *o analys* the partici*ant ages *n order to define if they are
</line>
<line>
di**tal nat*ves or i*migrants. I* **i* case, th* professors *f the I*stitution obs*rved are 1*0%
</line>
<line>
digital immigrants *aving few *r *one experience regardin* education *echn*logies so that
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Ter*sina *I, v. 1*, n. 5, *rt. 6, p. 96-115, set/out. 2016 www4.fsanet.com.br/r*vista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. *. *ir*s, E. C. F. Luquetti
</line>
<line>
10*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
37% ass*rt helding *efres*e* courses in digital *nvir*nment ag*inst *3% th*t assert
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
op**sit*. Th*s is *orris*me
</line>
<line>
fo* re*eal*ng a l*ck of
</line>
<line>
incentives and e**n investments to this
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ind of *rain*ng to form t**chers an* cri*i** prep*red to dea* w*t* *ew tec*nolo**es, a* sho*n
</line>
<line>
by Street (2012).
</line>
<line>
I* is curiou* to noti*e *hat the *ame *ercenta*e *hat claim to **ve traini*g *oc*sed *n
</line>
<line>
the use of ICTs claim to have *r*in*ng *long t*ese line*, i.e. l*ss than half of th* individ*als
</line>
<line>
(37%) wa* motivated to *ook f*r w*ys to suit the new *emands of society, ** stu*ents. This
</line>
<line>
cut reflects Herm*nt (**12) th*ughts which states that a*low**g students to have *heir classes
</line>
<line>
tau*ht in old forms, *s the same a* allow *he sac**fice of th*ir Multilitera*ies, *s to depri*e
</line>
<line>
th** of a **arning by making s*gnific*nt k*owledge *nd usa*e *f this r****entary compar*d
</line>
<line>
to thos* who c*u*d impro** their *ultimod*l skills.
</line>
<line>
The following table shows the loc*tion wh*re t*e p**t*cipants had techni*a* training or
</line>
<line>
practice for using ICTs as teaching tools:
</line>
<line>
Table 1 - Location *f the *r*i*ing cou**e *n ICTs as *ea*hi*g *o*ls
</line>
<line>
Locatio* of the training course Occurrences Percentage
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
J*b
</line>
<line>
5
</line>
<line>
50%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
On*i*e specific course
</line>
<line>
4
</line>
<line>
40%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Co*puter school
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
<line>
20%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
U**v*rsity
</line>
<line>
2
</line>
<line>
20%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
C*ngr*ss, Meetings, S**inar*
</line>
<line>
2
</line>
<line>
*0%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Others
</line>
<line>
1
</line>
<line>
10%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
In or**r *o *e pos*ible an objective *nalys*s, it was impor*ant *onsider *he real *umber
</line>
<line>
of oc*urrenc*s rather *han only percentage. Among the *went*-seven partic*p**ts onl* sixteen
</line>
<line>
answere* this questio*. So, we considered the rema*nin* eleven non-holde*s of *he *raining
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ourse since the* do
</line>
<line>
not com*en* abo*t this. The *or*yi*g fact is that only two p*ofe*sors
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ad this *i*d of improvement at the Uni*ersity. T*is *hows *h*t there is still *uch to do a*out
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
teacher pr*fess*onal suitability to *he current per*od marked
</line>
<line>
by *he pres*nce of ICTs. And
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ev*n the ac*demi* events a*e s*ill l*cking consid***ng that only *wo hav* acquir*d this kind *f
</line>
<line>
knowledge in an aca*emic *vent.
