<document>
<page>
<par>
<line>
Centro Unv*rsitário Santo Agostinho
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
www*.fsanet.com.*r/revista
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Tere*i*a, *. *8, n. 04, art. 3, p. 47-67, ab*. 2*21
</line>
<line>
*SSN Impresso: 18*6-6356 ISS* Eletr*nico: 2317-2983
</line>
<line>
http://dx.doi.org/10.12819/2021.*8.04.3
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ea*nings Quality and Investment Ef*i*iency: An A*al*sis of **ectricity Com**nies Listed *n B3
</line>
<line>
Qualida*e dos *u*ros e Efic*ência do Inve**imen*o: Uma Anál*se d*s Empr*s*s de Ele*ricidade
</line>
<line>
Listadas e* B3
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*dgar Maria Ferr***a da Costa
</line>
<line>
*raduação em Ciê*cias Cont*beis pela Un*versidade Feder*l d* Grande Dourado*
</line>
<line>
edgar96c*st*@hotmail.**m
</line>
<line>
Thayn*ra *ietro Ferna*d**
</line>
<line>
Graduaç*o em Ciências Con*á*eis pela U*iversidade *ederal da Grande D*ura*os
</line>
<line>
thaynara.p*etr*85@*mail.*om
</line>
<line>
Josima* Pi*e* da Silva
</line>
<line>
D*uto* em Ciências Co*tábeis pela Universidade de Br*sília
</line>
<line>
josimarc*b@*m*i*.co*
</line>
<line>
Rafa*l Ma**ins Noriller
</line>
<line>
Dou*o* em Ci*ncias Cont*beis pel* *n*versidade de Brasília
</line>
<line>
r*fael.m*o*iller@gma**.c*m
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
En*ereço: Ed*ar Maria Fe**eira da C*sta
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Uni*ersidade *eder*l da Grand* Dourado*. R. João *osa
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Góes, 1**1 - Vila Pro*resso, Dourado* - MS, 7*8*5-070.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Brasil.
</line>
<line>
Editor-C*e*e: Dr. Ton*y Kerle* *e Alen*ar
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Endereço: Thaynara *ietro **rnandes
</line>
<line>
Rodrigues
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Unive*sidade F*deral da Grande Dourados. *. João R*s*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Góes, 1761 - *ila Progr*sso, *o*rad*s - MS, 79825-070.
</line>
<line>
*rtigo recebido em 22/0*/2021. Últi*a
</line>
<line>
ve*s*o
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Bras*l.
</line>
<line>
recebida em 08/03/20*1. Aprovado *m 0*/*3/2021.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
E*dereç*: Josim*r *ires *a Silva
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
</page><page>
<par>
<line>
*. M. *. Costa, T. P. Fer*andes, J. P. Silva, R. *. N**i*l**
</line>
<line>
48
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ABSTRACT
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*e present
</line>
<line>
study an*ly*es th* relatio*ship betw*en earn*ngs
</line>
<line>
quality
</line>
<line>
and investment
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
electric sector is due to t*e large n*m*er of companies, the v*lume of *e*ources invested in
</line>
<line>
the se*tor, *nd strong r*gu*ation as a r*ducing fac*or of in*o*ma**ona* a*y**etry. Th* dat*
</line>
<line>
a**lyz*d co*e*s the *erio* from 2010 t* 2**7 throu*h a sta*ic pane*, *n* comprises * sample
</line>
<line>
of 57 companies in *he electricity sector. We used info*mation contained in the fin*ncial
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
statements extracted from *he [B]3
</line>
<line>
d*tabase
</line>
<line>
on its website *or disclo*ure *urpos*s. *ighe*-
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
quality financial rep**tin* should inc*ease investm*nt efficiency. Moreover, reducing adve**e
</line>
<line>
selection and mo*al hazard increases *he qua*ity of financial r*porting information and allo*s
</line>
<line>
manag*rs t* identify better inves*ment op*ortunitie*. With this i* mind, *he hy*othes*s of this
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
research is th*t there is a signifi*an*
</line>
<line>
and positive *elationship betwee* earnings qu*lity and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
inves*ment efficien*y of electricity co**anies listed *n [B]3. Results i*dicated a positive
</line>
<line>
re*a*ionsh*p *etween earnings qual*ty and inv*stment efficienc*, esp*c**lly mitigating
</line>
<line>
*verin*estment. T*ese res*lts corroborate studi*s c*n*uct*d in devel*ped economies.
</line>
<line>
No*wi*hsta*ding, higher *nf*rmat*on quali*y d*es not mitigate **derinve**ment.
</line>
<line>
Keywords: *n*estment Ef*ici*nc*. *nformation Qual*t*. Electricity Sector.
</line>
<line>
RESU*O
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
O presente *studo analis* a relaçã* entre a qua*id*de d*s ganh*s e a
</line>
<line>
eficiênc*a
</line>
<line>
do
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
in*estimento das empr*sas d* el*tri*idade lista*as no Br*sil, B*l*a, Balcão [B] 3. A *s*ol*a
</line>
<line>
*o set*r elétric* se deve ao *rande n*mero de em*resas, ao volume de recu*sos invest*dos no
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
se*or à forte regulamenta**o como fator *edutor d* assimetria informacional. Os dados *
</line>
<line>
analisado* cobre* * pe*íodo de 2010 a 2*17 por m*** de um p*inel est*tico, e abrangem um*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
amos*r* de 57 em*r*sa* do s*tor e*é*rico. Utilizamos as informações *ontidas
</line>
<line>
nas
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
de**nstrações finan*eiras extra*das *o banc*
</line>
<line>
*e
</line>
<line>
*ados
</line>
<line>
[B] 3 de s*u website *ara fins
</line>
<line>
de
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
divu*ga*ão. Relatórios financeiro* de a*ta qual*dade devem a*mentar
</line>
<line>
a ef**iência *o
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
invest*mento. *lém disso, a redução da seleção a*versa * *o risco mora* aumen*a * **a*i*ade
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
d*s *nform*ções
</line>
<line>
dos rel*tór*os **nanceiros * permite que os gestores identi*iq*em *elhores
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
oportunidades de in*estimento. D*ante
</line>
<line>
disso, a hipótese *e*ta *esq*isa é que ex*st* uma
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*e**ção significa*i*a e positiva entre a q*alidade dos ganhos e * ef*c*ência d* inv*stimento **s
</line>
<line>
e*p*esas de ene*g*a elétrica listad*s em [*] *. ** *esulta*os indicaram uma relaç*o positiva
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
entre a qualidade dos
</line>
<line>
lucro* * a eficiênc** d*
</line>
<line>
invest*mento, es*ec*alm*n** mitig*n*o
</line>
<line>
o
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
sobr**nvestimen*o. Esses resultados co*roboram es**do* r*ali*ados em economias
</line>
<line>
*esenvolv*das. N* entanto, a ma**r qualidade *a informaçã* não atenua * sub*nv*s*im*nto.
</line>
<line>
Palavras-ch**e: *ficiência de I*v**timent*. Qual*dad* da Info*maçã*. *e*or Elétric*.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
*ev. FSA, **resina, v. 18, n. 04, art. 3, p. *7-67, abr. *02*
</line>
<line>
www4.fsan*t.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
*arnings Qu*lity and Inv*s*me*t Ef*iciency: *n Ana*ysis of Elect**c**y Compa*ies Listed in B3
</line>
<line>
49
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
* INTRO*UCT*ON
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Capital *nvest*e*t d**isio*s are a key factor in de*erm*ning the value *f *he c*mpan*
</line>
<line>
*nd, therefo*e, inve**or we**th. The ma*n *et*r*inants for a company *o make efficient
</line>
<line>
**v*stme*t d*cis*on* include spe*ia*iz*d and d*dic***d manage*ent teams a*d su*ficient
</line>
<line>
capital resources. Previous literatu*e sho*s that high-quality financia* reporting and corpor*te
</line>
<line>
governance mechan*sms can h*lp prevent or miti*at* *ubopti*a* inves*ments b* discipl*ni*g
</line>
<line>
*a*ager *ehavior *nd r*d*cing *he cost of capita* (CHEN, XIE; ZHANG, *017).
</line>
<line>
P**viou* *e*ear** highli*h*s that h*gher-quality fin*nc*al r*po*ting *ho*ld increase
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
investment
</line>
<line>
efficie*cy (B**H*AN; SMITH, 2001; HE*L*; PALEPU, 20**; LAMBERT;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
LEUZ; VER*ECCHIA, 2007), *nd companies ca* *educe i*fo*m*tion *symmet*ie*
</line>
<line>
b*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
increa*ing the quality of *hese re**rts (BUS**AN;
</line>
<line>
SM*TH, 2001; HEA*Y; *ALEPU,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
20*1). Surveys (B*DDLE; HILA*Y, 2*06; BIDDLE; *ILARY; VE*DI, 20*9; *H*N et al.,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
20*1;
</line>
<line>
MCNICHOL*; STUB*EN, 2008) suggest that reducing *dverse sele*ti*n an* mor*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hazard i*creas*s the *uality of financial reporting inf*r*ation and all*ws managers to
</line>
<line>
id*ntify **tter *nvestment oppo*tun*ties.
</line>
<line>
C**sistent with the a*gum*nt that **e reduction *f adverse s*lection and mo*a* hazard
</line>
<line>
incr*ase* t** quality *f information, Bid*le et al. (200*) and B*dd*e an* Hilary (2006) f*und
</line>
<line>
**at f*rms with higher-*uality *inan*ial re*o**ing invest more efficiently, which is repre*ented
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
by l*wer inve*tmen*-cash flow
</line>
<line>
*e*sit*vity. Howe*er, this *en*itiv**y ma* reflect fun*ing
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
c*ns**aints *r *xcess cas* (FA*ZARI; HUBBARD; PETERSEN,
</line>
<line>
2000; KAPLAN;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ZINGALES, 2**0). *hese resu*t* rais* the additional que*tion of wheth*r low*r *ual**y *f
</line>
<line>
information r**at*s to overi**e*tm*n*, underin*est*e*t, or *oth.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
I* practic*, compa*ies may face some fund*ng
</line>
<line>
constraint* that lim*t the ability *f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
manager* to carry *ut
</line>
<line>
all p**jects with posi*ive *PV (e.g., Hubba*d, 1998). In theory,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
h*wever, compa*ies ar* *ikely to obtain funding for all projects with positive **V and *ill
</line>
<line>
*ont*nue to invest until the margi*al ben*fit of the investment equals the mar*ina* co*t (e.g.,
</line>
<line>
*aya*hi, 1982). I* is noteworthy in **is co***xt that *nvestment op**rt*nities are t*e single
</line>
<line>
dri*er of the invest*ent policy of a f*rm (MODIGLI*NI; MI*LER, 1958).
