<document>
<page>
<par>
<line>
Centro Unv*rsitário Santo Agostinho
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
www*.fsanet.com.*r/revista
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Tere*i*a, *. *8, n. 9, art. 4, p. 64-79, set. *0*1
</line>
<line>
I*SN Impresso: 180*-6356 ISSN *letrô*ico: 2317-2983
</line>
<line>
http://dx.doi.org/10.12819/2021.1*.9.4
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Braz*l and its National System of Inno*a*ion (Nis): Pe*sp*ctive* *nd Challenges
</line>
<line>
* *rasil e seu S*stema Nacio*al de *n*vação (Sni): *erspectivas * *esaf*os
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Julian* Var*as
</line>
<line>
Dou*o* em Ciên*ias Econômicas pela *ni*ersidade de Bra***ia
</line>
<line>
Profes*or da Universid*de Federa* do Piauí
</line>
<line>
E-ma*l: juliano.vargas@*fp*.edu.br
</line>
<line>
Adriel Na*cimento S*nt*s
</line>
<line>
Gradua**o em Ciê*ci*s Econômica* d* *niversi*ade Federal do Pi*u*
</line>
<line>
Particip*nte do progr*ma de Iniciação Ci*ntí*ica Voluntár*a (IC*)
</line>
<line>
E-m*il: ad*ielsanto*@uf*i.*du.br
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ende*eço: *uliano Vargas
</line>
<line>
*ditor-Chefe: Dr. Tonny Kerley de A*encar
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Avenida J*ã* X*I*I, n* 3820, *eca**o das Palmeiras,
</line>
<line>
R*d*igue*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Condomíni* Bouleva**, t*rre a, apto. 408.CEP 64045-
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
7*5 - Tere*i*a (PI). Brasi*.
</line>
<line>
*r*igo *ecebido *m 03/09/2021. **tima
</line>
<line>
ver*ão
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
</page><page>
<par>
<line>
Brazil and i*s National *ys**m of Inn*vatio* (Nis): Pe*s*ecti*es and Challenges
</line>
<line>
*5
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
AB*TRACT
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Based on t*e evolutionary a*p**ac*, in this pa*er we deal wi*h th* growing imp*rtance of
</line>
<line>
N*tional Innovation Systems (N*S) f*r s*cioeconomic development, fo*using *n th* Brazilian
</line>
<line>
case. For this, in*tially we d*scu*s the conn*ctions between NIS and socioe*onomic
</line>
<line>
de**lopment. Next, we discuss a set o* r**or*s and off**ial *ta*i**ics that i*dicat* the curr*nt
</line>
<line>
reality o* t*e Brazi*ian innovation system. In *h*s *erspective, *e analyze the ch*l**n*e* *nd
</line>
<line>
perspecti*es for Brazil in th* fa*e of t*e econom* and socie*y of the *1st century, which are
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
increasingly co**lex and globali*ed. It is considered that, d*s*ite the a*vances si*c*
</line>
<line>
t *e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1990s, the Brazilian innovat*on syste* l*cks adjustments to e*fectiv*l* and efficiently
</line>
<line>
contrib*te t* the Brazil*an *ocioecono*ic develop*ent.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Key*o*ds:
</line>
<line>
**azi*. I*n**ation S*ste*s. **cio*con*m*c. Dev*lopm*nt. Evoluti*n**y
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Appro*ch.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
RES*MO
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Com b**e *a abordage* evolucionária, neste art*go tratamos
</line>
<line>
da crescente importân*ia dos
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Sistemas Nacionais d* Inovação para o desenvolvimento *ocioe*onômico, com foco no ca*o
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
brasile*ro. P*ra iss*, i*icia*mente discutimos as co**xõe*
</line>
<line>
entre o sis*ema nacional *e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
inovação e o desenvolvimento socioe**nômico. A seguir, di*cutimos um conjunto
</line>
<line>
*e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
rela*órios e estatísti*as oficiais que indicam a real*dade at*al d* sistema de
</line>
<line>
inovação
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
br*sileir*. Nessa pers*ectiva,
</line>
<line>
ana*isam*s os d*safio* e as perspectivas do Br*sil diante
</line>
<line>
da
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
econo*ia * da sociedade *o século XXI, cada vez *ais complex*s e globalizad*s. Considera-
</line>
<line>
se *ue, apesar dos avanç** desde a décad* de 1990, o sist*ma brasileiro de inov*ç*o care*e *e
</line>
<line>
ajustes que contrib*am de form* efetiva e eficien*e pa*a * *esenvolviment* socio*conômico
</line>
<line>
*rasile*ro.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Palavras-chave:
</line>
<line>
Bras*l. S*s*ema* de inovaç*o. Socioeconômic*. De*envo*vimento.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Abo*da*em Ev*lucioná*ia.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
*ev. FSA, Teresina **, v. 18, n. 9, ar*. *, p. 64-79, set. 2021
</line>
<line>
*w*4.fsanet.co*.br/r*vi**a
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. Vargas, A. N. Sant*s
</line>
<line>
*6
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1 INTRODUÇÃO
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
An express*ve socioeco*omic develop*ent is im*robable wi*ho*t in*ovati*n,
</line>
<line>
especially *n the b*ginning of this 21s* cent*ry. *he i*ternationa* techno*ogic*l *anguard is a
</line>
<line>
*i*e q*a *on co*dition to *each and r*main am*ng those w*th real possibilities *f a vigorou*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
socioec*nomic dynamic. To do so, c**ating an eff*ctive an* efficient NIS is practically
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
m us t .
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*n this vein, *e aim i* *hi* study to exami*e the gr***ng imp*rtance o* NIS for
</line>
<line>
socioecon*mic d*v*lopmen*, f*cu*ing *n the *r*zilian case. The basic questions *hat will be
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dis**ssed are the foll*wing: i) what a*e th* main c**n*ctions bet*een NIS
</line>
<line>
an*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
socioeconomic *ev*lopment? ii) what do the offi*ial *eports *nd statisti*s on the
</line>
<line>
cur**nt
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
real*ty of the *razil*an innovation system points ou*? iii) in **is
</line>
<line>
perspect*ve, wha*
</line>
<line>
a** *h*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
m*in ch*l*enges *nd opportun*tie* pr**ented for B*azil in this complex and global*ze* co*text
</line>
<line>
of the 21st century?