</line>
<line>
**azilian U*iver*ities (at a whole) perhaps *ave *ot assume* t*e resp*nsi*i*it* of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
pro*iding this type
</line>
<line>
o* t*aining yet in diff*rent
</line>
<line>
d*gree courses and
</line>
<line>
neithe* the *chools
</line>
<line>
ha*e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
enco*raged t*eir commun*ties to se*rch this k*nd of knowled*e, causing teachers
</line>
<line>
discour*gement, r*fl*cting what Es*eve (1999, In ALO*SO, Educ. Soc., Campinas, vol. 29,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Nº. 104 - Special,
</line>
<line>
pp.747-7*8, may. 2008) calls the materi*lization of the feeling
</line>
<line>
o*
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teresina, v. 13, n. 5, ar*. 6, p. 96-115, set./ou*. 2*16
</line>
<line>
www4.fsan*t.**m.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Icts Opti*ization *nd Informationa* F*ow I**reasing: *mpa*ts on Hig* School Daily Life
</line>
<line>
1*9
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
uneasiness *ha* are "[...] **e re*c*i*n* ** all the teach**s as a p*o*essional grou* "misfit", *s a
</line>
<line>
re*ult of soci*l, *ol**i*al and eco*omic chan*e* o* our t*me [...]."
</line>
<line>
An*th*r poin* we cons*der r**eva*t in this analysis ** a*ou* *ow particip*nt* use
</line>
<line>
**te**et and computer (*nd if they use *h*m) a*d how *ft*n as *ell as shown in t*e fol*owing
</line>
<line>
*a*l*:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ta*le 2 - Use of PC *nd internet
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Place
</line>
<line>
Nº
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
<line>
Goal
</line>
<line>
Nº
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
<line>
A*ces* Nº
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
<line>
( h)
</line>
<line>
Less an
</line>
<line>
hou*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
At ho*e
</line>
<line>
16
</line>
<line>
59% Entertainment
</line>
<line>
11
</line>
<line>
41%
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
p er
</line>
<line>
*eek
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1
</line>
<line>
t*
</line>
<line>
2
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
At work
</line>
<line>
*4
</line>
<line>
5*% School researchers
</line>
<line>
13
</line>
<line>
*8%
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
<line>
hours
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2
</line>
<line>
to
</line>
<line>
4
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Cybercaf*/Lan
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
Update/*nformation
</line>
<line>
20
</line>
<line>
74%
</line>
<line>
1
</line>
<line>
3%
</line>
<line>
hou*s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hous e *
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
Ot*ers
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
<line>
friend* a*d
</line>
<line>
16
</line>
<line>
5*%
</line>
<line>
4
</line>
<line>
15%
</line>
<line>
hours
</line>
<line>
prof*ssiona**
</line>
<line>
8 to 1*
</line>
<line>
Ty*ing texts
</line>
<line>
*2
</line>
<line>
4*%
</line>
<line>
4
</line>
<line>
15%
</line>
<line>
h*u*s
</line>
<line>
Mo * e
</line>
<line>
W *r k
</line>
<line>
21
</line>
<line>
77%
</line>
<line>
than 10
</line>
<line>
1*
</line>
<line>
5*%
</line>
<line>
ho**s
</line>
<line>
Others
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
It i* *otable the pro*essors u*e t** PC and c*nside* it an i*portant tool on their daily
</line>
<line>
life, so that 100% use it to many goa*s. T*e pl*** of gre*test use of the comp*t** by
</line>
<line>
pr*f*s*ors is a* hom* and at wo*k, 59% and 52% respectively. R*g*r*in* the goals, m*st of
</line>
<line>
them use the tool (**) to u*d*te or *etti*g infor*ation (*4%), contact friends, relativ*s *nd
</line>
<line>
prof*ssio*als (59%) and f*r la*our *urp*ses (77%). Concer*in* hou*s of acces*, 85% clai*
</line>
<line>
sp*nd 5 to 10 hours * week, highlight*ng that among **ese, 55% spend m*re than 10 hours a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
week using PC and internet. This is a
</line>
<line>
**oup that recognizes the imp*rtan*e o* new featu*es
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
and tools in t*e acquisiti*n and enhance*ent of knowledge, fact reveal*d in the a*ount *f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
time spent on PC and th* Internet, conf**ming the d*fin**ion of Pren**y (2001) about digita*
</line>
<line>
immigrants *s alr*ady p*evio*sly detailed.