</line>
<line>
Previ*us litera*ure *as shown tha* friction i* the capital mar*et can di*tor* the optimal
</line>
<line>
investm*nt of fi*ms (**EN; *ILL; VAN*E, 2*14), which lead* to o*erinvestment or
</line>
<line>
un**rinvestment. Overin*es*ment occurs when manage*s inve*t ineffe*ti*ely, selecting *oo*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
projects to expropriate the exi*ting r*sou*c*s of c**panie*. O*
</line>
<line>
th* other hand,
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
u**erinvestment occurs *he* companies facing fun*i*g constraints move aw** f*o* projects
</line>
<line>
**v. FSA, T*resina PI, v. 18, n. *4, a*t. 3, p. 47-67, *br. 2021 www*.fsan*t.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. M. F. Costa, T. P. Fernandes, J. P. Silva, R. M. Noril*er
</line>
<line>
*0
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
wit* posit*v* NPV due t* th* high cost of raisi*g capit** (e.g., BIDDLE et al., 20*9). *oth
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
si*uations coul* relate to
</line>
<line>
p*or qua*ity of in*ormation, since th*s is *n *mp*rtant featu*e *f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
financ*al reporting that aff*cts the efficient alloc*ti*n
</line>
<line>
of *es*urces (DEME*JIAN; LEV;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
L*WIS; M*VAY, 2013).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
It is notewor*hy t*at studies show the *os*tive rela*io*ship between financial re*ortin*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
quality and investment efficienc*, above
</line>
<line>
all, in de*e*op*d countries, such *s t*e USA (e.g.,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
BI*DL* et al.,
</line>
<line>
2009),
</line>
<line>
a nd
</line>
<line>
l*rgel* *n
</line>
<line>
**e European Union, with littl* evidence in eme*ging
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
countries (CHEN et al., 2011). F*nd*ngs
</line>
<line>
are l*kely to
</line>
<line>
differ when
</line>
<line>
considering *he Braz*lia*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
scenar**, whi*h has sig*i*icant
</line>
<line>
v*ri*tio* in the size* of comp*n*es *ist*d in B3, i.e.,
</line>
<line>
Blue
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Chi*s and companies *ess consolidated in the ma*k*t an* with hi*her *isk, s*all-caps
</line>
<line>
*nd
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
mid-ca*s. *hen taking greater risks, manage*s m*y *arr* out projects th*t do not alway* ad*
</line>
<line>
v*lu* to s*are**ld*rs.
</line>
<line>
For the *raz*lian context, previ*us literature shows low** Financia* Reporting Qua*ity
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(***) in priva*e c*mpanies, presumabl* due to t*e
</line>
<line>
lower mar*et d*man* fo* public
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*nfor*ation. The quality *f
</line>
<line>
this reporting is l*wer in c*untri*s with low investor pr*tection,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
bank-oriented finan*ial syste*s, and greater conf*rmity betwee* tax *nd f*nan*ial
</line>
<line>
report**g
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
rules (CHEN et *l., 2011). In emerging marke*s, private c**pan*es finan*e investme*ts *rom
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
out*ide sou*ces -
</line>
<line>
including bank l*ans, private
</line>
<line>
equ*ty iss*e*, *ea*ing, *omme**ial credit,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
finan*ing **om special development agencies or g*vernments, and
</line>
<line>
info*mal financi*g -
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
from r*tained earni*g* and addit*onal **ntrib*t*ons fr*m owners (BECK; DEMIRGUC-
</line>
<line>
K*N*; M****MOVI*, 2008).
</line>
<line>
A large body of *iterat*re *ocuments how the av*ilab*l*ty of external or interna* fu*ds
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
affec*s
</line>
<line>
i**est*ent
</line>
<line>
decisions (BLANCHAR*; LOPE*-D*-SILANES; SHLEIFER,
</line>
<line>
199*;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
MYERS; *AJLU*, 1984). These s*u*ie* *sed s*mpl*s of
</line>
<line>
publicly traded companies that
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
de*end m*inly on capit*l and d*bt financing. F** pr*vate companie*, external fundi*g sources
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
are generally lim*ted
</line>
<line>
a** consist mainly
</line>
<line>
of bank loans *n* com*ercia* credit. On the other
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hand, *he presen*e of regulation in s**e sectors, s*ch as electricity, can mitigate risks,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*specially
</line>
<line>
overinvestmen* and underinvestment. Th*s, empirical evidence i* devel*ping
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
countri*s *t*** rep*ese*ts a gap t*
</line>
<line>
be filled, especially in sectors with large amoun*s o*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
investments, as is the c*se *n the electricity sector.
</line>
<line>
Acc**ding to *** *a*ional *l*ctr*c Energy Agen** (ANEEL, 201*), the ele*tricit*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
su*sector in Braz*l has widely dispersed p*wer ge*er*tion network, wit* 2,661 gen*r*ting a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*rojects and an i*stalled capacity of 118,886,137 kW. The*e fac*ors s*ow the *ize
</line>
<line>
*nd
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
importan*e of this *ub*ector for the countr*. Despite dispersion, comp*nie* *perate most*y in
</line>
<line>
*ev. FS*, Te*e*i*a, v. 1*, n. *4, art. 3, p. 47-67, a*r. 2021 www4.fs**et.com.*r/re**sta
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Earning* Quality a*d Investment Ef*icienc*: An Ana*ysis of Electricity Compan*e* *isted in B*
</line>
<line>
51
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the *orm of na*ural *o*opolies. The importance of th*s s***ector, given its prom*nent role in
</line>
<line>
the coun*r*\s econom* by prod*cing a *r**ar* input in *he prod*ction chain, r*late* ** the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
reg*lation of its
</line>
<line>
accou*ting pra*tices. Regulati*n inte*d* *o avoid surprise* in the *i*ancial
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
health o* compan*es in the s*ctor, and, conseque*tly, prevent the interrupti*n in the supply of
</line>
<line>
t hi s i nput .
</line>
<line>
*he National Ass*ciatio* of Ener*y Co*sumers (ANACE, 2*18) co*s*ders tha* the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
electricity subs*c*or
</line>
<line>
in Br*zil i* la*gely institutio*alized through sev*ral bo*ies,
</line>
<line>
name*y:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
N*tional Energy Policy C*uncil (CN*E), Min*s*ry of Min*s and E*erg* (MME), Electricity
</line>
<line>
Secto* M*ni*oring Com*itte* (CMSE), E*ergy Research Company (EP*), AN*EL, National
</line>
<line>
*y*tem O*erator (*NS), *lec*ric Energy Trading *hamber (CCEE), and El*trobras (which
</line>
<line>
*cts as a holding o* state-owned co*p*nies). The creati*n of Law No. 12,*83/2*13 is also
</line>
<line>
w*rthy ** attention. This law provi*es that ene*gy gen**atio* and transmiss*on companies
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
w*uld
</line>
<line>
renew their concession
</line>
<line>
contr*cts in advance, w*ich allows ANEEL to regulate the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
prices charg**. Thi* *ontext corroborates t*e c**cept*on that regulation in the referred sector
</line>
<line>
is active and ongoing (Silv*, Bo*g*s, Go*çalves & Nascim*n*o, 2017).
</line>
<line>
Bas*d on *he previously highlighted conte*t and on the reasons listed, the *esear*h
</line>
<line>
*r*blem resum*s i* the following ques*ion: what is t** relatio*s*ip between *arni**s
</line>
<line>
quality and invest*e*t efficiency of publicly *rad*d Brazilian companies in t*e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ele*tricit* subsec*or? To answer the research
</line>
<line>
problem, this investigation analyzes
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
re*ationship between
</line>
<line>
*hese va*ia*les in *l**tr*cit* companies
</line>
<line>
listed in Brazil, Bolsa, *alcã*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
[B]3.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The firs* mot*va*i*n of this study is the absence *f em*i*ic*l stu**es *n the efficie*cy
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
of **vestme*ts in eme*gi*g econ*mies, particularly in t*e **azilian context, *n
</line>
<line>
wh*ch
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
compani*s vary largely in size. Res*ar*h o* investment efficienc* mostly ad*ress devel*ped
</line>
<line>
countries. Few studies have *ocus*d on em*rgi*g markets, whi** have a we*ker *ontrol and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
mon*toring system. T*is weaker con*rol all*ws great** expropri*tion by
</line>
<line>
the manager,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
e*peci*ll* r*gard*ng *inority sharehol*ers. Und**stan*ing thi* *elationship is *ve* mor*
</line>
<line>
es*enti*l fr*m th* point of v*ew o* investors, who *ave *inancial repo*ts *s their main sou*ce
</line>
<line>
of info*mation and us* a*counting numb*rs in resource allo*ation *ecisions.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Moreo*er, the studies analy**d did no* addr**s the
</line>
<line>
relat*onsh*p be*ween
</line>
<line>
e*rnings
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
qua*ity *nd i*vestment efficienc* i* spe*ifi* *ecto*s, e*pec*ally in reg*lat*d envi**nment*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
This resear*h
</line>
<line>
anal*zes m*n**er behavior in te*** of in*estment e**iciency an*
</line>
<line>
earnings
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
quality i* the Br*zi*i*n elect*i**ty sector. *onsideri*g the impor*ance of this sector, especial*y
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
rega*ding the a**unt of *un*s raised in the mark*t, the *rese*t research hi*hl*ghts
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Te*esina PI, v. 18, n. 04, ar*. *, p. 47-67, abr. 2021 www4.*sanet.co*.br/rev*sta
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. M. F. Co*ta, T. P. Fernandes, *. P. Silva, R. M. Noril**r
</line>
<line>
52
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
relations*ip be*w**n th*s* f**tor*, and *** be useful to inve*tors and other research**s.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2 LITERATURE R*VIEW AND HYPO*HESIS DEV*LOPMEN*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Dechow, Ge an* Schrand (2010) define earn*ngs quality b**ed on SFAC No. 1,
</line>
<line>
paragrap* 42, which states that fina*cia* *eports *ust provide informa*ion about the financial
</line>
<line>
*erformance of a *omp*ny over * given period. Th*s, "**gh-quality e*rnings provide more
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*formation about financial
</line>
<line>
performance charact*r*stics of a firm, w*ich are impor**n* fo*
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dec**ion maker to make a spe*if*c decision".