</line>
<line>
Meth*dologicall*, a theoretical readin* o* a h*ter*dox nature *s a*opt*d, **re
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
specifical*y *he evolutionary app*oach
</line>
<line>
on Economics (a l* Ne*s*n & Winte*, 198*). For the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
li**ra*u*e review, se*o*dary bibliograph*c so***** from re*earchers dedicated to *he object of
</line>
<line>
study were used. It support* *nd is suppo**e* by conc*ptual, st*ti*tic*l **d anal*t*cal stu**es
</line>
<line>
of offic*al institutions addr*ssing the t**me. *o*e of *hem are the Organi*ation for *cono*ic
</line>
<line>
Cooperat**n and Develo*ment (OECD), At*as of Econo*ic C*mp*e*it* (AEC), World Bank
</line>
<line>
(W*), *n*ted Nations Ed*c**ional, S*ient*fic *nd Cult*ral O**a*ization (UN**CO), Ins**tuto
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Brasileiro de G*ografi* e E*tatístic* (IBGE) and Minist*rio da Ciên*ia, Tecnolog*a
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
In*vaç*o (BRASIL/*CTI/E*cti).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
This arti**e ** struct*red in three secti*ns, tog*the* with this i*trodu*t*on **d the *inal
</line>
<line>
considerations. *n th* second sectio* w* pre*ent s**e of the mai* relat**nshi** between *I*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
an* s*cioeconomic develo*ment, showing in a**i*ion t* -
</line>
<line>
th* def*ni*ions of some *on*ep*s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
that *ill ***meate
</line>
<line>
t h* s t ud y - ho w b*t h
</line>
<line>
i*teract and feedback. In the third, we interpret
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
o*fici*l documents and statistics o* formal institutions,
</line>
<line>
*n order to overview th* innovat*on
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
system
</line>
<line>
in Brazi*. Th* *reviou* s*ction* will pr*vide the*re*i*a*
</line>
<line>
insu*s for the *our*h, *n
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
whi*h the contempora*y challenges a*d opp**tuni**e* for **e count*y *re anal*zed.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teres*na, *. 18, n. *, ar*. 4, p. 64-*9, s*t. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.fsanet.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
*raz** a*d its National S*s*em of Inno**tion (Nis): Perspec*ives and Cha*lenges
</line>
<line>
67
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2 NIS A** SOCIOE*ON*M*C DEV*LOPMEN*: MA*N *ONNECT*ONS
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The first writ*ngs on t** NIS dat* *ack t* the 19th ce*t*ry, stemm*ng from the *tudies
</line>
<line>
of *ri*drich Lis* ([1841] 188*), that *d*r*ssed sys*emic inter*ctio*s between countries and
</line>
<line>
withi* them. The fun*am*nta* ide* was that o* a syst*m, suc* as a continuous process
</line>
<line>
between di*f*rent institu*ions, in which the *uthor **vest*gated the traje*tor* of the **ited
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
States and En*lan*. This
</line>
<line>
th**e was resume* in the late *980s, inspired *y *he rapid
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
tec*nol*g**al chang*s that are still on*oing. For th* expr*ss*on N*S there are se*era* *on-
</line>
<line>
c*nsensual defin*tions, a*ong w*ich fo*r **ands out:
</line>
<line>
i) the network of institutions in th* public an* private *ecto*s whose ac*i*iti*s
</line>
<line>
and inte*action* in*tiat*, *mpo*t, modify and *iffu*e n** techn*l*gies
</line>
<line>
(FREE*AN, *987, p. 1);
</line>
<line>
ii) all parts and aspects of the economic **r*cture and *h* inst*tutional set-up
</line>
<line>
aff*cting learni*g as w*l* as s**r*hing and explor**g (L*NDVALL, 19**, p.
</line>
<line>
* 2 );
</line>
<line>
i*i) * set of in*tit*t*ons *hose *nteract*ons de*ermine the innovativ*
</line>
<line>
performance [...] o* nationa* firms (NELSON, *993, p. 4);
</line>
<line>
iv) a*l import*nt econ**ic, social, polit*cal, *rganisati*nal, institution*l and
</line>
<line>
other f*ctors **at influence the development, diffusion and use of inno**tion*
</line>
<line>
(EDQ*IST, *997, p. 14).
</line>
<line>
From these definitio*s, note* that NIS encompass the flow of infor*ati*n a*d
</line>
<line>
te*hno*ogy betw*en institutions, **ople *** compan*es, essential **r t*e innovativ* process at
</line>
<line>
t*e national leve*. They result fro* a complex s*t of r*lationships a*ong the va*iou* actors of
</line>
<line>
th* system, esp*cially governm*nt resea*ch i*stitutes, companies *nd univ*rs**ie*.
</line>
<line>
The inn*va*ion system co*cep*ion assumes that ea** case is unique and sh*ul* be
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
analyzed in its conte*t and a*cording *o i*s specificiti*s, w*th which its critics
</line>
<line>-</line>
<line>
especially
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*hose o* eco*o*ic or**odoxy - *u*ge *t methodolo**cally diffuse. This cr*ti*ism advances on
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the sy*t*mic and endogenous
</line>
<line>
vi**
</line>
<line>
o* p*blic poli**es, sin*e the governme*t i* seen in
</line>
<line>
t *i s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
approac* as an *ctive agent - coordinating public policies - and not as a m*rk*t fai*ure.
</line>
<line>
It *s *lso cons*de*ed the "concept of g*obal pu**ic goods and the n*t*on of k*owledge
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
as a g*obal publi* good" e*aborate* by Stiglitz (1999,
</line>
<line>
p. *5). It *n*er*tanding the *I* as
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
somet*ing that can efficien*ly and effectively
</line>
<line>
cont*ib*te t* re*lection
</line>
<line>
an* action
</line>
<line>
as
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*nstr*ments that should be o*ien*ed not only to econo*ic *rowth, but *o t*e promotion of the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
socioec*nomic
</line>
<line>
*evelopment of international and n*tional commun*t*es. *quitable
</line>
<line>
us e
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ro*uction of
</line>
<line>
*lo*al knowledge d*rect** r**uire collective initiativ*. The internatio*al a
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teresina PI, v. 18, n. 9, ar*. 4, p. *4-79, set. 2*21
</line>
<line>
www4.fsanet.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. Va*gas, A. N. S*nto*
</line>
<line>
68
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
comm**ity *aces a ch*l*enge, th*t i*, to m*ke our curr*nt syst*m *f v*lun*ary and cooperat*ve
</line>
<line>
governance t*rn to the collective inter*s*s of *ll.