</line>
<line>
*o*e*er, t*ere *s an intriguin* detai*. When asked *bout the use o* NICTs b* the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
professors *f diff**ent
</line>
<line>
disciplines,
</line>
<line>
students **ve*l contr*di*tory d*ta: 66% of students from
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
*he total 136 participan*s st*te th*t NICTs *re used only by the Comput*ng *r*f*ssors as they
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Teresina PI, v. 13, *. 5, art. *, p. *6-115, set/*ut. 20*6 www4.fsanet.com.br/r*vista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. *. R. Pires, E. C. F. Luquetti
</line>
<line>
1*0
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*om**se a spec*fic technica* area. This discre**ncy has become mor* *a*ked over the years
</line>
<line>
in the Institution f*r allocati*g the use of new *echnologies on*y t* Computing *rofesso*s,
</line>
<line>
excl*ding Agr*c**tur*l and Agribusines* cou*ses. For the rema**ing 34% who state the
</line>
<line>
contra*y, us*** NICTs *s *he fact that some te*chers *ake us* of features like slides
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
presentations via Power Point or Prezi. Actual**, these resources a*e *sed
</line>
<line>
to avoi* the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
whiteboard.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ul*ili*er*cies practi*ing and tr*ining cou*ses for the *rofe*sors must be ins*alled
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
urgently. According to Kenski (2007), th*re *s di*ect relationship *etw**n a
</line>
<line>
e*ucation and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
te*hnol*gy as
</line>
<line>
they both a*e pres*nt all the time during th* *duca*ional *rocess, si*ce
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
di*ciplin*s planning until the dev**opmen* of curriculum propo*al to ce*tifi*ate stu*ents who
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
have completed a course. B*lloni (2001) states the s*hoo* chal*enge is to e*hance
</line>
<line>
* he
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
Instit*tion off**s su*h as Computing and Agr*culture and Catt*e Raising. **
</line>
<line>
does *ot mean
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
**sen*e of *irls, but th** are min*rity con**derin* these **o areas. Ag*s vary from 15 *o 16
</line>
<line>
years *ld wh**h shows they *r* d*gita* nat*ves at a whole, i.e. hav* innate ability to *se virtual
</line>
<line>
tech*ologies.
</line>
<line>
Students from secondary school, or h*g* school, experience a pe*i*d of time in which
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
individuals start m*turi*g
</line>
<line>
**e in*e*l*ct. *hi* ed*cational segment is a *t*at*gic p*riod
</line>
<line>
to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
analyse the kind of formation s*ud*nts have had and if school and profe*sors are **epared to
</line>
<line>
dea* *ith a commu*i*y who de*and new ped*gog*cal practic*s.
</line>
<line>
After i*enti**cation, stu*ents t*lked abo*t the*r h*bits *urin* time off as *he follo**ng
</line>
<line>
tab*e shows:
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. F*A, Tere*i*a, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-115, s*t./o*t. 2016
</line>
<line>
w*w4.fsa*et.com.br/revi*t*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Icts Optimizati** an* I*format*on*l *low Incr*asing: Impacts on High *chool Daily Lif*
</line>
<line>
*1*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Tab** 3 - *cti*ities *uring t**e off
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Answers
</line>
<line>
Occurrenc*s
</line>
<line>
Percentage
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*V, f*lms, TV series
</line>
<line>
14
</line>
<line>
10%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Reading
</line>
<line>
*3
</line>
<line>
17%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Study*ng
</line>
<line>
*9
</line>
<line>
21%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Interne*/So*ial *etwork*
</line>
<line>
50
</line>
<line>
37%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
L*isure and social
</line>
<line>
21
</line>
<line>
15%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*cti*iti*s
</line>
<line>
137
</line>
<line>
10*%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Tota*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Observing *hese **ta it i* possib*e to sa* that *7% *f student* sp*nd part *f their *ime
</line>
<line>
off accessing internet/social n*t*or** a* they a*e digit*l natives. *here was a moment during
</line>
<line>
the research pr*fessors wer* a*k*d ab*ut the pos*ible maj** difficulties faced during the
</line>
<line>
*nsertion *f t*e NICTs an* they attributed i* to *t*de*ts. Accordin* to **e *rofessors, stud*nts
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
do not *ave previ*us knowledge of thi* i*sue and d* *ot h*ve acce*s to in*er*e*
</line>
<line>
*ithe*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Nevertheless, the table s**ws i* is a wrong theory. And *t *ou*d not be di*ferent sin*e *00% of
</line>
<line>
students state inte*net pla*s an important role on their lives s* that t*ey access it all the day-
</line>
<line>
l*n* at h*me, at school, on t*e phone, etc.