</line>
<line>
One of the purpo*es of *inancial re*orting *s *o facilitate efficient capit*l a*location.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
An i*po*t*nt aspect *f this role is
</line>
<line>
**provi** i*vestment dec*sions (CHEN et al., 2011).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Spec*f*cal*y, the t**ory suggests that improving fi*anc*al tra*spar*ncy al**v*ates
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
underinvestment
</line>
<line>
and overinvest*e*t problem*. Recen* s*udies su*p*rt this pr*diction
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(BID*LE; HILARY, *006; BIDDL*; HILARY; VERDI, 2009; CHE* et a*., ***1; HOPE;
</line>
<line>
TH*MAS, 2008; MCNI*HOL*; ST*BBEN, 2008).
</line>
<line>
A large part *f the r**evant literature associate* earnings quality (EQ) with **vestme*t
</line>
<line>
effic**n*y (*ENLEMLIH; BIT*R, 2018; BI*DLE; HI*A*Y, 2*0*; BIDDLE; H**ARY;
</line>
<line>
VERDI, 2009; B*SH*AN; SMITH, *001; CHEN et al., 2011; ELAOUD; JAR*OUI, *017;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
GO*A*IZ; *ALLESTA, 2013; HAB*B; *ASAN,
</line>
<line>
2017; H*ALY; PALEPU,
</line>
<line>
20**;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
LAMBER*; LEUZ; VER***CHIA, 2007; MAN*E* *t al., **16). I* this regard, stud*es
</line>
<line>
*ave shown th*t higher-quali*y financial reporting cou** increa*e *nve*tm*nt efficiency
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(BIDDLE; HILARY, *006; BUSHMAN; SMITH, 2001; HEALY; PAL*P*,
</line>
<line>
2001;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
LAMB*RT; LEUZ; VER*ECCHIA, 2007), le*ding to lowe* *nvestment-cash *low
</line>
<line>
sensitivity (*ID*LE; HI*ARY, 2006; BIDDLE; HILARY; VERDI, 2*0*).
</line>
<line>
These surveys highlight that higher e*rning* quality (EQ) mak*s **nagers more
</line>
<line>
re*po*sible, **l*wing bett*r monito*ing, reduci*g adver** sel*c*ion and moral *aza*d, a*d
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
hence reducing
</line>
<line>
in**rmation asymmetr*es, which
</line>
<line>
can miti*ate underinv*stment *nd
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*verinvestm*nt pr*blems (ELAOUD; JAR*OU*, 2017; GOMARIZ; BALLESTA, 2013). I*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
additi*n, EQ could
</line>
<line>
improve investment
</line>
<line>
efficiency, all*wi*g m*nagers to make better
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
decisions through be*ter identi*icatio* *f the most accurate projec*s a*d accounting p*o*its f*r
</line>
<line>
i*ternal de*ision m*kers (BUSHMAN; *M*TH, 2001; GO**RIZ; B*LLESTA, 201*;
</line>
<line>
MCNICHOLS; *T*BBEN, 2*08). M*reover, it could h*ghlight th* ability of m*nag*rs to use
</line>
<line>
the resources entrusted to them (*RAN*IS; HUANG; ZANG, 2008; HABIB; HASAN,
</line>
<line>
2017).
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Te*esina, v. 18, *. 0*, art. 3, p. 47-*7, *br. 2021 w*w4.fsanet.com.*r/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E**nings Qu*l*ty an* Investment E*ficiency: An A*alysis o* Electricity Companies Lis*ed in B3
</line>
<line>
53
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
From an e*fic*en* contracting
</line>
<line>
perspe*tive, mo*e a*le *an*gers would invest more
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
effic*e*tl* compare* to their less able peer*. Mor* abl* m*nagers
</line>
<line>
are mo*e e*ficient *n
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
evalu**ing the
</line>
<line>
t*m*ng and econo*ic returns on investm**t, as well
</line>
<line>
as i* synthesizing
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*nform*tio* in reliable estimates of t*e *isks a*d re*urns associat*d wi*h corporate i*vestm**t
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(DE*E***AN; LE*IS; M*V*Y, 201*; HABIB; HASAN,
</line>
<line>
2017). A* such, t*ey are more
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
likely to signal positively
</line>
<line>
abou* the
</line>
<line>
f*rm\* value
</line>
<line>
compared *o their *ess abl*
</line>
<line>
cou*te*parts
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
through forec*st dis*losures. In contrast, the prospect of inc*me
</line>
<line>
extraction shows that
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
mo*t abl* *anagers overvalue their perso*al improvement in their careers and, in doing so,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
take *ctions that ca* worse* the *irm\s **st*. For **ample, mo*e
</line>
<line>
able man*gers can
</line>
<line>
be
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
overconfident and thus overestimate
</line>
<line>
the retu*ns on corpora** inve*tment (HABIB; HA*AN,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2017). Empirical evidence revea*s that **cessive ma*ager*al con**denc* can distort corpor*te
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
investmen* decisions (HUANG et al., 2011)
</line>
<line>
and ***d to value-de**roying mergers
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(MALMENDIE*; T*TE, 200*). In this c*se, *igher EQ would mitigate *he effects of debt
</line>
<line>
extraction, esp*cially by *rovi**ng investors wi*h more relevant and reliable inf*rmation.
</line>
<line>
A l*rge body of literat*re shows that co*pa**es can improve *he quality of account*ng
</line>
<line>
inf*rmat*on. Acc*rding to neoclassical t*e*ry, companies invest u*til the marginal benefit is
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
eq*al *o
</line>
<line>
the margin*l cost o*
</line>
<line>
that investment so a* to **ximize va*ue*
</line>
<line>
(HAYASHI, 19*2;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
YOSH*KAWA, 1980). In the Keynesian *r*me*ork, th* pr*ference for *rowth or financia*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ecu*i*y is what
</line>
<line>
de*erm*nes investm*nt (CROTTY, 1992; GORDON, *992). *n the
</line>
<line>
agency
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
f*amewo*k, *hich considers infor*ati*n asymmetry problems, firms ma* devi*te *rom thei*
</line>
<line>
optimal inv*stment levels (*HE* et a*., 2011) and th*re*o*e suf*er from overinvestment or
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
un*er*nve*tmen*. I* agency
</line>
<line>
*heory, howev*r, several *ontrol m*c*anisms mit**ate
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
informati*n asymmetries and i*formation *isk. **ese mechanisms also allo* better
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
s**ervision
</line>
<line>
*f *an*gement *c*ivi*y, mitigating th*
</line>
<line>
opportunistic behavior of managers,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
e*pec*ally with regard to ear***gs m*nage*ent, thus improv*n* ea*nings quality (ELAOUD;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
JARBOUI,
</line>
<line>
2017; GOMARIZ; BA*L*STA, 2013; HEALY; PALEPU, 2001; H*PE;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
THOMAS,
</line>
<line>
20*8;
</line>
<line>
MAR*ÍNE*-FERRERO;
</line>
<line>
GARCIA-SANCHEZ;
</line>
<line>
C*ADRAD*-
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
BALL*STEROS, 2*15).
</line>
<line>
Hir*hleifer, Ho*, Teo* *nd Zh*ng (2004), *i*dl* e* al. (200*), and C*en et *l. (2011)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
examine the effe** of inf*r*ation qualit* on two in*fficient sc*narios,
</line>
<line>
ove*investment
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
underinve*tment.
</line>
<line>
T*ese
</line>
<line>
*uthors
</line>
<line>
r*porte*
</line>
<line>
th*t
</line>
<line>
higher
</line>
<line>
i*formation
</line>
<line>
qual*ty
</line>
<line>
helps
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
underinvest*ent c*mpanie* to make investm*nts, and overinvestment c*mpanie* *o dec*eas*
</line>
<line>
their investmen* *evel. In line with the evidence t*at ear*i*gs management leads to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
o**rinvestment *ecause it distorts the information
</line>
<line>
used
</line>
<line>
by *anagers (MC**CHOLS;
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, T*re**na PI, v. 18, n. 04, art. 3, *. 47-67, abr. 2021
</line>
<line>
w*w*.fs*ne*.*om.*r/rev*sta
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
*. M. F. C*sta, T. P. F*rnan**s, J. P. Silva, *. M. *or*ller
</line>
<line>
54
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
STUBBE*, 20*8),
</line>
<line>
hi*her-quality i*formation mitigates ove*investment
</line>
<line>
*nd, con*equently,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ea*n*ngs
</line>
<line>
man*gement.
</line>
<line>
In
</line>
<line>
turn,
</line>
<line>
con*e*vatism
</line>
<line>
reduces
</line>
<line>
bot h
</line>
<line>
*v*rinves*ment
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
u*derinves*ment, **cau*e i* red*c** investment-cash f*ow sensitivity in *verinvestme*t firms
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*nd facilit**es access to
</line>
<line>
external fina*cing *n und*rinve*tmen* firms (ELAOUD; JARBO*I,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*017; GOMARIZ; B**LESTA, 2013). *ur*hermore, cons*rva*i*m re**ces ag*ncy problems
</line>
<line>
related to managem*nt decisions, *itiga*i*g *anagerial oppo*tun**m a*d allowing good debt
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
agreements *n an asymmetric i*formation
</line>
<line>
envi**nment (*HMED; DUELLM*N, 2*07;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
BALL; SHIVAK*MAR, 2*05; GARC*A LARA; GARCIA OSM*; PE*ALVA, 2009;
</line>
<line>
GARC*A-MEC*; *ARC*A-SANCHE*, 2018; LEVE*TIS; D**ITR*POULOS; OWUSU-
</line>
<line>
AN*AH, 2013).