</line>
<line>
Asso*iat*d wit* this con*eption o* k*owledge as a public good is the ro*e o*
</line>
<line>
i*nov*tion for the soc*oeconomic de*el*p*en* of c*unt**es. *or Fagerb*rg, S*holec &
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Verspagen (20*0), innovation is seen as c**ried out
</line>
<line>
b* highly skille* R&D i***nsive hu*s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
l*cated in the world\s *eading *enters of e*cel*enc*. Fr*m this p*rspe*tive, innovation i*
</line>
<line>
an
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
exclusive activi*y of
</line>
<line>
adv*nced c*untries. However, ther*
</line>
<line>
is another way of looking
</line>
<line>
at
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i*novation *hat goes far beyon* this high-tec* ima*e. In * bro*der perspe**ive, innovatio* -
</line>
<line>
such as trying new or imp*oved produ**s, pr*cesses o* ways to do t*in*s - is jus* one asp*ct
</line>
<line>
of most socioecon*mic activities. *hus, in*o**ti*n sh*uld b* *erceived as a rel*van* *ractice
</line>
<line>
for all existing communitie*.
</line>
<line>
From this discussi*n emerges an*ther, which, *n turn, unfold* i* two other*: the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
i**ortan*e *nd
</line>
<line>
imp*ications of NIS for the s*c*o****omic *evelopment agenda. *iven th*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
co*plexity of the
</line>
<line>
inno*atio* p*ocess, attempts to integr*te *t into
</line>
<line>
a s*st** hav*
</line>
<line>
- in
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
developing countrie* - emph*s*zed its implementati*n via f*rmal *nstitution*, o*ie**ed to *he
</line>
<line>
a*aptation and absorption of establish*d pra*tices.
</line>
<line>
Nevert*eless, *ther aspects h**e b*en neglected i* these countrie*, such as an agenda
</line>
<line>
focused on *he le**ning process. It is an essenti*l *art *f the i*novation process and,
</line>
<line>
co*sequentl*, the learning proce** is carved b* practical experiences and the econo*ic
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
structure in which it pe*petuated. Uniquely in em*rging developing coun*ries, l*arning is is
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
l*n*e* ** the *atu*al capab*lities needed to transform and modify knowledge
</line>
<line>
*o m*et and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
adapt local cond*ti*ns and context (OECD, 2010).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Anot**r aspec* ** *h* relat*o*s be*ween NIS and s**ioeconom*c devel*pment
</line>
<line>
i* th* structural ch*nge - in full course - of the *roduc*iv* paradigm, that is, *he trans*t*on
</line>
<line>
fro* essentially in*ustrial economies to the predominan*e of s*rvic* econo*ies *s a majority
</line>
<line>
*ortion o* gr*ss domestic product (*DP). This is particularly c*iti**l when it com*s to *he
</line>
<line>
ac*el*r*t*d in*e*nationaliza*ion of servic**. This o*cur* *n progressi*e competi*ive global
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dyna*ic, wher* techn*logy allows virtually barr*e*-*ree entry *nd
</line>
<line>
exi* from mar*ets
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(i*c*uding labor). There is
</line>
<line>
no econo*y o* **ciety immune to this, *hich imposes
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
socioe*o*omic cha*lenges *nd opp*r**ni*ies, part*cularl* over develop*ng on** (*HILLIP*
</line>
<line>
and LÉO, 2010).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
The rob*tizatio* of procedures c*ntinu*s ** evolve; software *oday c*n *o
</line>
<line>
as never
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
befor* tasks t*at were pr*viously done by pe*ple. If the aim is increasing *ompetitiveness and
</line>
<line>
existi*g as companies, i* requir*s chang*s in *he organizati*n, suc* a* methods *nd ways of
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, Tere*i*a, v. 18, n. 9, *rt. 4, p. *4-7*, set. 2021 www4.fsa*et.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Br*zil an* its Nati*na* System of Innovation (N*s): Perspe*tive* a*d Challe*ges
</line>
<line>
69
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ela*ing to the customers (an* c*ti*ens, in the *ase o* the St*te). Thus, it can
</line>
<line>
be seen as
</line>
<line>
a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t*re*t, but it also *f*ers m*ny oppo*tu*iti*s.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
In this vein, it is i*portant to consid*r the social is*ues involving th* theme of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
innov*t*on (and NIS). Accor*ing to Kline & *ose*berg (1986), s*cial
</line>
<line>
**sues matter:
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
increase *n
</line>
<line>
techniqu* is
</line>
<line>
an h**tori*al labor saver, *hich leads to d*bates nowadays about
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
socio-techn*cal systems and *ocial technology. Therefore, it is necessary t* *ook **
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
innovation proces* as **ange *n the system as a whole, which encompasses the market a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
environment, st*ck *f *rev*ous technical
</line>
<line>
*n*wledge,
</line>
<line>
pr*duc* life cycle, in addition to the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
vari*us social contexts in which it *s inse*t*d.
</line>
<line>
*n the curre*t e*onomic and social s*age, very glo**lized an* c*mplex, some *f the
</line>
<line>
**in connections of NI* w*th socioeconomic develo*men* remain theoretically man*fest*d,
</line>
<line>
as wel* as the i*portance of the former in supporting the latter, as both interact and f*ed back
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
into a cumul*tive ci*cu*ar
</line>
<line>
pro*e**. Th*s fa*ors the adoption of a sustained
</line>
<line>
de*elop*ent
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
strate*y th*t
</line>
<line>
c*n *ffectively contribute to th* imp*o*em*nt of **vi*g conditions *n gen**al, a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
thi*g certai*ly *esire* by all societies and th*t ** Brazil in partic*lar *s still muc* to advance.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
In order to con*or* a b*ief overview of the inn*vation sy*tem in Braz*l
</line>
<line>
and
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
empirically
</line>
<line>
attest its im*orta*ce for *ati*nal socioeco**mic deve*opm*nt, the followi*g
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
section will b*
</line>
<line>
dedicated to *he
</line>
<line>
pres*ntation **d interpr*tation of some stati*tica*
</line>
<line>
da*a
</line>
<line>
*nd
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
of*ic*al documents of in*ernati**al an* nation** institutions.