</line>
<line>
Anothe* point to c*nsider ** about the us* of in*er*et. As shown in th* following
</line>
<line>
table, st*d*nts op*nions are vary:
</line>
<line>
Table 4 - Us* of internet
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*tility
</line>
<line>
Occurren*e*
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
E*tertain**nt
</line>
<line>
130
</line>
<line>
95%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Inf*rmation
</line>
<line>
122
</line>
<line>
89%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Learni*g
</line>
<line>
137
</line>
<line>
100%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Soci*l ne*works
</line>
<line>
1*2
</line>
<line>
89%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Comm*nication
</line>
<line>
*20
</line>
<line>
8*%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The *p*ions li*te* above are *alid concern*ng i*ternet so th*t a*e many ot*e*
</line>
<line>
oc*urrences. P*rticipant* c*uld choose more than one o*tion. H*wev*r, not*ble is the fact that
</line>
<line>
all **e *tudents associate l*a*ni*g t* internet. It shows st*den*s have remarkable potent*a* for
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
using the ne* t*chnol*gies even though they do not have suit*ble gui*anc* of professors to
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
do it r**h*. *eg*rding the other option*, *t is cl*ar in*ernet i* an im*orta*t res*urce in
</line>
<line>
st*dents\ daily li*es whether at school or out*i*e it.
</line>
<line>
This research a*proaches the relati*nship b*tween *ress*d a*d electr*ni* h*lders.
</line>
<line>
Ther*fo*e, *t was nece*s*r* investigate students readin* habit*, *heir pre*erences, as listed **
</line>
<line>
t*e table be**w:
</line>
<line>
*ev. *SA, Teresina PI, v. 13, n. 5, ar*. 6, p. *6-11*, set/out. 2016 w*w*.*s*net.com.br/re**sta
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. *i*es, E. C. F. Luquetti
</line>
<line>
112
</line>
<line>
Ta*le 5 - Reading habits
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ma*er*al
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
<line>
*requenc*
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
<line>
Ho*der
</line>
<line>
%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ewspa*e*
</line>
<line>
16%
</line>
<line>
Every*ay
</line>
<line>
74%
</line>
<line>
*ressed
</line>
<line>
74%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Magazin*s
</line>
<line>
19%
</line>
<line>
Once * we*k
</line>
<line>
10%
</line>
<line>
Electron*c
</line>
<line>
2*%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Books
</line>
<line>
4*%
</line>
<line>
Once a qua*ter
</line>
<line>
8%
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ot*ers
</line>
<line>
17%
</line>
<line>
O*ce e*ery 6
</line>
<line>
4%
</line>
<line>
months
</line>
<line>
4%
</line>
<line>
Once a yea*
</line>
<line>
Never
</line>
<line>
0
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Da*a listed on t*ble 5 allows us to *ealize *4% ** the stu*ents read for ***as*re *nd
</line>
<line>
prefer pres*ed r*ad*ng in order to be more c*mfortable. Accordin* to them, electr*ni* holders
</line>
<line>
ha*e disadvanta*es such as bri*ht*ess, appliance *ea*er, and i* *a*e of blackout there ar* time
</line>
<line>
res*ric*i**s. The ones who assert reading i* low *re*uencies (26%), *onsider reading on*y if
</line>
<line>
there is a manip*lation of an object, new*papers, books, magazine*, fo* ins*ance. These ones
</line>
<line>
read for a sp*cific purpose: studying, so th*y prefer electro**c reading becau** *t is more
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
flexible, non-linear, and they *ave the possibility to change
</line>
<line>
the topi* or issue if they f*el
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
bored as w*ll. *t sh*ws pressed an* electronic reading* coexist peace**lly be*a**e each
</line>
<line>
on e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
pla** a *is**nct role dependin* on the individual *e*ds.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
F*nis*i*g thi* talking, students ha* a *pace *o e*pre*s their op*nion about h*w and if
</line>
<line>
NIC*s insertion could h*lp a*ong the tea*hing-le*rning proces* as li*t*d below:
</line>
<line>
Table 6 - N*CTs a*d teaching-learning proces*
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
At fir*t *t is nec*ssary to *oi*t a di*cr*pancy ou*: 85% of st*dents agree *o the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
import**c* of us*ng NICTs along *ea*h*ng-le*rning **ocess wher*as
</line>
<line>
15% do n*t a*ree with
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
this. *a*ed *n *ther se*tion* of *he questi*nnaire stude**s ***wered,
</line>
<line>
*e can
</line>
<line>
ens*r* **% of
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
them do not k*ow how to define *his concept. Su*h con*radic*ion is d*e to the fa*t *h*t, ev*n
</line>
<line>
*houg* *hey cann*t de*ine, they under**and the im*ortance of settling new practices *nabling
</line>
<line>
a meaningful and enjoy*b*e learning.