</line>
<line>
Previo** literatur* also shows that private compa*ies ha*e l*wer F*nancial Re*ort*ng
</line>
<line>
Quality (F*Q), presumabl* due to the lower ma*ket dema*d for p*bl** information. The *RQ
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
** lowe* in countries w**h low investo* protection, bank-orie*ted fi*ancial s*stems,
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
gr*ater conf*rmity
</line>
<line>
bet*een tax and f*nanc*al *epor*ing rul*s (CH** et a*., 2*11). *hese
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
char*cte*istics are co*mon in civil law countries, especially Br*zil. R*search points to a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
greater ten*enc* ** earnings man*gement in these
</line>
<line>
countries compared with countries
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
charact*rized by com*on la*, capi*a* ma*ket-based fina*cing, stron* accou**ing pr*fessi*n,
</line>
<line>
hig* level of development, and a*equa*e accoun**ng education (ALI; HWAN*, 2000; *ALL;
</line>
<line>
KOTHAR*; RO*IN, 2000).
</line>
<line>
In emerging ma*kets, private *omp*nies *inance investmen*s *rom outside sources -
</line>
<line>
i*clud*ng bank loan*, private equi** issues, leasing, commercia* *red*t, financin* fro* special
</line>
<line>
*evelopmen* agencies or go*e*nments, *nd *nformal finan*ing (*in*n*in* from loan s*arks,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
fami*y, a*d fr*ends) - a*d f*o* retained
</line>
<line>
earnings and additional co*tr**uti*n* from
</line>
<line>
owners
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(BECK; *EMIRGUC-K*NT; MAKS*MOVIC, 2008). A large body of literature docume*ts
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
how
</line>
<line>
the availabi*ity of external or
</line>
<line>
*nternal fu*d* aff*c*s investment de**sio*s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(B*ANC*ARD; LOPEZ-DE-S*LAN*S; SHLEI**R, 1994; M**R*; MAJLUF, 1984).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
These studies used samples of publicly t**ded compan*es
</line>
<line>
th*t depen* mainly on capi*al
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
deb* fi*anc**g. For pri*ate comp**ies,
</line>
<line>
external funding source* are generally lim*ted
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
consist main*y of *a*k loans a*d commercial credit. Without a**r*ctive *omes**c investm*nt
</line>
<line>
op*ortunities, man***rs *f these *om*anies *hoose to keep u*expe**ed cash i*side the
</line>
<line>
compa*y, ra**er t*a* dis*ributing it to investors in the fo*m of *iv*de*ds, shar* *e**r*hases,
</line>
<line>
or debt red*ction.
</line>
<line>
Chen et al. (2*1*) **s* a*gue tha* the fun*ing source will aff*ct the relati*ns*ip
</line>
<line>
between FRQ and investment ef*iciency. Bank loans a*e the most commo* s*ur*e of external
</line>
<line>
*ev. FSA, Teresina, v. 1*, n. 04, art. 3, p. 47-*7, abr. 2*21 www4.fs**et.com.br/revis*a
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
*arni*gs Q*ality and I**e*tment Effic*ency: An Ana*ysi* o* El*ctricity **mpanie* Listed i* B3
</line>
<line>
*5
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
capital for *rivate c*mpa*ies
</line>
<line>
*n develo*ing countries (BECK; DEMIR*UC-KUNT;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
MAK*IMOVIC, 2008). T*is *s due to *inancial diff*culti*s, real*oc*ti*n of re*ources,
</line>
<line>
a**
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
accepta*ce or reject*on
</line>
<line>
of investments. Banks *an *ccess in*ormat*on oth*r th*n financi*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
st*tements, po*ent*ally *e*uci*g **e i*port*n** of t*e account**g i*formation disclose* i*
</line>
<line>
financi** repor*s. Howe**r, in addition to the l*rge body of *esearch do*umenting the ro*e of
</line>
<line>
**counting information for lending d*ci**ons in the US and *ther d*veloped *ountries, th*re is
</line>
<line>
also evidence that b**k* rely on bo*rowers\ finan*ial reports in *redit *ecisions in emergin*
</line>
<line>
market* (a* is t*e case in Brazil) and for s*all *irms (*ERRY; GRA*T, 200*; BER*Y;
</line>
<line>
FAU*KNER, 1993; DANOS; H*LT; IMHOFF JR, 19*9). In c*mparison wit* o*her *xternal
</line>
<line>
capi*al *roviders that r*ly mor* *n **tual trust and priv*te communication, *anks *re li*ely
</line>
<line>
to examine the fina*cial *tatements of corporat* clients more car*f*lly.
</line>
<line>
The rel*tio*ship b*twe*n earnin*s quality *nd investment eff*ciency in emerging
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
coun*ries
</line>
<line>
(*specially Brazi*) shows that higher EQ *akes manage*s *ore res*onsi*le,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
allow*ng bet*er monitorin*, reduci*g advers* selection and mor*l haz*rd, and *ence reducing
</line>
<line>
in*ormation asym**tries. In other wor*s, higher EQ could impro*e inv*stm*nt efficiency
</line>
<line>
(ELAOUD; JARBOUI, 2017; GOMARIZ; BALLESTA, 2013; BUSHMAN; *MITH, 20*1;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
MCNICH*L*; STUBBEN, 2008). With this i* mi*d and co*sideri*g the p*r*icular**ies
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
these e*erging ma*k*ts and th*ir main source* of financing, we elabor**ed *he *ollowing
</line>
<line>
hypo**esis:
</line>
<line>
= there is a *ignifi*ant *nd posi*ive relationship betwee* ear*ings *u*lity *n*
</line>
<line>
in*estment effici*ncy of electricity compa**es *isted in B*.
</line>
<line>
Consi*eri*g that reducin* infor*ation a*ymm*trie* can mitigat* un*erinvest*en* and
</line>
<line>
over*nvestme*t prob*ems (*LAOUD; JARBO*I, 20*7; GOM*R*Z; BALLESTA, 2013), we
</line>
<line>
elaborated t*e following hypothes*s:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
= th*re is a signifi*ant and positive relation*hi* between earnings
</line>
<line>
qua*ity and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
investment *fficiency in a sce*a*io of overinv*st*ent in electr*ci*y companies l*s*ed *n B3.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
= *h**e i* a signi*ican* and positive relationship be*we*n earning*
</line>
<line>
qu*lity
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
investmen* **f**ienc* i* a scena*io *f unde*inve*tment in elec**ic*ty **mp*nies listed i* B3.
</line>
<line>
3 M*TH*DOLOG*
</line>
<line>
This research used d*ta from th* financial sta*ements published *nd made a*ail*ble *n
</line>
<line>
the website of Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão [B]3. *he sample initially comprised 5* comp*n*es in the
</line>
<line>
Rev. *SA, Tere*ina PI, *. 18, n. 0*, art. 3, p. 47-67, **r. 2021 www4.fsanet.com.*r/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. M. F. C*sta, T. P. Fe*nandes, J. P. Silva, R. M. N*riller
</line>
<line>
56
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
electricity secto*. The data *n*l*zed covers *he p*riod *rom
</line>
<line>
2010 to 2*17. The fin*l *ample
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
consisted o* 57 companies, *heref*re without excl*sion.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
3.* In*e*tm*nt E**i**ency
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Conceptua*ly, investment e*ficien*y means u*d**taking all projects with *ositive a
</line>
<line>
NPV. Biddle, Hil*ry and *er*i (2009) and Gomariz and Ballesta (2013), among others, use a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
mod*l *hat consi*ers *nve*tment *n *er*s
</line>
<line>
of gro*th opportunities. Speci*ica*ly, in**stment
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
eff*cien*y wi*l ex*st when there
</line>
<line>
i* no deviation from t*e *xpected level of investmen*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
However, the*e are fir*s **at inv*st ab*ve the ideal value (p*siti** deviati*** from the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
exp*cte* investment), *hile
</line>
<line>
there a lack is
</line>
<line>
*f investment for those th*t do not carry out al*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
p*ofitable projects (negat*ve deviations f*om th* exp*cted in*estment).
</line>
<line>
To esti*ate the expected level of i**e*t*e*t for firm i i* year *, ** spec*fy a mode*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
that pr*dicts *he le*el of *n*est*ent *ased on growth opportunities (as me**ured
</line>
<line>
by sales
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
growth). Devi**ions from the model, reflected in the error term of the inves*m*nt m*del,
</line>
<line>
represent investment ine*ficiency (BI*DLE; H*LARY; V*RD*, *009; GOM*RIZ;
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
BALL*STA, *013). *he basis fo* me*suring profit ** net profit (NP). Th* metric used
</line>
<line>-</line>
</par><par>
</par>
</page><page>
<par>
<line>
Earnin*s Quality a*d In*e*tment Eff*cien*y: An Analysi* of Electr*city Compan*es *isted in B3
</line>
<line>
57
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
efficiency (
</line>
<line>
); b) t*e absolu**
</line>
<line>
value of posit*v* residuals, considered *s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
overin**stment, a higher *alue means greater inefficiency t*rough ove*inves**ent; c) the
</line>
<line>
*bsolut* valu* o* *egative residua*s, con*ide*ed a* underinves*m*n*, multiplied by minu* one
</line>
<line>
(-1), a **g*er value means greater inefficiency through under*nvestment.
</line>
<line>
*.2 Ea*nings Quality
</line>
<line>
F*r *arn**gs *u*lity p*oxy, this research conside*s the studies of Dechow and Schr*nd
</line>
<line>
(200*); Dechow, Ge *n* *c*ra*d (*0*0), and Perotti and Wagenh**er (2*14). We a*so used
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t*e earnings *ersist*nce mo*el,
</line>
<line>
often addre*sed in the literature. The *asis for *easur*ng
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
profit is net pr*fit (NL). The met*ic
</line>
<line>
use* - m*asure*ent ** *ime series -, Per*istence (EQ1)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(*r absence o* it), is equal to the res*duals of *he follo*ing regression:
</line>
<line>
(2)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
W*ere:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
NP is the net profit, d*vid*d by total ass*ts at *he beginn*ng *f p*ri*d t.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The use of residuals is ju*tified *ince the re*ults of D*chow and Dic*ev (2002)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
show * negative relationshi* between the sta*dard
</line>
<line>
*eviation o* the residual *nd per*iste*ce,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
and betw**n the l*vel of accr*als and p*rs**tence.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*erefore, *e assumed *hree premises, a* *ollows:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1.