</line>
<line>
3 *OT*S ON *NN*VATI*N IN *RAZ*L: TIMID AD*ANC*S
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
With regard t* Bra*il, a
</line>
<line>
country wi*h n*merous histori*al obstac*es to its
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
soci*e*onomic develo*ment, it can be affir*ed tha* its innovation *ystem - which began to **
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
implem*nted **ly in
</line>
<line>
the 19*0s - co*tin*es to p*esent an in*erm*dia*e level standard. His
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*c*ion* in t**s are* - to *e di*cussed in t*e ne*t sect**n - are o* the type top-*own wi*hout *h*
</line>
<line>
*ecognition of th*** most *romising **d advantag*ous niches. This dis*ussio* is *e*urrent *n
</line>
<line>
**e Brazili*n academi* literatur*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Albuquerque (1996), for exampl*, based *n
</line>
<line>
the defi**tions *f N*S and the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
systemati*atio* of th* data that hav* be*n already existin* on science and tec**ology (S&T)
</line>
<line>
divided th* standar*s into *hree dist*nct categories: *) those that allo* *dvanced count*ies t*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
m**nta*n
</line>
<line>
*h* *nte*nat***al technologica* vanguard; ii) those that a**ow countries to
</line>
<line>
*im
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dissem*nation of *nnovat*ons, since th*y absorb the advances gen*rated
</line>
<line>
in the p**vious
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teresina *I, v. 18, n. 9, art. 4, p. 64-79, set. 202*
</line>
<line>
www*.*sanet.c*m.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. Vargas, *. N. Santos
</line>
<line>
70
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
category; iii) *hose who have no* com*leted, a*e immature and w*t**ut S&T struct*re a
</line>
<line>
suitable for the p*oductive sector and that contributes little to t*e *evelopment of t*e country.
</line>
<line>
Bra**l, *cc*rdin* *o the data revealed by *he *uthor, fell into this last c*tego*y, in a much
</line>
<line>
lo*er stan*a*d than the mature NIS in that mo*en*.
</line>
<line>
Despite almo*t t*i*ty years o* many initiat**es for **e *mplementati*n of a successful
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
innovat*o* sys*em in B**zil, all this time was not enough *o
</line>
<line>
ac*ieve s*cces* on suc*
</line>
<line>
*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
j*urney. Brazil has consolidated instit*t*ons of the *nnova*i*n system *h*ough meas*res very
</line>
<line>
sim*lar to tho*e adopted *n countries with inno*ati** **stems co*sidered matu*e. Ho*ev*r, it
</line>
<line>
has not yet manage* to cre**e or make the existent intera*tion channels capable of **ovidin*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
legal c**t*i*ty, encouragi*g intera*tions *n*
</line>
<line>
gi*i*g dynami** to
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
<line>
componen*s o* the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
syst*m (TURCHI; MORAIS, 2017).
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
UNESCO (2*15, p. *0-11) al*o *nd*cates that despi*e *he advance* of Brazil, it h** not
</line>
<line>
bee* able to a***n with the lea*i** cou**rie* in research and d*ve*opment (R&D) in*estment
</line>
<line>
(espec*ally the public one). Public **mmitme*t *o R&D *as *emained unchanged since 200*,
</line>
<line>
although the private sector has *n*reased sl*ghtly from *ts own effort. A*l companies ** the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
research co*ducted
</line>
<line>
in the tri*nn*um 20*5-2017 reported a fall in innov*t*on activity since
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2011. What we can expe*t is th*t this trend wi*l **ve effects on s*en*ing if **e *razilian
</line>
<line>
*conomic *lowdown pe*sists.
</line>
<line>
T**s as*e*tion is corro*ora*ed, *or example, by the da** provided by IBGE/P*NTEC
</line>
<line>
2017 (2020), wh*ch shows that *ust ove* a t*ird of Brazi*ian c*mpanies made som* ef*ort to
</line>
<line>
innovate between 2015 *nd 2017 (*igure 1), which is unsatisfactory for more robu*t a*va*ces
</line>
<line>
in the sector.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, Teresina, v. 18, n. 9, art. *, p. 64-79, set. 2*21
</line>
<line>
www4.**anet.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Brazil *nd *ts National Sy*t*m of I*no*ation (Nis): *erspec*ives and Chal*e*ges
</line>
<line>
71
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Fig**e 1 - Pa*ticipatio* in the numb*r *f comp*nie* that have implem*nted produ*t or
</line>
<line>
process *nno*ations, by sectors of activities, accordi*g to *he type of innovation - Brazil
</line>
<line>
(2015-2017) (%)
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Sourc*: IBGE/PINT*C (*020, p. 2).
</line>
<line>
Th*r* is anoth*r disturbing *act contai**d in IBGE/*I*TEC 2*17 (2020). It con*erns
</line>
<line>
the frag*lity of i*novative efforts, with a pro*ortion of revenue *edi*at*d to innovative
</line>
<line>
inve*tments (*xp*ns*s) o* only 1,65%. This is even worse if *i*en *he propo*tion that R&D
</line>
<line>
spending i* tot*l sp*n*ing on innova*io*. These li*itatio**, the docu*e*t concludes,
</line>
<line>
*bserved in the scope o* *ompanies\ in*ovations, are r*lated *o th* limited amount they
</line>
<line>
devot* t* R&D inv*stm*nts: only 10.91% o* tot*l spending on *nnova**ve a*t***ties.
</line>
<line>
*ith *e*ard t* public sector inv*stmen*, the situation is even more serious. Federal
</line>
<line>
g*vern*en*\s objective set *ut in th* propos*l ca*le* the National Strate*y for S*ience,
</line>
<line>
Technology and Innovation 2016-2*19 (BRASIL/MCTI/Encti, 2016) was to *nves* *% of
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
national
</line>
<line>
GDP in R&D by 2019 - whi*h would bring Brazil to an investment level closer t*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the OECD avera*e of 2.4% *n 20*5 (OEC*, *01*). It s**uld be em*hasized t*at until the last
</line>
<line>
available data, in 2017, R&D investment in t*e country was **ly 1.2*% (WB, 2020), well
</line>
<line>
be*ow the target to be achieved.
</line>
<line>
This s*ructu** reflects t*e pos*tions **at Br*zil occupies in sev*ral rankings *elated to
</line>
<line>
the NIS. Two examples *** emblematic. **rst, the Global Innovation *n*ex - a ra*king of
</line>
<line>
c*un*ries based on their capa*ity and success in the field of inn*vation. In * univ**se of 131
</line>
<line>
countr*es, in 2016 Brazil positioned its*lf in the 62*h place (CORNELL UNI*ERSITY,
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, T*re**na PI, v. 18, n. 9, art. *, p. 64-79, set. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.fs*net.co*.br/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. *argas, A. N. Santos
</line>
<line>
72
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
INSEA* & W*PO, 2020). Second, The Glo*al Competitiveness Report 20*9 (G*R) (WEF,
</line>
<line>
2019), in *hich th* country appears in t*e 7**t positio* in * ranking fr*m 141 c*untries.