</line>
<line>
Regarding th* co**ributions by *n*erting NICTs in school ambience, specifically,
</line>
<line>
along the tea*hing-learni*g *rocess, 48% of **udents *rese*t** relevant opinion* such as
</line>
<line>
*ev. FSA, Teres*n*, v. 13, *. 5, art. 6, p. 9*-11*, set./out. 2016 www4.*san*t.**m.*r/re****a
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Icts Optimiz*t*on and Informati*nal Flow Increas*ng: *mpact* o* High School Dail* Life
</line>
<line>
113
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dyna*ic **asses, teaching-le*rning innova*ions, motivat*ons and a chance *o have a studying
</line>
<line>
*loser to thei* inte*e*ts. The*e consider*tions reinforce S*iba (2010) thoug** wh*ch sa*s that
</line>
<line>
the greate*t impact of using new te**nologic*l pract*ces in c*assroom will lead student* to a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
new
</line>
<line>
lev*l o* knowledge which *ill a*low them to use the availab*e *ig***l tools *o
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
com*unicate
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
<line>
share e*pe*iences such * m*ltimodal in
</line>
<line>
and wide way. Ch*ices more *nd
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
**re *i*l base on techno*o*ic*l *ools and the idea of building and sha*ing knowle*ge itsel*
</line>
<line>
*ill also bas* on t*e use o* techn*logies.
</line>
<line>
4 CONCLUSION
</line>
<line>
This s*udy sho*s t*at professors did n*t receive guidan*e concerning the adoptio* of
</line>
<line>
new methods and teaching s*r*tegies during thei* f*rm*tion a*d keep on far away from it. S*,
</line>
<line>
they are unprepare* t* feed*a*k the constant *nd growi*g new ed*catio*a* demands which
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*eq*i*e inn*vations so that *ear*ing can
</line>
<line>
be me*ningfu*, e*joyabl*, fl*xi*le and more
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*o*izont*l *s *ell.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
W* coul* obser*e alo*g the present re*earc* tha* educati*n ha*e been *opin* wit*
</line>
<line>
*any proble*s, *nd perhaps the current g*neration sho** between n*tive and di*it*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
immigrants i*
</line>
<line>
t*e gre*tes* of all. For exam*le we can re*l*ze in B*azi**an e*ucation a gap
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
which remain* *tatic for *g*s: s*hool from ni*eteenth cen*ur*, p**fesso*s fro* twentieth and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*tudents from twenty-first. T*is situa*ion does
</line>
<line>
not change because profe*sor* without notice
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
pr*pagat* *rad**ional models and practices th*y exp*rienced along their fo*m*tion.
