Ensaio sobre um Governo Orientado a Dados na Perspectiva da Tecnologia na Prática / Essay on a Data-Driven Government from the Perspective of Technology in Practice
Abstract
Este ensaio tem como objetivo propor uma discussão entre o argumento proposto por Orlikowski (2000) sobre a implementação da tecnologia na prática e sua relação com as possibilidades de reorganização estrutural do setor público, especialmente para a tomada de decisão orientada a dados. O desafio da compreensão e integração de um sistema sociomaterial numa realidade profundamente complexa, como a do setor público, exigirá um esforço para articular os diversos atores com interesses conflitantes. A reestruturação do governo, com uma orientação a dados, e uma nova organização do setor público, pode ser facilitada pela utilização da perspectiva da “tecnologia na prática”. No entanto, no caminho existem diversos pontos essenciais que precisam ser geridos com cautela para que as iniciativas sejam implementadas e bem-sucedidas.
Palavras-chave: Governo Orientado a Dados. Tecnologia na Prática. Sociomaterialidade.
ABSTRACT
This essay aims to propose a discussion between the argument proposed by Orlikowski (2000) about the implementation of technology in practice and its relationship with the possibilities of structural reorganization of the public sector, especially for data-oriented decision making. The challenge of understanding and integrating a socio-material system in a profoundly complex reality, such as that of the public sector, will require an effort from the public sector to articulate the various actors with intrinsically conflicting interests. Government restructuring, with a data orientation, and a new organization of the public sector, can be facilitated by using the “technology in practice” perspective. However, there are several essential points along the way that need to be managed with care for the initiatives to be implemented and successful.
Keywords: Data-Driven Government. Technology in Practice. Sociomateriality.
References
ABRUCIO, F. L. A coordenação federativa no Brasil: a experiência do período FHC e os desafios do governo Lula. Revista de Sociologia Política, n. 24, p. 41-67, 2005.
ABRUCIO, F. L.; FRANZESE, C. Federalismo e políticas públicas: o impacto das relações intergovernamentais no Brasil. In: ARAÚJO, M.; BEIRA, L. (Orgs.). Tópicos da Economia Paulista para Gestores Públicos. São Paulo: Fundap, p. 13-31, 2007.
AFFONSO, R. B. A. Descentralização e reforma do Estado: a federação brasileira na encruzilhada. Revista Economia e Sociedade, n. 14, p. 127-152, 2000.
AFONSO, A.; et al. Quality of public finances and growth. European Central Bank, Working Paper, n. 438, 2005.
ALVARENGA, A. et al. Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 14, 2020.
ARRETCHE, M. T. S. Mitos da descentralização: mais democracia e eficiência nas políticas públicas? Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 31, p. 44-66, 1996.
BOEING, G. Spatial information and the legibility of urban form: big data in urban morphology. International Journal of Information Management, v. 56, 2019.
CONTRACTOR, N. S.; MONGE, P. R.; LEONARDI, P.M. Multidimensional Networks and the Dynamics of Sociomateriality: Bringing Technology Inside the Network. International Journal of Communication, v. 5, p. 682-720, 2011.
DAVIS, P. Is evidence government possible? 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington, DC, USA, 19 Feb 2004.
DIMAGGIO, P., et alSocial Implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 27, n. 1, p. 307-336, 2001.
FERRANDINO, J. The enemy of teaching evidence-based policy: The Powell-Bush doctrine of public affairs. Journal Public Aff. Educ., n. 20, p. 73–89, 2014.
GAO, Z.; WANG, S.; GU, J. Public participation in smart-city governance: a qualitative content analysis of public comments in urban China. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 20, 2020.
JENNINGS, E.T. JR.; HALL, J. L. Evidence-based practice and the use of information in state agency decision making. J. Public Adm. Policy Res., 22, p. 245–266, 2011.
JOST, J. T.; FEDERICO, C. M.; NAPIER, J. L. Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu. Review Psychology, n. 60, p. 307-337, 2009.
KASSEN, M; Understanding motivations of citizens to reuse open data: open government data as a philanthropic movement. Innovation: Organization and Management, v. 23, n. 1, p. 44–70, 2021.
KELLER, S.; LANCASTER, V.; SHIPP, S. Building capacity for data-driven governance: creating a new foundation for democracy. Statistics and public policy, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2017.
KIM, E. S. S.; CHOI, Y.; BYUN, J. Big data analytics in government: Improving decision making for R&D investment in Korean SMEs. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 12, n. 1, 2020.
LEE, J. W. Big data strategies for government, society and policy-making. Journal of Asian finance, economics and business, v. 7, n.7, p. 475-487, 2020.
LEONARDI, P. M. Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In: LEONARDI P. M.; NARDI. B. A; KALLINIKOS, J. (eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world p. 25–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
MATHEUS, R.; JANSSEN, M.; MAHESHWARI, D. Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, v. 37, n. 3, p. 101284, 2020.
MEES, H. Local governments in the driving seat? A comparative analysis of public and private responsibilities for adaptation to climate change in European and North-American cities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, v. 19, n. 4, p. 374–390, 2017.
MICHENER, G.; RITTER, O. Comparing resistance to open data performance measurement: public education in Brazil and the UK. Public administration, v. 95, n. 1, p. 4-21, 2016.
OECD. Recommendation of the council for enhanced access and more effective use of public sector information; OECD: Paris, France, 2008; Disponível em: Acesso em julho 2021.
ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization science, v. 11, n. 4, p. 404-428, 2000.
ORLIKOWSKI, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1435-1448, 2007.
ØSTERBERG, D.; VALE, M. Historical Materialism and Durkheim's Collective Logic. International Journal of Sociology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 75-89, 1979.
PARMIGGIANI, E.; MIKALSEN, M. The Facets of Sociomateriality: A systematic mapping of emerging concepts and definitions. In: AANESTAD, M.; BRATTETEIG, T. (eds). Nordic Contributions in IS Research, Lecture Notes in Business Information Procesing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 87–103, 2013
RICKER, B.; CINNAMON, J.; DIERWECHTER, Y. When open data and data activism meet: An analysis of civic participation in Cape Town, South Africa. The Canadian Geographer, v. 64, n. 3, p. 359–373, 2020.
RIZK, A.; STÅHLBRÖST, A.; ELRAGAL, A. Data-driven innovation processes within federated networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020.
SANGER, M. B. From measurement to management: breaking through the barriers to state and local performance, 2008.
SOOMRO, K. et al. Smart city big data analytics: An advanced review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, v. 9, n. 5, 2019.
SUSHA, I. Establishing and implementing data collaborations for public good: a critical factor analysis to scale up the practice. Information polity – International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2019.
TRIANTAFILLOU, P. The political implications of performance management and evidence-based policymaking. Rev. Public Adm. n. 45, p.167–181, 2015.
WEERAKKODY, V et al. Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the citizen’s perspective. Information systems frontiers, v. 19, n. 2, p. 285-300, 2016.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12819/2022.19.8.4
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1806-6356 (Print) and 2317-2983 (Electronic)