</line>
<line>
Also noted in this *i*id *volut*on *f Brazil\s in*ovation system is **e in*o*mation
</line>
<line>
gat*ere* by the Atlas *f Economic Complexit* (201*). Considering *hat th* p*oducts made in
</line>
<line>
a socie*y ca* be used as a measure of knowled*e, the *co*omic com*lexity of a c*untry is
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
calcu*at*d ba*ed on the va*ie*y *f exp*rts produced in
</line>
<line>
comparison w*th *he n*mber *f
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ountri*s capable of *roducing *hem. From
</line>
<line>
*h*s derives t** Economic Comp*exity Index
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
(ECI), whi*h concerns * spe**fic overall given econom*.
</line>
<line>
In the co**arison be*w*en *995 and *0*8 - th* first and last d*ta available by the
</line>
<line>
Atlas, figures 2 and * sho*s which products are vi***e fo* expo*t from Brazil an*, m*re
</line>
<line>
*pecifically, the country\s diversification o*p*rtunities based on what it c*rrently exp*rts.
</line>
<line>
F*gur*s 2 and 3 - Opportunities fo* diver*ific*tion of B*azil b*sed on what *t ex**rts
</line>
<line>
B*azil - (19*5 *nd *0*8) (ECI)
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
R*v. FSA, *eres*na, v. 18, n. 9, art. 4, p. 64-79, set. **21
</line>
<line>
www*.f*anet.com.br/re*ista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Bra*il and its Na*ional Syst*m of Innovation (Nis): Perspe*tives a*d Ch*llenges
</line>
<line>
*3
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Sour*e: A*las of Eco*omic Complexit* (2018). Note: The purple c*lor d*notes t*e chemicals and *lastics, while
</line>
<line>
the light b*ue colo* *efer* to t*e electronics. Bo**, in the authors\ view, are the two a*pects *n*lyzed by the Atlas
</line>
<line>
that h**e the most rel*tionship with NIS.
</line>
<line>
Figures 2 and 3 let eviden* the timid a**ances in absol*te **rms of Brazil and *ts
</line>
<line>
setback whe* c*mp*re* *o o*her c*unt*ies. *or exam*le, in * *niverse o* 1*2 n*tions, in 1995
</line>
<line>
B*az*l wa* in the positi*n twenty-nine (with ECI of 0.*44), while in 2*18 it w*s the fiftie*h
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ositio* (with ECI of 0.16). Thi* a*tests how the countr* i* laggin* behind ot*er
</line>
<line>
econom*es
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
an* *oci*ti*s in *h* *echnological rac* and therefore on t*e path to impr*ving ou*
</line>
<line>
socioecon**ic performance.
</line>
<line>
After the a*sump*ions *f the e*olut*onary approach and *h* information **mpared
</line>
<line>
her* re*ealing the sc*nar*o *f in**vatio* in Brazil, it is observed that the*e is still muc* to be
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
d*n*. T*e medium and lon* ter* *la*ning and management of the Brazi*ian
</line>
<line>
innovation
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
s*stem can - and sho**d - be an *ssential co*po*ent of nationa* stra*egy of s*stained a
</line>
<line>
socioe*on*mic developme*t. Wha**ver *acroeco*omic poli*ies t* *e de*igned for the
</line>
<line>
co*ntry, it is nece**ary to take *nto account the importance of *echno*og* for i*s growth an*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
dev*lopment, giv*n the increa*ing complexity an* interde*enden*e a**ng
</line>
<line>
internationa*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ec**omie*. It is in the lig** of this reali*y that in the next sect*on are *nalyzed *hallenges a*d
</line>
<line>
opportu*ities of B*azil and its *nnov*ti*n sys*em.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. F*A, Te**sin* P*, v. 1*, n. 9, art. 4, p. 6*-79, s*t. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.fs*net.com.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. Vargas, A. N. Santos
</line>
<line>
74
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
4 I*NOVA*ION SYSTEM OF BRAZIL: CHALLENG*S AN* **ORTUNITIES
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
A* expressed in the previous section, the actions of the innova*ion system a*e of t*e
</line>
<line>
typ* t*p-d*wn without the *ecognitio* of the** most p*omisi*g and *dvantageous niches.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Gover*ment *omes
</line>
<line>
in a** out; the
</line>
<line>
initiatives n*rmal*y fails to m*te*ialize in concrete
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ad*ances. This co*sum*ated *n a structure of th* t*pe stop-and-go. Perhaps, *ore p*omising
</line>
<line>
was * smaller amou** of investments, provided w**h th* guarantee* of f*nancing *f the
</line>
<line>
propo*ed projects an* p*licies.
</line>
<line>
*he*e are many reas*ns f*r t*e *os* of space in *razil in i*su*s co*cerni*g t*e *IS, as
</line>
<line>
seen in this research. They range *ro* *he l*t* beginning of the *ountry in *mpleme*ting its
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
innovation system, through the prec*rious way in which t*is process took
</line>
<line>
pl*ce, to the
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
pr*b*ems *r*sing from the lo* *apa*it* of k*owledge abso*pti*n, new te**nologi**, e*c..
</line>
<line>
It must be acknowledged that over time there have be** success ca*es (EM*RAPA,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
EM*RAER and PETRO*RAS, for ex*mp*e), bu* *lso that *t is
</line>
<line>
not e**ugh to Brazil\s
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
numerous pote*tialities, vide, fo* example, the Ipea stu*y th*t *resents *he main results of the
</line>
<line>
mapping **o*ect of *he Br**ilian sci*ntif*c and technolog***l r*search *nf*astru*ture (DE
</line>
<line>
NEGRI a*d SQU**F, 2016). Th* conclusion is *hat: **ere *r* a fe* Brazilian institutions
</line>
<line>
capable *f ha*ne*si*g econo**e* *f *cale and scope th*t could increase *f***i*n*y of sci*ntific
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*esearch in
</line>
<line>
the coun*ry. The most of
</line>
<line>
*ts *esearch infrastructure is made *p of small
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
laborator*es (spaces)
</line>
<line>
that d*
</line>
<line>
n*t s*em to be
</line>
<line>
able t* provide, by
</line>
<line>
themse*ves, the same
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*ondit*ons of res**rch as in other *o*ntri*s.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Br*zil should **v*ew its S&T res*urce alloc*tio* p*li*y that has **ng
</line>
<line>
prio*itized
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
g*ea*er fragmenta*ion and m*y ha*e he*ped in th* creation of such a dissol*ed system, w*ich
</line>
<line>
caused li*tl* compet*tiveness. In th*s sens*, it is t*e c*se *f the s*lf-expla**tory exp*ession of
</line>
<line>
li*ited by design from Crow & *oz*man (1998), *hose d*fends *he t*esis that *ays *he NIS
</line>
<line>
is a r*sul* of po*i*y co*t**ts *n whi*h **ey a*e embedde* *ve* time.