</line>
<line>
Far fr*m the*r t*ue role, p*o*essors tie *he*selv*s to s*l*-*ndulg**ce, and as time goes
</line>
<line>
by *eco*e more and more d*fficult to leave the c*mfort zone they are *laced. When *hey a*e
</line>
<line>
as*ed ab*ut this t*e answ*rs a*e un*nimous: Insti*utio* *espo*sib*lity, lack *f ma**rial, low
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
intellectual *evel of stu*ent* when,
</line>
<line>
a*tua*l*, it *s a sense of f*ee will, evo*ution, *orld
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
c*nception and the need *o ma*e an important part of a pr*ce*s, of a *ea*ity.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
So t*at the *se o* NI**s plays its educational ro*e to
</line>
<line>
pr*m*t* a learning i* such an
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
incidental *ay, by disc*vering, col*abora**ve, mea*ingf*l
</line>
<line>
and enj*ya*le,
</line>
<line>
there *ust be
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ig***icant i*vestm*nts in theor*tical and practical t*acher *raining
</line>
<line>
con*erning the u*e of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
digital environment. It me*ns t*e practice of con*inuing for*ation to pr*mote
</line>
<line>
these
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
pr*fessionals in *rder *o permit *he access to current r*adi*g as well *s discussions and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
reflections which *ead to the improvemen*
</line>
<line>
*f t*ei* prac*ices. There also must be a practic*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
train*n* such as a co*rse focusing on using NICT* i* teaching-learning process. Furt*erm*re,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i* is impo*tant to int*oduce n*w
</line>
<line>
cur**culum
</line>
<line>
purposes in *raduat*on course* which pre*a*e
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
R**. FSA, Ter**in* PI, v. 1*, n. 5, art. 6, p. *6-115, set/out. 2016
</line>
<line>
www4.f*a*et.com.b*/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
H. S. R. Pires, E. *. F. Luquetti
</line>
<line>
114
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
education profe*si*nals. This way, both in initial a*d in continuin* formation p*of*ssors *ill
</line>
<line>
be prepared.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
REFERENCES
</line>
<line>
*LMEI*A, M. E; *ENE*ES, L. [Princip*l\s role during the ICTs insertion *t scho*l:
</line>
<line>
expe*iences *n* lear*ing collaborati*e ne**]. O pa*el do *estor escol*r n* inc*rporação das
</line>
<line>
TIC n* escola: exper*ên*ias em const*uçã* e re*es colaborativas de apr*ndiza*em. São P*u*o,
</line>
<line>
P*CSP, 2004.
</line>
<line>
BELLONI, M. L. [What is *edia-*d*cat*on]. * que é mí*ia-ed*cação. Campina*: Autores
</line>
<line>
Associados, 2004.
</line>
<line>
C**RTIER, *.; *AV*LLO, E. G. (*rg.). [History of reading at western world]. H*stóri*
</line>
<line>
da *eitura no *undo ocident*l. São Pau*o: Ática, 1*9*.
</line>
<line>
CO*EL*I, E; MOTTER, R. M. B. [Te*hnolog*, *usic and po*try: A **pertextual
</line>
<line>
purp*s* for En**ish Language t*aching/lea*nin* process]. *ecnologia, música e poesia:
</line>
<line>
Uma p*oposta hipertext*al pa*a o pr**es*o de e**in*-aprendizagem d* Língua Ingles*. II
</line>
<line>
Sem*ná*io Nacion** em *studo* d* Li*gua*em: Diversidade, Ensino e Linguagem. ISSN
</line>
<line>
21*8-8200. UNI*ESTE - C*sca*el/PR, 2*10.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*OUTINHO, I; SIL*EIRA JR., P. *. [orgs.]. [Communication
</line>
<line>
*nd Visua* Culture].
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
C*mun*cação e Cu*tu*a Visual. E-papers: Rio de *aneiro, 2008.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
DELEUZE, G; *UA*TARI, F. Mil *latôs. [Capitalism and Sc*izop*renia]. *apit**ismo e
</line>
<line>
Esqu*zofrenia. Vol. 1. 2ª ed. T*aduçã* de Ana Lúcia de Olive*ra, **rélio Guer*a Neto e Célia
</line>
<line>
*into Costa. Rio ** Janeiro: *ditora 34, 2*11.
</line>
<line>
ESTEVE, J. M. [Teacher malaise - Classro*m and te*chers\ health]. O mal-e*tar *ocente
</line>
<line>
- A *ala de aula e a saúd* dos pr*fessores. *auru: Edusc, *9*9.