</line>
<line>
The higher t** magnitude of accruals (in this ca*e the *esidua*s of Equa*ion 1),
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
th* lo**r the e*rnings quali*y (*ec*ow & **chev, 2002);
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2.
</line>
<line>
The lower t*e m*gnitude *f accrua*s (in this c*se the res*duals of Equation 1),
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the higher the persist*nce (Dech** & Dichev, 2002);
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
3.
</line>
<line>
Nega*iv* relations*ip betwe*n the st*ndar* deviation of th* res**uals *nd
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
p*rs*sten** (Dechow & Dichev, 2002).
</line>
<line>
Th**efore, greater volatil*ty of the r*sidu**s in E*uation (*) *an c*rrespond to
</line>
<line>
lower earning* *uality. We used re*res*ion *esi*uals (2) in this study as a proxy for ear*ings
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
quali** in relation *o pers**te*ce, *** as an indep*nde*t variable in the OL* r*gression
</line>
<line>-</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Equation (3) - ** tes* the a**ociat*on betw*e* earnings quality and inves**ent *fficiency,
</line>
<line>
according to model 3.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. **A, T*re*ina PI, *. 18, n. 0*, a*t. 3, *. *7-67, abr. 20*1
</line>
<line>
w*w4.f*anet.c*m.b*/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. *. F. *osta, T. *. Fern*ndes, J. P. Silva, R. *. *oriller
</line>
<line>
5*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
3.3 Model Sp*cificatio*
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
Varia*le
</line>
<line>
Expect*d Sign*l
</line>
<line>
Justific*tion
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Expla**to*y *aria*le
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Persis*e*ce (P*R)
</line>
<line>
Pos*tive
</line>
<line>
Inc*e*sed pr*fit *uality results in grea*er inves*ment efficiency (He*ly and Pal*p*, 2001; Lambert and **uz a*d Ve*recchia, 20*7).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Co*trol V*riable
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
<line>
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Capital S*ructure (EC)
</line>
<line>
Positive
</line>
<line>
De b t matur*ty reduces excess*ve investment (Mello a nd Miranda, 2010) However, the *ole o* debt ma*urity under i*fo*mational asymmetr* has sh*wn that the use of short- **rm de*t is a mechanism *hat can mitiga*e *nforma*ional asymmetrie* and *gency costs betwe*n share*olders, creditors and administrat*rs (Gomariz an* **llesta, 20*3)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Fi*m´s Size (TAM)
</line>
<line>
P*sitive
</line>
<line>
The size of th* c**pany ha* a posi**ve relat*onship wi*h inv**tme*t efficie*cy, ** evidenced in Lee's (200*) work *ith US publicly trade* compani*s.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Chang* in S*areholders\ Equity (V**)
</line>
<line>
Po*itive
</line>
<line>
The increase in shareholders' equity may result in greater *fficiency in t*e allocation of invest*ents (Petri*, Capraru and Ihn*tov, *01*; Menguc, Auh a*d Ozanne, 2010)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Source: Prepared by the authors.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Re*. FSA, Teresina, v. 18, n. 04, art. 3, p. 47-67, abr. **21
</line>
<line>
www4.fsanet.**m.br/**vi*ta
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Earn*ngs Quality and I*ve*tmen* *ff*ciency: An A*alysis o* *lect*ici*y *o*pan*es *isted *n B*
</line>
<line>
5*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
4 ANAL*SIS OF RESULTS
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Table 1 shows the de*criptive st*tistic* of the varia*les adopt*d in the research, in
</line>
<line>
which: a) in*Ef* had a mean and m*dia* gre*t*r t**n zero, th*s s*owing a si*uation *f
</line>
<line>
overin*estment grea*er than t*at of und*r*nvestment. Th*s result differ* from t** work by
</line>
<line>
Gom*riz and *allesta (2013), which presen*e* a *ean and *edian low*r than zero, therefo**,
</line>
<line>
pr*valen*e o* u*derinvestment; b) *C h*s an av**age o* 0.7*%, demons*rating the p*eva**nce
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
third party *apital in rel*tion *o eq**ty, increasi*g the ris* o* in*estment* in *r*jects o*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
these co*panies; *) NPV *ith an a*erage of 0.003% and a high coefficie*t of *ariation (i.*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
grea*er *h*n
</line>
<line>
20%), pos*i*ly *emon*trati*g the low reinvestment of reported profits, mainly
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
due to the *o*sibil*ty of dis*ributing co*stant di*idends; e) TAM has an average of m**e than
</line>
<line>
R $ *0 milli*n, showing t** *x*stence *f companies, *ostly *onsolidated i* the marke*, such
</line>
<line>
as Blue Chips and *id Caps. Ho*e*er, there was a high coeffi*ient of var*atio*, also
</line>
<line>
demonstrating the e*iste*ce o* Sm*ll Caps.
</line>
<line>
Table 1 - Descriptive statistics
</line>
<line>
St*ndard
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
VA**AB*E
</line>
<line>
Average
</line>
<line>
Median
</line>
<line>
*aximu* Minimum
</line>
<line>
De*iatio*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
I*vEff
</line>
<line>
2.95e-18
</line>
<line>
0 .0 3 2 5 5
</line>
<line>
* .4 7 1 5 *
</line>
<line>
-3.31611
</line>
<line>
-8.*1636
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ER
</line>
<line>
0 .* 0 0 0 0
</line>
<line>
0 .0 0 4 3 5
</line>
<line>
0 .9 * * 3 9
</line>
<line>
-1.*86*2
</line>
<line>
0 .1 * 0 5 3
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
EC
</line>
<line>
* .7 4 1 0 *
</line>
<line>
0 .7 * 4 7 1
</line>
<line>
* .9 7 7 7 *
</line>
<line>
0 .0 3 1 1 1
</line>
<line>
0 .1 3 0 5 6
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
TAM
</line>
<line>
1 0 .2 * * .4 2 5 4 ,7 5 0 ,4 9 1
</line>
<line>
1.73e+08
</line>
<line>
0 .0 * 0 0 0
</line>
<line>
2 0 ,* 1 9 ,6 6 *
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
VPL
</line>
<line>
0 .0 6 3 5 7
</line>
<line>
* .* 2 5 4 6
</line>
<line>
3 .8 9 * 6 3
</line>
<line>
-6.*9**4
</line>
<line>
0 .6 2 * 7 2
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Source: *r*p**ed by t*e aut**rs.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
T*rou*h the Variation I*flation F*ctor (VI*), t*ere was *n ev*dent abs*n*e of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
multico**inearity *f *he *ari*bles adopted
</line>
<line>
in the research, *h*re*or*, not co*promisi*g
</line>
<line>
t h*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
estimation of th* researc* equatio*s. In turn, the o*her t*st* were performed, i.*., normality of
</line>
<line>
resi**es, h*moscedasticity and autoco*re**tion. *s for normality, the Jarqu*-Ber* *est
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
indicated tha* the residues do n*t follow a norm*l distribu*ion. St*ll, the **rmality o*
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
residues wa* not *erified. H*wev**, the **ntral Limit Theor*m (e.g. GUJ*RAT*; PORTER,
</line>
<line>
2*11) was *s*d, in whi** **r samples larg*r than 10* obse*v*tions t** norma* distrib*tion is
</line>
<line>
assumed.
</line>
<line>
As for the autocorrelatio* of resi*ues, *ts **s*nce was verified th*o*gh the Durbin-
</line>
<line>
Watson test. For heteroscedasticity, the estimation was p*rfor*e* w*th Whit* *o*rection. *n
</line>
<line>
a*di*i*n, *tationari*y tests were performed, (a) ADF - Fisher and (b) PP - Fisher, *ndicat*n*
</line>
<line>
stationarity at the lev*l of the resea*ch v**i*bles, I (0). In t*me, t*e Breusch-Pag** test *n* the
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Teres**a *I, *. 18, n. 0*, art. 3, p. 47-67, abr. 202* www4.f*anet.com.br/re*ist*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. M. F. Cost*, T. P. Fern*ndes, J. P. Sil*a, R. M. Nor*ller
</line>
<line>
60
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
F (*how) test were performed to det*ct th* best model an* t** resul*s
</line>
<line>
showed the Cros*-
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
section Fixe* (A) as highlighted in Table *. In t*me, considering t*e se*re*ation to *ighlight
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the re*ationshi* be*wee* quality o* pr*fi* and efficiency of inve*tme*ts in * scenar*o
</line>
<line>
*f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
superinvestments and su*investm*nt*, it wa* n*cessary to adop* B and C est*mation, Cross-
</line>
<line>
s*ctio* Fixed.
</line>
<line>
Table 2 - Regres*ion Analysis o* the Profit Q*ality a*d Investment Eff*ciency *aria*les
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
Source: Prepared by t*e authors.
