Performance in Public Management: Comparing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Effectiveness Between Brazilian Federal Universities / Desempenho na Gestão Pública: Comparação de Eficiência, Eficácia e Eficácia Entre Universidades Federais Brasileiras
Resumen
The aim of this present work is to compare the performance in public management among Brazilian federal universities, from indicators, which deal with the levels of efficiency, efficacy and effectiveness extracted directly from the performance management reports of the Federal Court of Auditors. Conducting the research, secondary data comprising a universe of 63 federal universities were used within a time frame between the years 2015 to 2019. Through the application of multivariate statistical techniques of data, such as multiple linear regression and analysis of clusters (conglomerates), it was possible to compare the performance between each Brazilian federal university with the public management indicators adopted by the TCU. The comparative analysis allowed the development of groupings between the federal universities according to the results of each management indicator, in such a way that it made it possible to know the performance of each group by levels of efficiency, effectiveness and effectiveness.
Keywords: Performance. Brazilian Federal Universities. Efficiency. Efficacy. Effectiveness.
RESUMO
O objetivo do presente trabalho é comparar o desempenho na gestão pública entre as universidades federais brasileiras, a partir de indicadores, que tratam dos níveis de eficiência, eficácia e efetividade extraídos diretamente dos relatórios de gestão de desempenho do Tribunal de Contas da União. Para a realização da pesquisa, foram utilizados dados secundários compreendendo um universo de 63 universidades federais em um recorte temporal entre os anos de 2015 a 2019. Por meio da aplicação de técnicas estatísticas multivariadas de dados, como regressão linear múltipla e análise de clusters (conglomerados), foi possível comparar o desempenho de cada universidade federal brasileira com os indicadores de gestão pública adotados pelo TCU. A análise comparativa permitiu o desenvolvimento de agrupamentos entre as universidades federais de acordo com os resultados de cada indicador de gestão, de forma que possibilitou conhecer o desempenho de cada agrupamento por níveis de eficiência, eficácia e eficácia.
Palavras-chave: Desempenho. Universidades Federais Brasileiras. Eficiência. Eficácia. Eficácia.
Referencias
Azma, F. (2010). Qualitative Indicators for the evaluation of universities performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5408-5411.
Arveson P. Translating Performance Metrics from the Private to the Public Sector. (1999). http://www.balancedscorecard.org/TranslatingMetrics/tabid/139/Default.aspx
Barbosa, M.P.; Petterini, F.C.; & Ferreira, R.T. (2020). Federal universities expansion policy: it is possible to maximize the impacts. Journal of Contemporary Management, 24(1), 1–24.
Bertolin, J.C.G. (2007). Quality Assessment of the Brazilian Higher Education System in Times of Commercialization – Period 1994-2003. (Doctoral Thesis) Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande, RS.
Biggeri, L., & Bini, M. (2001). Evaluation at university and state level in Italy: need for a system of evaluation and indicators. Tertiary education and management, 7(2), 149-162.
BRAZIL. Reference Guide for Performance Measurement and Manual for Building Indicators of the Management Secretariat of the Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management – GRMDMCI/MPOG. 1st ed. Brasilia, 2009.
Castro, M.H.G. (1997, December) Inaugural Lecture. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Educational Assessment. Rio de Janeiro - RJ.
Catani, A. M. & Oliveira, J. F. Higher education. (2007). In Oliveira, R. P., Adrião, T. (Org.). Educational organization in Brazil: levels and modalities in the Federal Constitution and in the LDB (2nd Ed., 73–84) São Paulo, SP: Xamã.
Corrar, L., J, Paulo, E., Dias Filho, J M. (2007). Multivariate analysis. Sao Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Cunha, L.A. (2007). The meandering development of Brazilian education between the State and the market. Education & Society, 28(100), 809-829.
Duan, S. X. Measuring university efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis and strategic group analysis to Australian universities. (2019). Benchmarking: an International Journal, 26(4), 1161–1173.