</line>
<line>
Another aspect *h*t deserv** speci*l atte**ion on the national i*novation s*stem is
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
wha* concerns socia*
</line>
<line>
tec**ology (application of technology fo* so**al purposes). It s*ould
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
h*ve activ* participat*on of the State - in additio* *o *onventio*al technolog*es - when it
</line>
<line>
come* to the *ole of innovation fo* socioe*o*omi* development. This niche *s li*tle e*plored
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
a*d has *rea* pote*tial for improvi*g
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
<line>
life cond*tion*
</line>
<line>
of the Brazil*a* cit*zenship,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
espe*ia*ly its most vuln*rable **r**on.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
It is on the guide*ines of the so-call*d Inn*vati*n Law (BRASIL, 2004) that i* in it*
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
article 27 says: "VI - prom*te the developme*t *nd dissemi*ati*n of so*ial *echnolo*ies to
</line>
<line>
Rev. *SA, Teresina, v. 18, n. 9, *rt. 4, p. 64-79, set. 2021 www4.f*anet.*om.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Bra*il and its National S*stem of Inno*a*ion (Nis): *ersp*ctives a*d Chal*enges
</line>
<line>
75
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
and t* streng*hen the t*chnological exte*sion *or pro*uctive and socia* inclusion". In o**er to
</line>
<line>
comply with t*is orientation, there m*st be *n ar*iculation of the various agents involved in
</line>
<line>
the Brazilian S&T proc*ss, whic* include*: i*cubators, scientific in*ti*utions, *echnol*gy and
</line>
<line>
*n*ovatio* (*CTs), parks and *echnolog*c*l center* for innovatio*, etc.
</line>
<line>
An objective of the **no*at*on Law is to sti**late the socia* techno*ogi*s focus*d on
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
the problems
</line>
<line>
of
</line>
<line>
the ge*era* popu*a*ion. T* t*is *nd, financial re*ources are made availabl*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*nn*ally to pu*lic ed*cat*onal institut*ons, bu* there i* a la*k of c*arity in def*ni*g what the*
</line>
<line>
fi* as socia* technol*gies h*nde*s (or prevent*) the *udge* e*ecution of these resources. It c*n
</line>
<line>
be seen that the agen*s of *he national in*ovation system have hardl* wa*ched for this
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
opportu*ity, typical of the
</line>
<line>
2*st century scenar*o, *hich in the NI* of
</line>
<line>
*he countries *it*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
technologic*l *va*t-ga*d* *av* been re*eate*ly stimulated.
</line>
<line>
Based on the abo*e, i* is clear t*at *razil presents eno***u* *hall*n*es to co*so*idate
</line>
<line>
*ts in*ovation syst**. Th* la**es* of these is di*ectl* re*ated t* a structural transf*rmation
</line>
<line>
a*med at catchin* up with which only *onventi*nal *con*mic policies will be insufficient to
</line>
<line>
d* so. If this process occurs, it will *eces*a*ily be in a mo*e uncer*ain en*iron*ent - with th*
</line>
<line>
*ncreasingly complex *nd globalized *conomy a*d society - where inf*rmation, competence
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
to add
</line>
<line>
va*ue and ec*n*m*c integrat*on w*ll
</line>
<line>
be *he flagship* of econom*c *rowth and social
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
d*velopment. To *his en*, Brazil needs to *ccele*at* t*e s*ep i* *h* *uantitative an* qualitative
</line>
<line>
pr*motion *f knowle*g*, *n order to carry out its pr*jects.
</line>
<line>
However, given the *urren* Br*zilian and international conjuncture, it is hard to predi*t
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*hat this w*ll b* the *ath fo*l*we*. It is ce*tain
</line>
<line>
that, whatever it
</line>
<line>
is, *t mu*t be c**ar that the
</line>
</par><par>
</par>
<par>
<line>
presents a h*ge contrast between its ec**o*y
</line>
<line>
*n* its society: *t is a***g the *en large*t
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
econo*ies
</line>
<line>
on *he pl*net a* t*e sa*e ti*e as in 2018 it was
</line>
<line>
in 79th place in th* *anking of
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
human developm**t of the United Nations (UNDP, 2019). Its most due to its socioec*n*mic
</line>
<line>
*ormation and political/insti*utional con*ucti*n thro*gh **me.
</line>
<line>
This *anorama *nd w*at i* expresses *ef*ects the count**\s contemporary *olitical-
</line>
<line>
institutional archit*cture, rev*aling that the challen*es to *m***ment a solid nation*l
</line>
<line>
Rev. FSA, *eresina *I, v. 18, n. 9, ar*. 4, p. *4-79, set. 2*21 ww*4.fsanet.com.br/r*vista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. Vargas, A. N. Santos
</line>
<line>
*6
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
inno*ation s*st*m f*r soci*econ*mic de*elopment are
</line>
<line>
hug*, while
</line>
<line>
t he
</line>
<line>
p*o*pects for this to
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ha**en - at least in the short and medium ter* - *re n*t promisin*. Th* *ntense budge* cuts
</line>
<line>
an* *estraints in the R&D and C&T a*e** of the las* six years *re clear de*o*strations of this
</line>
<line>
reality.
</line>
<line>
As it is prop*r to innovation and techn*logy, *his unco***rtab*e situation does not
</line>
<line>
have to b* peren*ial. If it exists, there is nothing tha* determines it must pe*sist. The **vances
</line>
<line>
- although tim*d - in this ar*a c*rroborate this assumption. Perhaps wh*t **st can co*tribut*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
t* * bet*er use of Br*zil\s *otential in
</line>
<line>
this field conce*ns the be*te* *rt*culat*on between
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
policies directl* and indire**ly *elated t* it, with the rec*gniti*n o* its most a*s*icious an*
</line>
<line>
a*v*ntageous n*ches. These should be st**ula*ed and implemented deli*er*tely by all **e*ts
</line>
<line>
(i**l*ding *y th* State, *i*h elaboration, impleme*tation, con*rol *n* evaluati*n of p*blic
</line>
<line>
polici*s impleme*ted), establi*hi*g itself especially orient*d to it.