</line>
<line>
In "A" estimation, t*e positive and significa*t 1% relationship between *ER and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
InvEff w*s *vident. conf*r**ng the first
</line>
<line>
hypothes*s of the r*search, in conver*e*ce w**h
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
wor*s of *iddle, Hi*ary and Verdi (2009), G*mariz and Bal*es*a (20**), Hea*y *n* P***pu
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(2001), Lambe**, Leuz a*d *errecchia (200*), so that *ne ca* infer that *h* in**e*se in
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
q*ality of i*f*r*atio*, meas*re* by the *ersist*nce o* *rof*ts, can mitigate th* *n*ff**iency of
</line>
<line>
inv*st*ent*. *hi* *act may be relat*d to the possi*i*it* of be*te* mon*toring, which wo*ld be
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*educi*g *d*er*e selection
</line>
<line>
*nd moral hazard, resulting in * red*ction in infor*atio*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
asymmetry.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Regarding the contro* varia*les, the r*su*t of the estimation sho*ed *n inverse
</line>
<line>
relations*ip between th* size of the company and *he effi*i*ncy of investments, a* the level of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
5%. *h*s fac*or may have bee* caused ** the s*gn*ficant va*ia*ion b*t*een
</line>
<line>
*he *izes of
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. F*A, *er**ina, v. 18, n. **, art. *, *. 47-67, abr. 2021 w*w4.fsane*.co*.*r/revis*a
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Earn*ngs Qu*lity and Investment Efficiency: An Analysis of Electricity *om*ani** *isted *n B3
</line>
<line>
61
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
companies li*t** in B3, *.e., *h* signif*can* presenc* of Small Caps and Mid Caps, *o*p*ni*s
</line>
<line>
less cons*lidated in the market **d of *r*ater *isk, w*en comp*red wi*h Blue Chips. Thus, the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
large* t*e compa*y, mea*ured by the *olu*e of *eve*ues, the
</line>
<line>
lower *he *ffi*iency of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*vestme*ts. *or the other co*trol variables, *C and NPV, the c**fficients an* statistics were
</line>
<line>
not statistically significant, th** not allowing greater infer*nces.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*on*idering o*ly the scenario *f
</line>
<line>
overinves*ment, estimat*on "B", the estimation
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
results s*owed a po*itiv* and significant relat*onship at 5% of P** with InvE*f. co**irming
</line>
<line>
the **cond hypothesis of *he research, *n con*erge*ce wi*h the works of *i*d*e, Hi*ary *nd
</line>
<line>
Verdi (2009) a*d Goma*iz and Ball*sta (2013), so th*t it can *e inferred that *he inc**ase in
</line>
<line>
the quality of infor**ti*n, measu*ed *y the p*rsistence of profits, *an mitigate the
</line>
<line>
ineffic*enc* of in*estmen*s related to overinvestm*nt. *t*e*wise, companies that show higher
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
qua*ity o* i*formati*n, thr*ugh persistence, ena*le mana*ers to better base the*r
</line>
<line>
*nv**tment
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
de*isions, allow*ng them to reduce **cessive investme**s, *owards the optimal investment.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Anothe*
</line>
<line>
possible i*ference is tha* companies that *ho* greater pr*fit pers*stenc* have mor*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
e**ici*nt managers in the *llo*ation of resour**s, in order to reduce excess*ve i***stmen*s.
</line>
<line>
*egarding the contr*l vari*bles, a* inverse relationship was found between capital
</line>
<line>
structure and invest**nt efficiency, so t*a* the greate* the use of third *ar*y ca*it*l, the lower
</line>
<line>
t*e investm*nt effici*ncy, at the l*vel o* 5%. This divergen*e evidenced may be related to the
</line>
<line>
concentra*io* of o*nership in emergi*g co**tri*s, especially i* Braz*lian companies, *ince a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*reater concentration o* *wner*hip wo*ld be used *s a co*porate
</line>
<line>
*overnance mechanism to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
**tigat* information asymme*ry. Othe*wise, *he incr*ase in the
</line>
<line>
use of third party
</line>
<line>
capit*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
would increase the ri*k
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
*ompa*ies,
</line>
<line>
which m*y incu* in the execution of in*fficient
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
projec**.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
As f** *he NPV variable, higher equity values *epresent grea*er investm*nt ef*iciency.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The compan*es that p*esent the g*e*tes* vari*tion in sharehold*rs' *quity
</line>
<line>
*re generally
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
growing *ompani*s, whic* ar* align*d
</line>
<line>
with the reali*a*ion
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
*alue-gen*ratin* projects.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Othe*wise, the **nag*rs of these companies *re more aligned w*th the all**atio* of reso**ces
</line>
<line>
*n pr*jects that **eate va*ue for sh**ehold*rs. The **M variabl* did not prese*t statist*cal
</line>
<line>
s**nificance.
</line>
<line>
S*b*e*uent*y, co*sidering the under*nvestment scenar*o, no statistica* significance
</line>
<line>
was found between the reducti*n *n InvEff and PER. Thus, it *s *ot possible to infer that the
</line>
<line>
quality *f pro*i*, *s me*s*r*d b* pe*si*tence, mitigates unde*i*ve*tmen*. For this scenario, the
</line>
<line>
control variabl*s w*re not statistically significant.
</line>
<line>
*ev. FSA, Te**sina PI, v. 18, n. 0*, *rt. 3, p. 47-67, a*r. *021 www*.fsanet.com.*r/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. M. F. Cos*a, T. P. Fern*ndes, *. *. Silva, R. M. No*iller
</line>
<line>
*2
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Consid*ring *he *arti*ular*ties of the *lectric **ctor i* Brazil, espe*ially *h* strong
</line>
<line>
regulation, m*na*ers are *ncour*ged to reduce *x*essive investme** or *o *nvest i* pr*j*cts
</line>
<line>
that *reate value. In other w*rds, the regulat**n *f th* *e*tor *an inf*uence t** quality of the
</line>
<line>
informat*on evidenced *n t*e financial reports and, at *he same ti*e, a*low the mana*er* of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t*ese
</line>
<line>
com*anies *ssential informatio* to
</line>
<line>
r*duc* overin*estm*nt. On the ot*er ha**, these
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*actors *o not m*tiga*e *nderinve*tm*nt. In th*s way, th* regulation of the Brazilian electr*c*ty
</line>
<line>
**c*or, the *easure *hat confe*s greater quality of information throu*h persisten*e, *i*iga*es
</line>
<line>
overin*estment **d does not impact on underinves*ment.
</line>
<line>
In sh*rt, *he first a*d second hypothes*s o* t*e r*search were *on**r*ed, ie, there is a
</line>
<line>
p*sitive an* signific*nt relationship be*w*en the ef**cie*cy of th* inves*me*t **d the *uality
</line>
<line>
of the profit, meas**ed b* the persistence, of t*e *om*anies of t*e electric *n*rgy sub-sector
</line>
<line>
of Brasil, B*lsa, Bal*ão [B] 3 and there is a positive and sig*ifica*t relationship between *h*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
eff*ciency of the in*estment,
</line>
<line>
in a scena*io of over*nvestm**t, with the qu*lity *f p*ofit,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
measured b* the persistence, of *h* compa*ies in the sub-sector
</line>
<line>
5 FI*AL CONSIDER*TIONS
</line>
<line>
The presen* s*u*y highli**ts the relat*onship between the ef*iciency of in*est*ents
</line>
<line>
an* the prof*t quality *f co*pan*e* in the B*az*lian elec*ricity sub-se*tor, *olsa, Balcão [*] 3,
</line>
<line>
c*nsideri*g *s a *ypothesis, *he existen*e *f a positive relationshi* betwe*n pr*fit q*ality and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
investment e**i*iency. The main
</line>
<line>
hypot*e*is *as *roken down, distingu*shi*g two different
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
scenario*: a) *verinvestment; *n*, b) unde*investment. The research assumes a po*itive
</line>
<line>
r*lat*onship between invest**n* *ua*ity and efficiency, in b**h scen*rios, *o that t*e inc*ease
</line>
<line>
*n the *uality of *rofit mitigat*s both overinvestment and *n*erinvestment.
</line>
<line>
The r*sults indicate a pos*tive an* signi*ican* 1% r*lations*ip *e*ween the ef*ic*e*cy
</line>
<line>
of the i*v*s*ments and the quality of the pr*fit, co**irming t*e first hypothesi* *f *he resear**,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
c*nv*rging with the previou* su*vey*, carried out i* t** E*ropean Unio* *nd
</line>
<line>
in th* U*A.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Thus, even in emergin* economies, as is the ca*e i* Br*zil, the q*al*ty o* infor*a*ion can
</line>
<line>
a*low b*tter decisions to *e made by *an*gers, as highl*gh*ed by Bu*hman and S*ith (200*)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
and Gom*riz
</line>
<line>
*nd Ballesta (2013). In addi*ion, anoth*r
</line>
<line>
factor
</line>
<line>
tha*
</line>
<line>
may have influen*ed
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
r*s**ts the b*tter monitor*** re*at*d to the high qu*lit* of *rofit, which mitigate* adverse is
</line>
<line>
selectio* and moral haza*d. T*us, the thre* types of regu*ation practi*ed *y ANEEL (i - the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
te*hn*cal reg**a*ion
</line>
<line>
of service standa*ds,
</line>
<line>
such a* gen*r**ion, transmission, distributi*n an*
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Re*. FSA, Teresi*a, v. 18, n. 04, art. 3, p. 47-67, *br. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.fsanet.*om.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Earnings *uality and Investment *ff*cie*cy: An Analysis of Electrici*y Companies Listed in B3
</line>
<line>
63
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
co*mercialization; ** - the economic re***ation, in relation to tariffs and the m*rket; and, iii -
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
of research
</line>
<line>
and developme*t
</line>
<line>
projects and en*rgy efficie*cy) *y re*ucing advers* selection
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
and moral *azard, it raise* *he qua*i** of the inform**i*n s**wn in the financia* reports
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
allow* m*nag*rs t* i*enti*y better investment *p*ortu*it*es.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
I* could be h*ghlighted, t*e relation*hip between the sou*ces *f financin*, in emer*ing
</line>
<line>
markets, i* part* d*rected to the ba*king *ector, in line with Chen et al. (*0*1) as it would
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
affec*
</line>
<line>
the relationship *etween *RQ and in****me*t effi**ency. *owever, *ven though b*nk
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
loans are the *os* c*mmon s*urce *f *oreign *apital *o* privat* compani*s i* deve*op*ng
</line>
<line>
count*ies, ban*s' access to a*ditional in**r*atio*, in addition to *in*n*ial s*ateme**s, has not
</line>
<line>
po*entiall* re*uced the impo*t*nc* o* the acc*unti*g i*formatio* disclosed in **n***ial
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
re*orts, for *l***ric power comp*nies listed in B*azil, Bolsa, Bal*ão [B]
</line>
<line>
3. *conom*c
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
regul*tion and r*s*a*ch a*d *evel**ment pro*ect* would tend to r**ect proje*ts with a higher
</line>
<line>
cost of capital, esp*cially those arising from bank *o*ns. In non-regulated sect*rs, **ere may
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
be
</line>
<line>
gre*t*r discretion in the use of third party and own capital, allowi*g the manage* t* take
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
greate* *isks in *earc* o* *reater value for s*arehol*ers, resulti*g *n th* executi*n o* projects
</line>
<line>
financ*d wi*h **i*d pa*** *esources.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The s*c*nd hypothesis of *he research was a*so *onfir*e*, since, from
</line>
<line>
th e
</line>
<line>
re*ults, it
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
can be *nf**red that the incre*se in the qual*ty of informa*ion reduces ove*investment,
</line>
<line>
conv*rging with Hi*shle*f*r, Hou, T*oh and Zhan* (2004), Biddle et al. (2*09) and Chen et
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
a*. (*01*) who r*ported that high*r quality of informati** helps
</line>
<line>
to
</line>
<line>
*ncoura*e compa*ies of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
excessive investme*t to decrea*e t*eir level of inve*tmen*. However,
</line>
<line>
the third
</line>
<line>
hypothe*i*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ca***t be con*irme*; it cannot be inferr*d t*at the incre*s* in the quality of profit mi*igates
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
un*er**ve*t*ent, diverging f*o* Hi*s*leifer,
</line>
<line>
Hou, Teoh and Zhang (2004), Biddl* et al.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(2009) a*d Chen et **. (2011), in whic* hig*er qua*ity of *nformation helps to encou*age low
</line>
<line>
*nv*stment companies t* make investment*. Conservatism, associate* with regulation, even
</line>
<line>
facili*a*ing access to exter*a* fi*ancin* in relation to sub-invest*ng companies, could *i*igat*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t*e increase in i*vestmen*s, towar*s the o*t*mal level of in*es*m*nts. I* this case,
</line>
<line>
these
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ecu*iar aspects *f emerg*n* market* wo*ld
</line>
<line>
*e negative*y *nflue*c*n* the r*lati*nship
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
*etwe*n quality of pro*it an* red*ction of *nde*inves*ment.