Dundar, H.D., & Lewis, D.R. (1999). Equity, quality and efficiency effects of reform in Turkish higher education. Higher Education Policy, 12(4), 343-366.
Galvão, H.M., Corrêa, H.L., & Alves, J.L. (2011). Global performance assessment model for higher education institutions. Journal of Administration of the Federal University of Santa Maria, 4(3), 425-441.
Lugoboni, L.F. (2011). Organizational Performance Assessment Models in Higher Education Institutions in Greater São Paulo (Master's Dissertation). University of São Caetano do Sul, 2011.
Melo, A.I., Sarrico, C.S. & Radnor, Z. (2010). The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Management Review, 12(2), 233-254.
Muriel, R. (2006). Institutional Development Plan-PDI: analysis of the implementation process. Vitória, ES: Hoper.
Navarre. (2004). Navarra Education Indicator System 2003. Navarra/Spain: Gobierno de Navarra.
Oliveira, A.P. (2007). The public-private relationship in the context of higher education. (Doctoral thesis). Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE.
Polidori, M.M. (2009). Brazilian higher education evaluation policies: Provão, SINAES, IDD, CPC, IGC and... other indices. Evaluation: Journal of Higher Education Evaluation (Campinas), 14(2), 439-452.
Rabovsky, T. M. Using data to manage for performance at public universities. (2014). Public Administration Review, 74(1), 260–272.
Reis, C.Z.T. (2011). Stages of institutionalization of the budget allocation model of Brazilian federal universities (Master's Dissertation) – Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG.
Richardson, R. (1999). Social research: methods and techniques. Sao Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Santos, A.R., Barbosa, F.L., Martins, D.F.V., & Moura, H.J.de. (2017). Budget, indicators and performance management of Brazilian federal universities. Journal of Public Administration and Social Management, 9(4), 276-285.
Santos, A.R., Martins, D.F.V., Barbosa, F.L., Moura, H.J.de., & Moura, E.A. (2018). A longitudinal study on the relationship between strategic planning and performance in federal universities in northeastern Brazil. Qualit@s Magazine, 19(1), 158-182.
Santos, S. M. dos., & Noronha, D. P. (2016). The performance of Brazilian universities in international rankings. In Question, 22(2), 186-219.
Sguissardi, V.; & Silva Junior, J. (2001). New faces of higher education in Brazil – State reform and changes in production. São Paulo, SP: Cortez/Edusf.
Steiner, J.E. (2005). Institutional quality and diversity in Brazilian graduate studies. Advanced Studies, 19(54), 341-365.
Usoh, E.; Preston, G. Strategic planning and performance measurement for public universities in Sulawesi, Indonesia: quantitative approach. (2017). PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 174–197.
Vieira, E.F., & Vieira, M.M.F. (2004). Bureaucratic functionality in federal universities: conflict in times of change. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 8(2), 181-200.
Waheed, B., Khan, F.I., & Veitch, B. (2011). Developing a quantitative tool for sustainability assessment of HEIs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 355-368.
World Bank. (1994) Higher education: The lessons of experience. New York: Oxford University Press
Yonezawa, A. (2008). Quality assessment and assurance in japanese universities: the plight of the social sciences. Social Science Japan Journal, 11(1), 69-82.
Zandavalli, C.B. (2009). Evaluation of higher education in Brazil: the historical background of SINAES. Evaluation: Journal of Higher Education Evaluation, 14(2), 385-438.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12819/2023.20.8.3
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Atribuição (BY): Os licenciados têm o direito de copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, conquanto que deem créditos devidos ao autor ou licenciador, na maneira especificada por estes.
Não Comercial (NC): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, desde que sejam para fins não-comerciais
Sem Derivações (ND): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar apenas cópias exatas da obra, não podendo criar derivações da mesma.
ISSN 1806-6356 (Impresso) e 2317-2983 (Eletrônico)