</line>
<line>
Th**efore, it is nec*s*ary to reflect and act a*ound the **tentialities a*d limitations of
</line>
<line>
the Brazilian inn*vation sy*tem, as **ll as for *ts impr*veme*t. ** this sense, it is a*so ur*ent
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*o re*lect and act *n *h* social role of inno*ation. ** i*
</line>
<line>
certain that such a system lacks
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
adjustments so tha* it can cont*ibu*e more effectiv*l* to t** na*i*nal so*ioeconomic
</line>
<line>
development, e*pecially in the face of the econ*my and *ociety of *h* *1*t c*n*u*y, which are
</line>
<line>
increasingl* *omp*ex and *lobaliz*d.
</line>
<line>
REFERENC*S
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ALBUQ*ERQUE, *duardo da Mott*. Sistema nacional de inov*ção no Br*sil:
</line>
<line>
um* análise
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
introdut*ria a partir d* dados *i*ponív*is s***e a ciência e a t*cnologia. Re*ista de
</line>
<line>
Eco*omia Política, vol. 16, *o. 3 (63), pp. 5*-72, julho-*etembro 1996.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
ATLA*
</line>
<line>
OF ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY (*EC). C*nter for Inte*nati*nal Devel*pm*nt *t
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
H*rvard University. Boston: Ha*vard Bu*iness Scho*l, AEC, 201*. Available a*:
</line>
<line>
<http://atlas.c*d.harvard.edu/>. Accessed *n: 12th August 20*1.
</line>
<line>
BRA*IL. Lei n. 10.9*3, de 2 de dezem*ro de 2*04. Di*põe sobre i**entiv*s à inovaçã* e à
</line>
<line>
pesqu*sa **entífi*a e tecno*ógica no a*biente produti** e dá outras providên**as. Brasília:
</line>
<line>
BRASIL, 2004.
</line>
<line>
BRASIL. L*i n. 11.*92, de 29 *e dezemb*o de 200*. In**itui a *ede Federal d* E*uc*çã*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*rofissional, Científ*ca * Tecnoló*ica, cria *s Institu*os Federa*s de Educação, Ciência
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Tecnologia, e dá out*as provi**ncias. Brasília: BR*SI*, 2008.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FS*, Teresin*, v. 18, n. 9, a*t. 4, p. 6*-79, set. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.*san**.com.b*/rev*st*
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
Braz** and its National Syst** of Innovation (Nis): Pers*ectives a*d Cha**enge*
</line>
<line>
77
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
BRAS**. Min*stério da Ciência, Tecnolo**a e Inovação (MCTI). *str*tég*a Na*ional de
</line>
<line>
Ciência, Tecnologia e Inova*ão 2016-201*.*rasília: BRA*IL/MCT*/*nc*i, 2***.
</line>
<line>
CORNELL UN*VER*ITY, INSEAD & WIPO. The *l*bal Innovation Inde* *020: *ho Wi**
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
finan*e Innov*t*on? DUTTA, S.; LANVIN, B.; WUNSCH-VI**ENT,
</line>
<line>
*. (Eds.). 13rd ed.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Ithaca, Fontainebleau a** Ge*ev*, 2020.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
C*OW, Mi*h*el; **ZEMAN, Bar*y. L*mit*d by de*ig*: R&D Labora*o*ies in *he US
</line>
<line>
*ational Innov**ion Syste*. New York: Co*umbia Univ*rsity Press, 1*98.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
DE NE*RI, Fernanda; SQ*EF*, Flá*ia H. S. (Orgs.). Sistemas set*riais de ino**ção
</line>
<line>
e
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
infraest***ura de pesquisa no B*asil. Bra*ília: Ipea/Fine*/*NPq, 2016.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
E*Q*I*T, *harles.
</line>
<line>
*y*tems of *n*ovati*n: Per*pectives and Chal*eng**. In: FAG*RBERG,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Jan; MOW*RY, David; NELSON, Richard, R. (Orgs.).*he Oxford handbook of in*ov*tion.
</line>
<line>
New York: Oxford *niversi** Pres*, *p. 181-208, 2005.
</line>
<line>
*AGERBERG, *an; M*SHOLEC; *artin, Martin, *010*ERSP**E*, Bart. Inn*vat*on an*
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Economic Deve*opment. In: Handbook of the Eco*omi* of In*ovatio*.
</line>
<line>
Vol. 2. HALL,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Bronw*n H; ROSENB*RG, Nat*an (Orgs.). Ams*erdam: Nort*-*ol*a*d, pp. 8*3-872, 2010.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*R*EMA*, Chri*topher. T*c*nolog* pol*cy and
</line>
<line>
economic perfor*ance: Les*ons from
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Japan, Lond*n, Pinter P*b*ishers, 1987.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
INST**UTO *RAS*LEIRO DE GE*GRA*IA E ES*ATÍSTICA (IBGE). Pe*quisa de
</line>
<line>
inovação2017 (PINTEC). R*o de Janeiro: IBGE/P*NTEC 2020.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLIC*DA (Ip*a). Polít*cas de apoio
</line>
<line>
à
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*no*ação tecnológica n* Brasi*: avanços recentes, limi**ções * propostas de aç*es.
</line>
<line>
TURCHI, Leni*a *.; MORAIS, *osé M. (Orgs). Brasíli*: Ipe*, 2017.
</line>
<line>
KLINE, J. Steph*n; ROSEN*ERG, Nathan. An Overview of Innovati*n. In: Landau an*
</line>
<line>
**senberg (O*gs.). T*e positive s*m strategy: Harnessi*g **chnolo*y for e**nomic gr*wth.
</line>
<line>
1986.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
L*IBET**DER, *ettina. A c*it**al review on the conce*t of
</line>
<line>
S*cial Technology. Soci*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Techno*ogies, 1(*), pp. 7-*4, 2011.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
LIST, Friedric*. *he *ational System of Political Economy, translated from the origin*l
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
German editi*n published
</line>
<line>
i n 1841
</line>
<line>
by S*mpson Lloy*. London: Longman*, Gre*n, a*d
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Company, 18*5.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
LUNDVALL, Bengt-Åke (Ed.). National systems of inn*vation. Towards a theory of
</line>
<line>
innovat**n and interact**e le**ni*g. Londo*, Pinter, 1992.