</line>
<line>
*he r**ults highl*g*ted in the survey cannot *e generalize* *o other se*tors in Bra*il,
</line>
<line>
*olsa, Balcão [B] 3 *n* also *o el*ctric energy c*mpanies no* l*sted. A*oth** imp*rtant point,
</line>
<line>
the research c**not be gen*r*li*ed to the per*od prior to t*e p*o**ss of c*nver*ence to IFRS,
</line>
<line>
i.e., *rior to the calendar year 20*0.
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, *eresina PI, v. 18, n. 04, art. 3, p. 47-67, abr. 2*21 w*w4.fsanet.com.br/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. *. *. Cos**, T. P. Fernandes, J. P. Silva, R. M. Noril*er
</line>
<line>
64
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*or new research, it is su*g*sted to ver*fy (i) t*e r*lations*i* of investm*nt *ffic*ency
</line>
<line>
*i** other **oxies of profit qual*ty, (i*) test of the rese*rch hypothesis consi*ering the totality
</line>
<line>
*f companie* in Br*sil, *olsa, *alcão [B] 3 *nd ( iii) *ons*der *n the sample s*vera* *ount*ies,
</line>
<line>
*hether de*elo**d or developing.
</line>
<line>
BIBLIO*RAPHIC REF*REN*ES
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ahm*d, A. S., & *u*ll*an, S. (2007). Acc*unting
</line>
<line>
con*ervat*sm and *oard
</line>
<line>
of director
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
char*cte*istics: An empirical anal*si*. Jour*al *f Accou*ting a*d Ec*no**cs, 43(2e3), 411 -
</line>
<line>
437. http://doi.or*/10.101*/j.*a*ceco.2007.01.*05.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ali, A.; Hwang, L.S. (200*). Country-s*ecific
</line>
<line>
fac*ors re**ted to *inan*ial repo*ti*g and the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*alue
</line>
<line>
r*le***ce of ac*ounti*g
</line>
<line>
data. Journ*l of Accounting Resea*ch, 38(1): *-21.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
DOI:10.230*/2672920htt*s://www.jstor.org/stable/2672920.
</line>
<line>
*gên*ia Nacional de En*rgia Elétr*ca. 2013. Pla*o Anual de Ope*ações 2013. Dis*onív*l em:
</line>
<line>
<http://*ww.aneel.gov.br/aplica*oes/*udienci*/arquivo/2012/107/documento/
</line>
<line>
plano_anu*l_de_operacao_2013_19n**20*2.p*f>. Ace*so em: 25/04/2018.
</line>
<line>
Associação Nacio*al de Co*s*midores de *nergia. 2018. Organização I*s*itucional do Setor
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Elétrico.
</line>
<line>
Dis*oní*el
</line>
<line>
e*:
</line>
<line>
<http://ww*.anacebras*l.org.br/*nerg**/setor-
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
eletrico/#14*492318*371-ca796*0e-d30d>. Ac*s*o e*: *5/04/201*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ag*eva, A. (*008).
</line>
<line>
An
</line>
<line>
ex*mination of the effect *f *nterna*ional investors
</line>
<line>
on *ccounting
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
information qualit* in *ussia. Advances in Accounting,
</line>
<line>
*4(2), 157-161.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
http://*oi.org/10.101*/j.a*iac.20*8.08.001.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2*05). Ea*nin*s qu*lity in UK pr*vate firms: Comparative loss
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
recogn*tion t*melin*ss. Jour*a* of Ac*ounting and Econ*mic*,
</line>
<line>
*9(1),
</line>
<line>
8*-128.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
h*tp://doi.org/10.*01*/j.ja*ceco.2004.04.001.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ba*l, R.; Kothari, S.P.; *ob*n, A. (2000). The e*fec* of i*ternational instituti*nal fa*tors
</line>
<line>
on
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*r*pe*ties of accounting earnin*s. Jou*n*l of *cc*unting *nd Ec*nomics, 29(1): 1-51.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*iddle, G. C., Hilary, G., & Verdi, R. S. (2**9). How d**s f*nanci*l reporting quality relate to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
investme*t effi*ie*cy? Journa*
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
Accountin* and Econ*mics, 48(2-*), 1*2-1*1.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
h*tp://doi.org/10.101*/j.jacce**.2009.09.001
</line>
<line>
*iddl*, *. C., & Hilary, G. (2006). Ac*o*nting **ality and Firm-*evel Capit*l In*estment.
</line>
<line>
*he Accounting Review, 81(5), 963-98*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
BRASIL. Lei nº 12.78*, de 11 *e jan. ** 20*3. As c**ce*sões de geração, *ransmissão
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
d*strib*iç*o de energ** el*trica, *o*re * red*ção dos encargos setoriais e sobre a modic*dade
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
tari*ária, B*así*ia, DF, j*n 2*13. Disponive*
</line>
<line>
em: <http://w*w.planalto.gov.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
br/cci*il_03/_Ato*011-2014/2*13/L*i/l12783.h*m>. A*esso em: 25/04/2018.
</line>
<line>
Bushm*n, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Fina*ci*l Account*ng Information and Corp*rate
</line>
<line>
*ev. FSA, *eres**a, v. 18, n. 04, ar*. 3, p. 47-67, abr. 2021 www4.*sanet.*om.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Earnin*s Q**lity and In*estment Effi*iency: An Analy**s of Elec*ricity Com*anies Listed in B3
</line>
<line>
65
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Governance. Jour*al of Ac*ounting & Economics, *3, 1-1*5. http://do*.org/10.1016/s0165-
</line>
<line>
4*01(97)0*004-9
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Chan, *. L. C., Lee, E., & Lin, *. (2*09). The i*p*ct
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
**counting informati*n *uality on
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the *ispricing of ac*rua*s: *he ca*e of FRS3 in th* UK. Journal A*coun*ing and Publi* of
</line>
<line>
Po*icy, 28(3), *89-206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpub*o*.2*09.04.002
</line>
<line>
*hen, C. *., L*l*, *. B., & Va*ce, T. *. (*014). W*y Do We Wor*? *mpirical Evide*ce on
</line>
<line>
*ork Motivati*n and the Effects of Man*gement Control Syst*m on Work Mo*ivat*on.
</line>
<line>
University of Illinoi* at *rban* -C**mpaign- *ep**tm*nt of Accountancy.
</line>
<line>
Che*, F., H*pe, O. K., Li, Q., & Wan*, X. (2011). Financial repor*i** quality and *nve*t*ent
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
efficiency o* priv*te firm* in emerg*ng markets. T*e Accounting Re*i*w,
</line>
<line>
**(4),
</line>
<line>
12*5-*288.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
h*tp://doi.org/1*.230*/accr-*0040
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
C*en, T., Xie, *., & Z*ang, Y. (2*1*). Ho* does *nalysts\ forecast qual*ty relate to co*porate
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
in*estme*t
</line>
<line>
eff*ciency?
</line>
<line>
Jou*nal
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
C o* po* ** e
</line>
<line>
Finance,
</line>
<line>
4*,
</line>
<line>
217-2*0.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ht*p://*oi.org/10.10*6/*.*corpfin.2016.1*.010
</line>
<line>
*rotty, J.R. (1992). Neo*lassical and Keynesian approache* to the the*** of *nvestment.
</line>
<line>
*ourna* of Post Keynesi** Economic* 14, 483-49*.
</line>
<line>
De*how, P. M., & Di*hev, I. *. (20*2). *he Qua**tyof Acc*uals a*d *arnings: *he R*le of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Accrual*
</line>
<line>
Es*imation
</line>
<line>
Erro*s.
</line>
<line>
* h*
</line>
<line>
Accounting
</line>
<line>
Review,
</line>
<line>
77,
</line>
<line>
35-59.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
http://*oi.o*g/10.*3*8/accr.2002.77.s-1.61
</line>
<line>
*echow, P., Ge, W., & S*hrand, C. (2*10). Understand*n* e*rni*gs q*a*i*y: A review of the
</line>
<line>
proxie*, their **t*r*inant* **d their *onsequences. Jo**nal of Acco**ti** a*d Economics,
</line>
<line>
50(2-3), *44-401. ht**://doi.org/10.1**6/j.jacceco.20*0.09.001
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
D*chow, P., & Schrand, C. (2004).
</line>
<line>
Earnin*s *uality. The *esearch Fou*datio*
</line>
<line>
of CFA
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
I*s*itute.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*emerj*an, P. R., L*v, B., Lewis, M. F. & McVa*, S. E. Mana*erial Ab*l*t* and Earni**
</line>
<line>
Q*ali*y. *h* *cco**ting Review, 88(2), 46*-*98. h*tp://doi.*rg/10.2308/ac*r-5*318.