</line>
<line>
FACHI*E*TO, E. A. [**pertext and reading *r*ctices]. In: O hi*ertexto e as prá*ica* d*
</line>
<line>
leit*ra. Revista Le*ra Magna, Ano *2 - nº 0* - ISSN 1807-519*, 2005.
</line>
<line>
*ERMONT, *. [Multiliteracies, digital literac* a*d *eaching: *ew pr*c*i**s se*kin*
</line>
<line>
*igit*l wisdom]. M**tiletramentos, *etra*entos digita*s e ensino: novas prátic*s em busca de
</line>
<line>
sabedor*a digital. v*l. 5. nº *, 2012.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
KENSKI, V. M. [Education *nd *echn*l**ies: new *hy**m o* information]. Educaçã*
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t*cnologias: o *ovo ritmo da informaçã*. 4* *d. Campinas, S*: Pap*r*s, 2007.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
LÉVY, P. [Inte*lige*ce Tech*ologies: *he future of *houghts during *o*p**er e*a]. *s
</line>
<line>
Tec*ologias da *nte*igên*ia: O Fu*uro do P*n*ament* n* Er* da In*ormática. São Paulo:
</line>
<line>
Edi*ora 34, 1993.
</line>
<line>
Rev. *SA, Teresi*a, v. 13, n. *, art. 6, *. 96-115, set./o*t. 2016 ww*4.f***et.com.br/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
</document><par>
<line>
*cts *p*imization *n* *nformational *low *ncreasing: Impac*s on High School Daily Life
</line>
<line>
115
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
_____. [What *s virtual?]. * **e é * virtual? Tr*dução *e Paulo Neves. Sã* *aulo: Edit*ra
</line>
<line>
34.
</line>
<line>
_____. [The *ol*ective i*tell*ge*c*: for a c**erspace *ntrop*l*gy]. A inte*igê*cia coletiva:
</line>
<line>
*or *ma antropolo*i* d* ciberespaço. 4ª ed. São Paulo. Loy*la, 2*11.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
M*R*UES, M. O. [Knowledge a*d Modernism *n (re)cons*ruction]. Conhe*i*e*to
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ode*n*d*de em reconstrução. Iju*, ed. UNI**Í, *9*3.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
PIRE*, *. *; VEIT, E. A. [*nformation and **mmunicati** Te**n*logies to enlarg* and moti**te
</line>
<line>
Physics **arning in Hig* School]. T*cnologias de Informação e C*m*nicação pa*a ampliar e m*tivar *
</line>
<line>
aprend*z*do de F*sica n* Ensin* Médio. Rev. Bras. E*sino Fí*., São Paul*, v. *8, *. 2, jun. 2006.
</line>
<line>
**E*SKY, *. D*g**al N**ives, Digital Immi**ant* Part 1, *n the Horizo*, Vo*. 9 Is*: 5,
</line>
<line>
p.*-*, 2001.
</line>
<line>
SACRISTÁN, J. G. [*hangeable f*rces i* Education]. Poderes instáveis em *ducaç**.
</line>
<line>
Porto *leg*e: Artmed, 199*.
</line>
<line>
ST*EET, B. Literacy and Multimod*lity: STIS Lecture: Inte*-Disc*pli*aryS*min*rs. O
</line>
<line>
Labor*tório SEMI*TEC, da FALE/UFM* Fa*uldade de Letras, Belo Horizo*te, Bra*il,
</line>
<line>
*arch 9, p.2-3, 2012.
</line>
<line>
VILLA*A, N. [Pressed or Electronic? * Rea*ing Rout*]. Impresso ou E**trônico? Um
</line>
<line>
Trajeto de L**tura. Rio *e Jane*ro: Mauad, *00*.
</line>
<line>
ZILBERMA*, *. [End of book, end of *eade**?]. Fim do livro, fim dos l*itores? 2ª ed. São
</line>
<line>
Pau*o: Editora Se*** São Paulo, 2008.
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, T*resina PI, v. 13, n. 5, art. 6, p. 96-115, set/out. 2016
</line>
<line>
*ww4.fsan*t.com.*r/revista
</line>
</par>Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 1806-6356 (Print) and 2317-2983 (Electronic)