</line>
<line>
NELS*N, R*char*, *.; WI*TER, Sidney *. An Evolu**onar* The*r* o* Eco*om*c Chan*e.
</line>
<line>
B*s*on: Har*ard University Press, 1982.
</line>
<line>
NELSON, *ichard. A. (Ed.).N*tional *nnovation S*stems: A Co*parative Analysis. Oxford
</line>
<line>
Un*ve*sity Press, 199*.
</line>
<line>
Rev. *SA, T*r*si** PI, v. 18, n. 9, *rt. *, p. 64-79, set. *021 www*.fsanet.c*m.br/revista
</line>
</par><page>
<par>
<line>
J. *argas, A. N. *antos
</line>
<line>
78
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*E*LEMANS, Mariu* M. L. National inn*vatio* *ystems. In: I*novati*n and institutions: a
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
multi*i*c*plinar* review
</line>
<line>
of *he study of innovat**n s*stems. *AS*E*, Steven; WAARDEN,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
F*an* van (Or**.). Chel*en*am, UK; No*thampton, US*: Edw**d Elgar, pp. 51-67, 200*.
</line>
<line>
ORGANISATIO* FOR E*ONO**C CO-OPERETI*N AND DEV*L*PM*NT (OECD). T*e
</line>
<line>
r*l*vance o* Innovat*on Syst*ms t* Develo*ing Countries. In: Innovation and t*e
</line>
<line>
de*elopment a*enda. *RA*M*R-MBULA, *r*ka; *AMAE, *atu (Ed*.). Ottawa: OECD,
</line>
<line>
pp. 39-64, 2010.
</line>
<line>
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERA*I*N AND D*VELOPME*T (OECD).
</line>
<line>
OECDS*ience, Te*hnology and Innovation Outlo** 2016.Pa*is: OECD *ublishing, ***6.
</line>
<line>
*HILIPP*, Jean; LÉO, Pie*re-Yve*. Innovation an* internat*onalization: a dynami* coupling
</line>
<line>
*o* business-to-business ser*ices. In: GAL*OUJ, F*ïz, Faïz, DJELLAL, Faridah (E*s.). The
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
*and*oo* of innovation and services: a multi-discip*inary
</line>
<line>
pe**pe*tive. Northampto*,
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
North*mpton, Nort*ampto*. C*eltenham, UK: Edward *lgar, *p. 501-526, *010.
</line>
<line>
S*ETE, *uc; VERSPAGEN, B**t; WE*L, B*s Te*. Syste*s of I*no*ati*n. In: H*ndbook of
</line>
<line>
the Economi* *f Innovation. Vol. 2.HAL*, Bronw*n H; RO*ENBERG, Nat**n (Orgs.).
</line>
<line>
Am*ter*a*: *orth-*olland, pp. *1*1-**80, 201*.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
STIG**TZ, J*sep* E. Knowledge as a g*obal publ*c good. I*:
</line>
<line>
G*obal pu*lic *oods:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
int*r*ational coo**ration in *h* 21*t ce*tury. KAUL, Inge, GRUNBERG, Isab*l*e; S*ER*,
</line>
<line>
Mark. A (*ds.). Oxfor* Uni*ersity Press, New *ork, pp. 30*-325, 1999.
</line>
<line>
*ORLD BANK (WB). R*sear*h a*d development ex*enditure (% of GDP): Br**il
</line>
<line>
(2*00-2017).Washington, D.C.: WB, 202*. Av**labl*: <https://data.worldbank.org/*ndi**tor/
</line>
<line>
GB.XPD.RSDV. GD.Z*?locations=BR>. Acc*ssed in: 11th Au*ust 2021.
</line>
<line>
UN*TED NA*IONS D**ELOPMENT *ROGRAMME (UNDP). H*man *evelopme*t Re**rt
</line>
<line>
2**6. Beyond income, be*ond ave*age*, beyond t*day: In*q*alitie* ** *uman developm*nt in
</line>
<line>
the *1st c*n*ury. New **rk: UND*, 2019.
</line>
<line>
UNI*ED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CU*TURAL O*GAN*ZA**O*
</line>
<line>
(UNESCO). UNESCO Scie*c* Report: towards 2030 - Executive Summary. Paris: UNESCO,
</line>
<line>
2010.
</line>
<line>
WORLD ECONOM*C FOR*M (*E*). Insigh* *e*ort -The G*ob*l C*m*e*itiveness *eport
</line>
<line>
2019. World Economic Forum, Switzerland, 202*.
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, *e*esina, v. 18, n. 9, art. 4, p. 64-79, s*t. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.fs*net.**m.*r/revista
</line>
</par><page>
</document><par>
<line>
B*azi* and its Natio**l Sys*e* of Innovation (Ni*): *e*s*ecti*es and Challenges
</line>
<line>
*9
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Como *eferenciar e*te A*tigo, con*orme AB*T:
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
VARGAS, J; S*NTOS, A. N. *razil an* its National System of Innova*ion (N*s): Perspectiv*s **d
</line>
<line>
Chal*enges. Rev. FSA, Ter*sina, v.18, n. 9, ar*. 4, p. 64-79, set. 2021.
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
Contribu*ção *os Autores
</line>
<line>
J. Varg*s
</line>
<line>
A. N. *an*os
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
1) conc*pção e planejam*nto.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
2) an*li*e e i*terpreta*ão *os *ados.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
3) elaboração do *asc*nho o* na revi*ã* crítica do conteúdo.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
<line>
4) pa*ticipaç*o n* apro*a*ão da versão fin*l do manus*rito.
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
<line>
X
</line>
</par><par>
</page><line>
Rev. FSA, *eres*na PI, v. 18, n. 9, art. 4, p. 64-7*, set. 2021
</line>
<line>
www4.f*anet.com.br/r*vista
</line>
</par>Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Atribuição (BY): Os licenciados têm o direito de copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, conquanto que deem créditos devidos ao autor ou licenciador, na maneira especificada por estes.
Não Comercial (NC): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, desde que sejam para fins não-comerciais
Sem Derivações (ND): Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar apenas cópias exatas da obra, não podendo criar derivações da mesma.
ISSN 1806-6356 (Impresso) e 2317-2983 (Eletrônico)