</line>
<line>
*la**d, A., & Jarboui, A. (2017). A*ditor speci*lizat*on, accounting information qual*ty and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
**vestm*nt
</line>
<line>
e*ficiency. Re*ea*ch in International Busine*s and Finance,
</line>
<line>
42(June), 61*-629.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
h*tp://d*i.org/*0.10*6/j.ribaf.2*17.07.006
</line>
<line>
Fa*zari, S., Hubbard, *., & Pe*ersen, B. (2000). Investment-cash *w sens*ti*ities are not
</line>
<line>
useful: * comment on Kaplan and Zin*ale*. Quarter*y Journal of E**nomics 115, 695-705.
</line>
<line>
Garc**-Lara, J. M., G*rcía-O*ma, B., & Pena*va, *., (2010). Acco**ting conservati*m and
</line>
<line>
fi** investment efficienc*. Working paper.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Garc*a Lara, J., Garc** *sma, B., & Penalva, F. (2009). *c*ounting co*servatism
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
c*rpora*e governance. *eview
</line>
<line>
of Accounti*g S*udi*s,
</line>
<line>
14(1), 161 a
</line>
<line>
201.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ttp://doi.**g/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teresina *I, v. 18, n. 04, a*t. 3, *. *7-67, abr. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.fsa*et.com.br/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
E. *. F. Cos*a, T. P. Fernan*es, J. P. S*lva, R. *. Noriller
</line>
<line>
66
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
García-Meca, E., Garc*a-Sa*c*ez, I. M. (201*). Does managerial ability in*ence the quali*y
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
of financial r*porti*g? Europ*an ***agement Journal,
</line>
<line>
36(2018), 544 a
</line>
<line>
557.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
https://doi.*rg/10.1*16/j.*mj.201*.07.010.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*omariz, M. F. C., & B*llesta, J. P. S. (2014). Financial reporting qu*lity, deb* matu*ity and
</line>
<line>
in*e**ment efciency. J. Bank. F*nance 40, 494-*06.
</line>
<line>
Gomariz, M. *. C., & B**le*ta, J. P. *. (*01*). Finan*ial reportin* quality, *ebt matur*ty and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*vestment
</line>
<line>
efficienc*.
</line>
<line>
Journal
</line>
<line>
*f
</line>
<line>
*anking
</line>
<line>
&
</line>
<line>
Fina*ce,
</line>
<line>
1-*3.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.jban**in.2*13.07.013
</line>
<line>
Gord*n, M.*. (1*92). The Neoclassical and a p*st Key*esian theory of i**estment. Jo*rnal of
</line>
<line>
Po*t Key*esian E*onomics 14, 425-44*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Gujarati,
</line>
<line>
D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometri* *ásica. *mgh Editora.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ht*p://doi.org/10.1126/**i*nce.1186874
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Hayashi, F.
</line>
<line>
(1982). Tobin\s mar*inal * and average q: a n*oc*as*ic*l interpret*tion.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Eco*om**rica 50, 213-224.
</line>
<line>
Healy, *. *., & Pa*e*u, K. G. (2*01). A Review of the Empirical D*s*losu*e Lite*ature.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Jour*al
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
Ch*mi*al
</line>
<line>
Inform*tion
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
<line>
Modeling,
</line>
<line>
53(Dec*mbe*),
</line>
<line>
160.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781*0*415324.004
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Hirshle*fer, D., *ou,
</line>
<line>
K., *e*h, S.,
</line>
<line>
& Z*ang, Y. (2004). Do investors o*er*alue fi*ms wit*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
bloat*d ba*an*e shee**? J. *cco*nt. Econ. 38, 297-331.
</line>
<line>
H*pe, O., & *homas, W. (200*). Manag*rial e*pire building and firm disclosure. Jou*nal o*
</line>
<line>
Acc**nting R*search 46, 591-6*6.
</line>
<line>
Hubbard, *. (1998). *apital-marketim *erf*ctions and inve**ment. Journa* of Econo*ic
</line>
<line>
Literature 36, 193-225.
</line>
<line>
Hu, Z., Cai, W., Han, *., & *a, R. (2012). An empiric*l study of *he effect of venture c*pi*al
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
partic*pation *n the **counting in*ormat*on quality
</line>
<line>
of I*O f*r**. China *our*al of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Acco*n**ng Research, *(*), *51-268. ht*p://doi.org/1*.1016/j.cjar.2012.08.004
</line>
<line>
Jensen, M. C. ., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). *heory of the Firm: Managerial Be**vio*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ag*ncy
</line>
<line>
Costs and *wnership Structure. Journal of Financial *conomics, 3, 305-360.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
http://doi.o*g/10.1016/0304-405*(76)90026-X
</line>
<line>
Kaplan, S., & Zingales, L. (2000). Inves*ment-cas* ow sen*itivitie* a** n*t valid m*as*res o*
</line>
<line>
financi*g cons*r*int*. Quarte*ly Journal of Economic* 115, 707-712.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*a*lan, S.,
</line>
<line>
& Zingales, L. (199*). Do fin*ncing cons*raints ex*lain wh* investm*nt is
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
corre*ated wit* ca*h-o*s? *ua*terly Jou*nal of Eco*omic* 1*2, 169-21*.
</line>
<line>
Lam*ert, R., *euz, C., & Verr**chia, R. E. (2*07). Accoun*ing Information , Disclosure , and
</line>
<line>
*he Cost of Ca*ital. *ournal o* Accounting Research, 4*, 38*-*20.
</line>
<line>
Rev. F*A, Ter*sina, v. 1*, n. 04, art. 3, p. 47-67, *br. 2021 ww*4.fsanet.c*m.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
</document><par>
<line>
*arnings Quali*y a*d Investmen* Effici*ncy: An An**ysi* of Elect*ici*y Companies Lis*ed *n B3
</line>
<line>
*7
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Le***t**, S., Dimitr*po*los, P., & Owusu-Ansah, S. (2013). C*rp*rate gover*ance
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
accounting con*ervatism: *vidence fro* the
</line>
<line>
banking industry. Corporat* G*v*r**nce
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(Oxford), 21(3), 264 e 286. ht*p://doi.o*g/10.1111/co*g.12015.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Martin*z, J., Gar*ia, I., & Cu*dra*o, B. (20*5). Efect of financial *eporting quality
</line>
<line>
on
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
sustainability information disclosure. Cor*. S*c. *esponsib. *nviron. Manag. 22, 4*-64.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
McNi*h*ls, M. *., & Stubben, S. R. (2*08). Does earnings *anagement affect f*rm*\
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*n*est*ent
</line>
<line>
*ecisi*ns?
</line>
<line>
Accounting
</line>
<line>
Review,
</line>
<line>
*3(6),
</line>
<line>
15*1-1603.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
http://doi.org/10.2*08/ac*r.20*8.83.6.1571
</line>
<line>
Modig*ian*, F., & M*ller, M.H. (1958). The cost of capital, corp*r*tion finance and t*e t*eor*
</line>
<line>
of i*vestment. Am*rican E*onomic *ev. 48 (3), 261-*97.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
M**rs, *. C., & Majluf, *. S. (1984). *o*po*ate finan**ng a**
</line>
<line>
investment decisi**s when
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
firms
</line>
<line>
have
</line>
<line>
*n*ormation that investor* do not
</line>
<line>
ha*e. *ournal of Fin**cial Ec*n*mics, *3(2),
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*8*-221. ht*p://*oi.org/10.1016/0304-4*5X(84)9*023-0
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Pe**tti, P., & Wagenhofer, A. *arni*gs Quality M*asures and Exc*ss
</line>
<line>
*et*rns. Journal of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*usiness F*nance & Accounti*g, v. 4*, n. 5-6, p. **5-5**, *014.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*an, G., *an*, Q., Luo, S., & *han, K. C. (2*1*). Su*e*visory board *haracteristics
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
accounti*g infor*atio* quality: Evid*nce f*om *hi*a. Inte*n*tio**l Revi*w of E*ono*ics *nd
</line>
<line>
Fin*nce, 37, 18-32. h*tp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ir*f.*014.10.011
</line>
<line>
Silva, *. *., Borges, T. J. G., G*nçalves, R. de S., & N*s*imento, D. V. R. do. (2017).
</line>
<line>
Con*ergência ao P*drão IF*S e Suavização de Resultados em *mpres*s de *nerg*a Elétrica.
</line>
<line>
BASE - Rev*sta de Administração * Contabilidade D* Unisinos, 14(*), 2*1-29*.
</line>
<line>
http://doi.*rg/1*.4013/base.2*17.144.04
</line>
<line>
Yosh*ka*a, H. (1980). On the \\q\\ theory of investme*t. A*erica* *conomic Review 7*,
</line>
<line>
739-743.
</line>
<line>
Como R*fer*nciar este A*tigo, co**orme ABNT:
</line>
<line>
COSTA, E. M. *; FERNANDES, T. P; SILV*, J. P; N*RI*LE*, *. *. Earnings Quality and
</line>
<line>
Investment E*fici*ncy: A* Analysi* o* Electricity C*mpa*ies *iste* i* B3. R*v. ***, Teresina, v.*8,
</line>
<line>
n. 04, art. *, p. 4*-67, abr. 2021.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Contr*b**ção dos Aut*res
</line>
<line>
E. M. F. C*st*
</line>
<line>
T. P. Fernandes
</line>
<line>
J. P. Silva
</line>
<line>
R. M. N*riller
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1) concepção e *lane*amen**.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2) an*lis* e interpret*çã* dos dados.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
3) *laboração ** *ascunho ou na re*isão críti*a do cont**do.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
4) participaçã* *a apr*vaç*o *a vers** **nal do manuscrito.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teres*na PI, v. 1*, n. 04, a*t. *, p. 47-67, abr. *021
</line>
<line>
www4.fsanet.c*m.br/rev*sta
</line>
</par>Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Atribuição (BY): Os licenciados têm o direito de copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, conquanto que deem créditos devidos ao autor ou licenciador, na maneira especificada por estes.
Não Comercial (NC): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, desde que sejam para fins não-comerciais
Sem Derivações (ND): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar apenas cópias exatas da obra, não podendo criar derivações da mesma.
ISSN 1806-6356 (Impresso) e 2317-2983 (Eletrônico)